that
- the dictionary table already consists of ~200K records
- the patch could be ~1-50K of records long
Thanks!
--
Eugene N Dzhurinsky
pgpbp5vcVZ4XQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eter. Then truncate existing dictionary table and COPY the data from the
merged file into it.
Is it what you've meant?
Thank you!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgpQFsOplL4EJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ks really promising, thank you John! I need only one index on the
"patch_data" table, and I will re-use the existing index on the "dictionary".
Thanks again!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgpY2gxa8nKur.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uot; table on
"series" column. But perhaps it's better to try this and if a performance will
go really bad - then do some optimizations, like partitioning etc.
Thank you!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgp4hwQD7LkHm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d that
- the dictionary table already consists of ~200K records
- the patch could be ~1-50K of records long
- records could not be removed from the dictionary, only added if not exist
Thanks!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgpsmOWtdvXCS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
me data could be lost from export files sequence. And that is not good
at all.
I will appreciate any suggestions on how to solve this problem. I.e. how can I
(within the export transaction) select all the data that was updated since the
last export?
Thanks.
Eugene.
t are some of the things to watch out for?
Secondly, which commercial support vendor would you recommend? I found
EnterpriseDB and CommandPrompt, but I don't know anything about them. Any other
candidates?
thanks,
Eugene
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@post
t are some of the things to
watch out for?
Secondly, which commercial support vendor would you recommend? I found
EnterpriseDB and CommandPrompt, but I don't know anything about them. Any other
candidates?
thanks,
Eugene
Tom Lane wrote:
> What do you consider "selected"? Given a view defined as
>
> select a, b, c+d as sum from tab where e > 42;
>
> what output are you wishing for?
>
> AFAIR the dependency mechanism will treat a,b,c,d,e alike. To do more
> you'd need to grovel through the pg_rewrite express
Hi,
is there any way to get comment meta-information for columns in a
view? I mean, suppose I have several tables and some of their columns
have comments, then I define a view on these tables, and what I want
is to somehow retrieve comments (if any) for those columns which are
selected in a view.
I
On Apr 11, 7:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Merlin Moncure") wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2007 00:25:50 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I wonder if there's a way to use COPY FROM command when dealing with a
> > data file containing records whose fields are delimited with z
Hi all,
I wonder if there's a way to use COPY FROM command when dealing with a
data file containing records whose fields are delimited with zero-
byte? Or I'd better change the delimiter? :)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list
.
--
Thanks,
Eugene Prokopiev
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
S | TEXAS|
TYLER | 32.3511| -95.2922| 75701 | HOWE-BAKER ENGINEERS
INCORPORATED | -
(1 row)
detectlo_db=>
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:33:41 +0200, James Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 28, 2005, at 4:24 PM, Eugene wrote:
THIS is what I get
[snip ]
So
ARCHAR(5),
ipISP VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
ipDOMAIN VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL
);
I've indexed first two columns they are IPfrom, IPto also table is btree
version of postgre is 7.4.8, on hosting
I ask db like this SELECT * FROM ipdb2 WHERE '3229285376' BETWEEN ipfrom
AND ipto;
d by command, i can do this way
mysql> LOAD DATA INFILE
"/IP-COUNTRY-REGION-CITY-LAT-LONG-ZIPCODE-ISP-DOMAIN.CSV" INTO TABLE
IPCITYLATLONGISPDOMAIN FIELDS TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"' LINES
TERMINATED BY '\r\n';
ENCLOSED BY '"' hel
ts? Is it bug? Can it be configured?
--
Thanks,
Eugene Prokopiev
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
actually, I'm using postgresql 7.3.2. I noticed there were some hash index
fixes in 7.4, so that might be it. Would there be any other reason for this
deadlock? This database has been in production for almost 2 years and this is
the first time we've seen the problem.
thank
: http://rafb.net/paste/results/W35ccD49.html
thanks,
Eugene
>
> From: Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/08/18 Thu PM 08:52:17 EST
> To: Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] total db lockup
>
> On T
Guys, I really need help on this. Can whoever is in charge of the mailing list
change it so that it doesn't delete my messages?
thanks,
Eugene
>
> From: Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/08/18 Thu PM 04:45:58 EST
> To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC:
It seems that I can't. For whatever reason, my messages are being blocked.
Eugene
>
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/08/18 Thu PM 02:11:54 EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] total db lockup
>
770403
(1 row)
user1=# select count(*) from t_content where
validlivesitecontent(publisher, contenttype, status) = true;
count
-
1258365
(1 row)
Thanks!
--Eugene Barlow
TripAdvisor - www.tripadvisor.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: i
. Perhaps a locale setting is in order?
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
If there's one or more indexes on a table that gets TRUNCATEd, are those
indexes automatically updated as expected from INSERTs and DELETEs?
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list arc
7.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust
However, instead of being denied outright, I can connect to the default
port from the outside world. In the logs, it shows up as an entry with
a datetime stamp and a message "Invalid packet length". Is this normal
PostgreSQL behavior?
Any suggestions are appreciated.
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 03:24:56PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker ÐÉÛÅÔ:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Eugene Karpachov wrote:
>
> > Excuse me, but why postgresql team doesn't release patches? I mean something
> > like postgresql-7.0-7.0.1.diff.gz etc. It is big waste of traffic to down
26 matches
Mail list logo