On 10/4/2015 3:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
(Seems like you forgot to push the Reply-all button)
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Madovsky wrote:
On 10/3/2015 3:30 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
and no reason is given to justify *why* this would be needed in your case
reason for a choice can
On 10/3/2015 6:55 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Madovsky wrote:
On 10/3/2015 4:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
replication.
is it pos
On 10/3/2015 4:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
replication.
is it possible to set on the fly the synchronous commit on the master (or
standby?)
which only sync commi
Hi
On 10/3/2015 5:46 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
Madovsky escreveu
> Hi,
>
> I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4
streaming
> replication.
> is it possible to set on the fly the synchronous commit on the master
> (or standby?)
>
Hi,
I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
replication.
is it possible to set on the fly the synchronous commit on the master
(or standby?)
which only sync commit the hot standby node used by the client who has a
read only sql session on?
example:
node1 node2
