Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Replication

2005-02-18 Thread Dieter Schröder
Thank you for the links. Based on the resources and reviews I found online, Slony looks like the best solution. Am disappointed that these systems are not better reviewed online (it really helps with convincing management). We sold them on postgresql, but we need to sell them that the replication

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Replication

2005-02-18 Thread Dieter Schröder
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:15:21 -0800, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The first three are all open source, the last one is not, but the source > > code is available to customers, and should the project be abandoned or > > the company go under it is promised to be released under an o

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Replication

2005-02-18 Thread Dieter Schröder
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:58:08 -0600, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 10:40, Dieter Schröder wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I am currently migrating a few oracle servers to postgre sql and > > management wants us to have repli

[GENERAL] PostgreSQL Replication

2005-02-18 Thread Dieter Schröder
Hello all, I am currently migrating a few oracle servers to postgre sql and management wants us to have replication. We have found information about the slony replicator with blog posts and articles. We have not found any other replication systems reviewed, so it slony the best tool for the job?