[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Hermit Hacker) writes:
| Alot of good points here, and some not so good...last I checked, vacuum was
| still required for Oracle, no?
Does Oracle even have a vacuum? There's the COELESCE command, but it's hardly
*necessary*.
| As for 'front end and report designers'...th
n't see PostgreSQL reversing that trend unless 6.5 is a major leap
forward.
---Ken McGlothlen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
| Consider what we are doing. Commercial database vendors have teams of
| full-time programmers, adding features to their databases, while we have a
| volunteer group of part-time developers.
Oh! I'd never *dream* of maligning the coders working on Pos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Gould) writes:
| > http://www.nettek-llc.com/postgresql/
|
| These are not bad, although the difference in size between the "Postgre" and
| the "SQL" make it a little hard to read as one word. The different background
| for the two parts of the word adds to this. Still,
