On 10/10/05, Greg Sabino Mullane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A good question. I think one answer is the MySQL name. Many open-source
> advocates seem enamored of MySQL, but you can never pin them down about
> exactly what it is they love so much about it. Maybe we can rebrand
> PG as "MiSQL" or
On 10/8/05, Mitch Pirtle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This basically means that InnoDB table support must come out of the
> commercial MySQL.
For that matter, I'm not sure they can release MySQL under a
commercial license while incorporating 3rd party GPL works, without
th
On 10/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand. If both MySQL and Innodb are GPL licensed,
> commercial or not should make no difference, and they can add all the
> GPL changes they want o the last Innodb GPL release.
They can only do the GPL stuff in the GPL-lice
