duh!listen_addresses = '*'I must add that having to modify both files for
remote access is a bit misleading, and I didn't set at least 4 postgresql
servers before...From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [GENERAL] Ubuntu,
Postgresql-8.2 and remote access thru pg_hba.confDate: Mon, 18 Jun 20
Hi,I just want to say that ubuntu team done an excelent job integration the
penultimate version of postgresql in spite of the fact that I was running 7.4.7
it manages to install 8.2 in paralel without affecting my production version.
There is one single thing that bothers me big time - I cannot
Thanks for replying! I will try to upgrade to the latest on my prod box. Any
easy way to do that ? Can I have two releases in the same time 7.4.7 and 8.2.3
? This is a phased approach so it may take a little while to do it and I want
to have 7.4.7 till I'd be able to switch to the 8.2.3( on a di
ster processes
taking all the CPU> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:08:26PM -0500, MC Moisei
wrote:> > Yes all the connection are coming from within the box so no network>
> latency.Well, isn't the swap can be because too many process> > postmaster
are requiring more mem
l@postgresql.org> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postmaster
processes taking all the CPU> > First, your mail is coming through really
garbled. Maybe you need to> add some linebreaks or something? Anyway> > On
Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:58:40PM -0500, MC Moisei wrote:> > > > I
t a reqular vacuum?> > - Ericson Smith>
Developer> http://www.funadvice.com> > On 6/8/07, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:20:28PM -0500, MC Moisei
wrote:> > >> > > pack of postmaster(4-22) processes ran by
n 2007
16:35:40 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postmaster processes taking all the CPU> > On Fri, Jun
08, 2007 at 03:20:28PM -0500, MC Moisei wrote:> > > > pack of postmaster(4-22)
processes ran by postgres user a
Anyone ?From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [GENERAL] Postmaster
processes taking all the CPUDate: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:23:00 -0500
Hi,I have this server that I use as db server. It's decent box Ubuntu, 2GB, AMD
Barton 2.8Gb L2 2Mb. DB version is 7.4.7 - that version was the only o
Hi,I have this server that I use as db database. It's decent box Ubuntu, 2GB,
AMD Barton 2.8Gb L2 2Mb. DB version is 7.4.7 - that version was the only one
available at that time. I have it for about 2 years in similar configuration.
Lately I've notices that a pack of postmaster(4-22) process
work. The contraints are easy to
migrate once I have the whole structure in place.
Thanks a lot to all for replying to my post that quickly. Keep them coming
if you have more ideas
Regards,
Constantin
http://www.goodstockimages.com
From: Reece Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MC Moisei &
Hi,
I'm looking to migrate psql db1 to a psql db2 that has a different structure
even though 70% would be the same. I'd need a tool that allows me to map
field to field and then migrate the data from one db to another. Needless to
say that preserving data integrity is very important.
Any goo
11 matches
Mail list logo
