On 17/01/2011 17:26, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On Monday 17 January 2011 8:11:20 am Jensen Somers wrote:
On 17/01/2011 16:46, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:31:45PM +0100, Jensen Somers wrote:
But, from your initial reply I understood that a user can simply browse
to my database
On 17/01/2011 16:46, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:31:45PM +0100, Jensen Somers wrote:
But, from your initial reply I understood that a user can simply browse
to my database installation folder (e.g.: C:/ProgramData/MyApp/data),
read out and/or modify a configuration file
Hi,
On 17/01/2011 14:49, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/17/2011 06:46 PM, Jensen Somers wrote:
Once a recording session is completed the data should be locked and not
modified anymore. And everything should be local on the user's PC, I
can't use an external database server.
Hi,
On 15/01/2011 14:21, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/14/2011 03:45 PM, Jensen Somers wrote:
Bundling it as part of my application is even better. I didn't knew if
that would be possible, but it would solve some of the issues. Mainly
data protection. The data that needs to be stored should n
Hi,
On 14/01/2011 7:35, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 01/14/2011 06:26 AM, Jensen Somers wrote:
I know that some applications (Poker Tracker 3 is the first one that
comes to my mind)
It's not a good example, either, as demonstrated by the number of
questions that pop up about it on this list
Hi,
I am looking into using PostgreSQL as a database service in a desktop
application since it's one of the support local database systems by
DataObjects.net and has more features and higher limitations than SQL
server express. I prefer a database versus a traditional binary data
file, but I