Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:59:07AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> >
> >
> > (On that note I would dearly love to get rid of the stupid "[GENERAL]"
> > "[HACKERS]" etc tags? ...
[snip]
> >
> I absolutely agree
I hate the damn things with a passion.
>
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:34:28PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
> > much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
> >
> Personally I'm against
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
> much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
The procmail rules I set up for each mailing list to which I subscribe
sets Reply-To to the mail
Jamie Deppeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This post is a bit off topic im looking a good sql book can someone give
> me a recommendation?
I was pleased with...
The Practical SQL Handbook
Third Edition
Judith S. Bowman, Sandra L. Emerson, & Marcy Darnovsky
Addison-Wesley Developers
"Thomas F.O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the record, you shouldn't have needed to do a dump restore between
> 7.4.1 and 7.4.6 should you?
IIRC, it was 7.4.1 -> 7.4.2 that required either that or some
manual fixing-up.
Jim
---(end of broadcast)
"\"Marc G. Fournier From\"@svr1.postgresql.org"@linxnet.com: <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Seymour) writes:
>
> >Here's another factoid for you. When a new big-8 newsgroup is
> >approved, an "official"
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Personally I think Marc should have waited awhile longer to see whether
> the news.groups process would produce a positive vote, but that's just
> my own $0.02.
That's the way *I* would've preferred to see it handled. Then again:
*I* was lookin
"Gary L. Burnore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> It's ok. Mysql's better anyway.
Was that absolutely necessary?
Jim
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Patrick B Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Marc appears to be the only one NOT making this situation worse.
Appearances can be deceiving--particularly when you're unfamiliar with
the territory.
> Let's
> review. Si
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[I had written]
> >
> > Did you warn the proponent of comp.databases.postgresql.* that you were
> > going to do this? Did you read any of the arguments for and against a
> > completely separate hierarchy that were posted to the RFD thread in
> > new
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Due to recent action by Google concerning the comp.databases.postgresql.*
> hierarchy, we are going to make some changes that should satisfy just
> about everyone ... over the next 24hrs or so, traffic *to*
> comp.databases.postgresql.* from
"Joost Kraaijeveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have three questions about 1 table
>
> CREATE TABLE public.logs
> (
> rule_name varchar(32) NOT NULL,
> bytes int8 NOT NULL,
> pkts int8 NOT NULL,
> hostname varchar(100),
> that_time int4 NOT NULL
> ) WITH OIDS;
>
>
John DeSoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The first public beta for pgEdit is now available ...
[snip]
>
> * Cross platform and easy to install
>
> pgEdit is a native application for both Macintosh and Windows.
That's what you call "cross-platform," eh?
>
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Seymour) writes:
> > I recently upgraded from 7.4.2 to 7.4.6 and have run into a new
> > problem. As frequently as not, maybe even most times, when I "q" out
> > of paging the output of a quer
Hi,
Environment:
SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-29 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-Engine
Postgresql-7.4.6
Build config: --with-java --enable-thread-safety
gcc version 3.3.1
less-381
readline-4.3
$ echo $PAGER
/usr/local/bin/less
$ echo $LESS
-e
I recently
Kay-Uwe Genz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi @ all,
>
> I want to reference the User-ID PG use as an FOREIGN KEY in a tabel of
> my DB. But I saw that pg_user is a view. Where are the information I
> need?
Maybe you could \d the view and find out? *But* you have to have
the proper permissi
Janning Vygen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Thanks to Tom and Peter for your answers. I will design my table without a
> primary key and use my unique index instead of a primary key. As this unique
> key is the same as a primary key i dont see the reason why postgresql
> should't ext
Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Someone please please help me :-(
[snip]
Relax, Steve. The people helping-out on PostgreSQL mailing lists are
in 24 timezones, have real jobs (for which they actually get paid), are
all volunteers (for which they don't get paid), may be going to school,
t
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, BRINER Cedric wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > Imagine that I have the following table where ts_sent is a timestamp(0)
> >
> > select * from notification;
> > to_used| ts_sent | from
> > -
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Simply put:
> 1) If the untrusted value is a string, using a proper escape sequence should
>make it safe.
> 2) If the untrusted value is not a string, then it should be tested for
>proper value (i.e. if it should be a number, it should be
=?iso-8859-1?q?Nilabhra=20Banerjee?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks a lot.. This much is enough for meIf I get
> some time afterwards I go thru it again But I am
> still curious to know about the CFlags variable..what
> are the other values it can take.
The pgsql tarball include
Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Seymour) writes:
>
> > Oh, if you're accepting punctuation nits ;), in most cases, the comma
> > should come after "but," not before it. So your sentence should read
> > "P
t before it. So your sentence should read
"PostgreSQL will run on almost any hardware but, if you are..."
If you wanted to mention other issues to consider, you might include:
>
> -------
>
> Jim Seymour
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:32:15AM -0400, Jim Seymour wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Should I add an FAQ discussing hardware selection and the importance of
> > > reliab
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> pgman wrote:
> > Jim Seymour wrote:
[snip]
> > >
> > > My position is that your data is only as reliable as your hardware,
> > > period.
[snip]
> >
> > There is a basic misconception that
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> We do need to point out that you're only as reliable as your last
> backup. I'm not sure exactly where to say this.
[snip]
>
Hmph. Backups are for mitigation against a catastrophic failure
destroying or corrupting main storage. And even then:
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Release is scheduled for Monday.
>
> I'd like to remind people that the pre-release tarball is available from
> the ftp servers under /pub/stable_snapshot ...
I find nothing under pub/stable_snapshot. I do fi
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm stuck on something stupid.
>
> I'm trying to use perl to open up a database handle and I can't find the
> right database dsn string.
>
> my $data_source = "dbi:Pg:mydatabase";
> my $username = "mydatebasereader";
> my $auth = "secret";
>
> my $dbh
"Campano, Troy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm trying to set up PostgreSQL for proof of concept according to our
> standards.
> I need to create a user for database01 that has the ability to create
> any objects they want.
> They can create tables, views, indexes, etc.
>
> Then I n
"Scot L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Yes I have tried it without quoting the PGDATA2. Same result.
>
> I have also tried the full path but the flag is apparently not set to
> allow that.
>
> Besides the error I am getting it appears to me that postmaster would
> not be able
>
> Dear Friends
>
> As Subject
>
> How to resolve, since i use with out problem on postgresql 7.3
Don't know, being as I know I've turned off autocommit within
Perl, and I'm *fairly* sure I've done so playing around with
psql, and it&
o accomplish this.
But, again, your backup MX is probably doing no more for you than
causing you to agonize over which different way to break the mail
system or irritate unwitting, innocent 3rd parties ;). Better to
just rid yourself of the backup MX, IMO.
--
Jim Seymour
>
> Jim Seymour wrote:
> > Karsten Hilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>If you follow this sage advice you'll open up your financial
> >>data to anyone happening to have an account on the machine in
> >>question. Anyone. Not just people wh
operating
system, IIRC. I actually was nearly a UniVerse DBA. Until the company
for which I worked at the time ran out of money before finishing the
deployment of their new ERP system. Took classes at a place called
JES.
--
Jim Seymour| Spammers sue anti-spammers:
[EMAIL PROTECTE
34 matches
Mail list logo
