[GENERAL] issue, dumping and restoring tables with table inheritance can alter column order

Hi, Im running: PostgreSQL 9.4.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20150212 (Red Hat 4.9.2-6), 64-bit I make use of table inheritance. I've created a table, added a child table, and after that added a column to the parent table (example code below). As you can see below

Re: [GENERAL] to_char with locale decimal separator

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 07/30/2013 03:03 AM, Ingmar Brouns wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Ingmar Brouns wrote: > > >>> >> >> anyone? Giving a locale corresponding textual representation >> of a

Re: [GENERAL] to_char with locale decimal separator

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Ingmar Brouns wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ingmar Brouns wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need to convert some numerical values to text using the decimal >> separator that corresponds to the current locale. However, I do >>

Re: [GENERAL] to_char with locale decimal separator

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 07/29/2013 04:24 AM, Ingmar Brouns wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I need to convert some numerical values to text using the decimal >> separator that corresponds to the current locale. However, I do >> not w

Re: [GENERAL] to_char with locale decimal separator

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ingmar Brouns wrote: > Hi, > > I need to convert some numerical values to text using the decimal > separator that corresponds to the current locale. However, I do > not want to lose information by padding with zero decimals or > truncating z

[GENERAL] to_char with locale decimal separator

Hi, I need to convert some numerical values to text using the decimal separator that corresponds to the current locale. However, I do not want to lose information by padding with zero decimals or truncating zero decimals. So I basically want a text cast that also replaces the dot by a comma. I've

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres case insensitive searches

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote: > bhanu udaya wrote: What is the best way of doing case insensitive searches in postgres using Like. >>> >>> Table "laurenz.t" >>> Column | Type | Modifiers >>> +-+--- >>> id | integer | not null >>> val | text

Re: [GENERAL] Get / Set Composite Type Fields within triggers

> My problem is inside triggers: How can I set or get type field values for > NEW or OLD? (I need it to check users permissions at row level, etc.) > > I tried NEW.((created).by), NEW.(created.by), NEW.created.by and nothing > works... > > Could you help me please? > > Thanks in advance. > Martin

[GENERAL] volatile void returning function not executed as often as expected in sql function

I have a volatile void returning function that I call in the SELECT clause of a query. When I execute the query, the function is called for every row in the result, this is also what I expect. However, if I embed that same query in an sql function and then call that function it gets executed only o

[GENERAL] Re: volatile void returning function not executed as often as expected in sql function

When I send the mail, I saw it, the problem is that the function should return setof void instead of void, then it works, sorry for bothering. pv=# --increase every a in foo by 1, but now in function create or replace function foofunc2() returns setof void as $func$ select foofunc(a) from foo

[GENERAL] volatile void returning function not executed as often as expected in sql function

Hi, I have a volatile void returning function that I call in the SELECT clause of a query. When I execute the query, the function is called for every row in the result, this is also what I expect. However, if I embed that same query in an sql function and then call that function it gets executed o

[GENERAL] The semantics of (NULL,NULL) vs NULL

Hi, I have a question. As I noted that (null,null) is null, I thought why put (null,null) in an array when that is the same as putting null in there. However, when trying to unnest that array I got an error when using null instead of the tuple. I experimented a bit, and read the documentation on

[GENERAL] set returning functions and resultset order

r in these cases is guaranteed. Is there a more general statement that could be made, something like: If you use only set returning functions, and do not join their results, then the returning order of the individual functions will be respected? Thanks in advance, Ingmar Brouns

[GENERAL] variadic array arguments, can it work?

y[3,4] ); ^ HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might need to add explicit type casts. I suspect this has to do something with multiple dimensional arrays not truly being arrays of arrays... Kind regards, Ingmar Brouns ve

[GENERAL] concat(NULL,NULL) returns empty string

nowhere. I found this behavior not immediately clear from the documentation.. Kind regards, Ingmar Brouns

Re: [GENERAL] Query performs badly with materialize node

> > In short: if you want to get useful commentary on your problem, you > need to provide a more complete picture. > >                        regards, tom lane > I've posted the query plans now several times to this list, but they do not show up, almost as if being caught by a spam filter or somet

[GENERAL] Query performs badly with materialize node

Hi, I have a query for which PostgreSQL 9.0.3 and 9.1 rc1 both come up with what seems to be a very bad plan when materialize is enabled. The plan with materialize takes 5 seconds to execute, the plan without 7 ms. Part of the plan with materialization enabled #effectively loop over all rows in

[GENERAL] Thread scheduling in postgresql 8.1.3 on windows

I'm writing my thesis on performance testing. First I had postgresql 8.0.1 installed. However when stress testing with multiple threads I got an unacceptable amount of context switches. Thats why I installed 8.1.3 . With 8.1.3 I dont have the context switch problem, however now there is a problem w