Richard Sydney-Smith wrote:
Hi Doug.
Many users are haphazard in their approach until the machine fails and
then they expect to be pulled from the poo.
Done it too many times. I now will get the application to enforce an
additional integrity check. It must be backed up or else! Seems futile
On Thursday 06 October 2005 08:34, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote:
> > > If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library
> &g
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:41, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> On 10/4/05, Welty, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aaron Glenn wrote:
> > >Completely incorrect. You can do whatever you like with PostgreSQL;
> > >you just can't sue anyone when things go south.
> >
> > _and_ you need to preserve the
On Monday 19 September 2005 07:08 am, Sean Davis wrote:
> On 9/19/05 12:02 AM, "suresh ramasamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > thanks for the info Devrim,
> >
> > by the way i'm newbie, i have followed the steps in the documentation for
> > compiling and installation. I'm using FC4. ./cofigure c
On Friday 16 September 2005 07:28 am, John DeSoi wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2005, at 9:54 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> > If you need data to propagate from the clients back to the server
> > then things
> > get more complicated. Even then you could side step a lot of
> > headaches if you
> > can structure the
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 10:24 -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
> >
> > It sounds like you need to link gnova.so against the other shared
> > objects so the runtime linker can find them. For examples, see the
> > Makefiles used by contributed modules like dblink, xml2, and a few
> > others that link a
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 13:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Dugan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have been having some trouble with a particular table view. An UPDATE
> > command is not only changing the applicable record it is also creating a
> > new record as well
I have been having some trouble with a particular table view. An UPDATE
command is not only changing the applicable record it is also creating a
new record as well.
wholesale=# select * from accounts_supplier;
id | name | contact | addr| addr2 | town |
postcode | s
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 19:48 +0200, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 24.05.2005, 13:49 -0300 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > It will be a very pleasant idea. Although I am
> > an application developer I don't know if I have
> > enough knowledge to do that. Do you know how could
> > I help t
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 16:19 +, Tope Akinniyi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
--- cut ---
>
> I sought Windows replication tool for and could not get. I checked
> PgFoundry and the one there put a banner and said NOT FOR WINDOWS.
> Then I said is this PostgreSQL for Windows a joke? That prompted
> my p
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 20:40 -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Neil Dugan wrote:
>
> > I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.7
> > I have a table with serveral fields two of these are a serialno
> > (bigserial) and name(varchar). I have created two indexs on these
&
I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.7
I have a table with serveral fields two of these are a serialno
(bigserial) and name(varchar). I have created two indexs on these
fields.
1) on name
2) on name,serialno
if I use the command
'select * from table order by name limit 1'
everything is OK
if I use th
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 01:24 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> Neil Dugan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to find out how to get the next record according to a
> > particular index.
> > I have a table with a name field and a serial field. The n
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 21:47 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 14:03:02 +1100,
> Neil Dugan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to find out how to get the next record according to a
> > particular index.
> > I have a table
Hi,
I am trying to find out how to get the next record according to a
particular index.
I have a table with a name field and a serial field. The name field
isn't unique so I made an index on name(varchar) & serialno(bigserial).
I also have an index just on 'name'. I am having trouble working out
15 matches
Mail list logo
