criteria will check. (One way to perform that is to check on
application layer but I think it is not good idea)
Regards,
Hung Phan
.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Hung Phan wrote:
> > I used tablespace to store data and it seems to be that pg_rewind copied
> > everthing in the tablespace. Today I found an article posted by you
> (Michael
> &g
so, is there
anyway to work around ?
Regards,
Hung Phan
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Hung Phan wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Please do not top-post. This breaks the logic of the thread.
>
> > I use ver 9.5.3.
>
PG_9.5_201510051/16387/16665",
offset 500, size 100
received chunk for file "pg_tblspc/16386/PG_9.5_201510051/16387/16665",
offset 600, size 100
received chunk for file "pg_tblspc/16386/PG_9.5_201510051/16387/16665",
offset 700, size 100
received chunk
just show additional bunch of
files copied in directories like base or pg_tblspc. I claim that there is
no data inserted of modified from the first step. The only difference
between two server is caused by restarting old master.
Thanks and Regards,
Hung Phan
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Micha
with progress option
The pg_rewind ran successfully but I saw it copied more than 4GB (4265891
kB copied). So I wonder there was very minor difference between two servesr
but why did pg_rewind copy almost all data of new master?
Regards,
Hung Phan
