> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Marlowe) writes:
> > About the security thing. Security is a process, and you won't get
> > it from using two different database engines.
>
> I'd argue that security is an "emergent property" which is either
> supported by or undermined by particular facts/features/confi
Yes, I read this opinion that MySQL is only sql interface to filesystem
:-)
I plan to use win1250 encoding because this is native czech windows
encoding (I do not understand why M$ invents the wheel and invents new
code pages (cp1250) although the code page latin2 was here all the
time). BTW czech
All opinions here sound good so I decided to use only one db engine
(PostgreSQL 8.1) and two databases; now I must tune my database
generator parameters (I use PowerDesigner by Sybase) in order to
work-arround the pg's identifier case sensitivity (newsgroups app (php
scripts) doesn't use quotes (de
My "sixth sense" tells me that PostgreSQL is better than MySQL,
therefore for main app I prefer PostgreSQL; but I am in doubt to run
only one db engine for two databases. But my "inner space" tells me to
separate newsgroups system and company data system and run two
different db engines - in light
I read many web pages about both PostgreSQL and MySQL, I read also
"case studies" at pg web, but I prefer opinions of real users :-) I
installed both db engines on my PC three weeks ago and now I test it.
But I'm sure there should be "features" that I am not able to catch
(e.g. MIN() function speed
n
database?
Best Regards
IvoD
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
