[Re] Re: [Re] Re: [Re] Re: [Re] Re: [GENERAL] Unknown winsock error 10061while dumping a big database

2007-11-29 Thread Cyril VELTER
De : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cyril VELTER wrote: > > > > Is length() supposed to return the very high length in case of > > corruption ? > > You'd have thought it would. The odd thing (if it is data corruption) is > that you would expect to see s

[Re] Re: [Re] Re: [Re] Re: [GENERAL] Unknown winsock error 10061while dumping a big database

2007-11-28 Thread Cyril VELTER
De : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Cyril VELTER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The server have 4G of ram. But doing a search in the source code it > > does not > > seem that these values are used during a copy operation. > > They aren't. T

[Re] Re: [Re] Re: [GENERAL] Unknown winsock error 10061while dumping a big database

2007-11-28 Thread Cyril VELTER
De : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cyril VELTER wrote: > > > > maintenance_work_mem and work_mem are set to their default value (16M / 1M). > > Does Copy use any of these values ? The doc only state sort operations for > > work_mem and vacuum / create index /

[GENERAL] Unknown winsock error 10061while dumping a big database

2007-11-27 Thread Cyril VELTER
C locale. This table have several fields which can be pretty large (the biggest row is ~35MB). Any ideas ? Cyril VELTER ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose a

[Re] Re: [Re] Re: [GENERAL] Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

2007-05-30 Thread Cyril VELTER
De : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cyril VELTER wrote: > > OK, I've the results of my tests : > > > > With the previous code, then message "SOCKERROR" is printed 5 times > > during the > > whole process (100 Gb dump import with psql). The

[Re] Re: [GENERAL] Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

2007-05-28 Thread Cyril VELTER
> Cyril VELTER wrote: > > > >>> Cyril VELTER wrote: > >>>> Searching the source files, it seems the error message is generated in > >>>> port/win32/socket.c line 594. > >>> Right, but the important thing is which path down to t

Re: [GENERAL] Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

2007-05-25 Thread Cyril VELTER
> > Cyril VELTER wrote: > > > > > > Searching the source files, it seems the error message is generated in > > > port/win32/socket.c line 594. > > > > Right, but the important thing is which path down to that function is it > >

[Re] Re: [Re] Re: [Re] Re: [GENERAL] Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

2007-05-24 Thread Cyril VELTER
> Cyril VELTER wrote: > >> Cyril VELTER wrote: > >>> No I'm not. It's not even complied in the server nor in the pg_dump > > binary. > >>> The server is built on windows using MSYS simply with ./configure && make > > a

[Re] Re: [Re] Re: [GENERAL] Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

2007-05-22 Thread Cyril VELTER
> Cyril VELTER wrote: > > No I'm not. It's not even complied in the server nor in the pg_dump binary. > > > > The server is built on windows using MSYS simply with ./configure && > > make all > > && make install > >

[Re] Re: [GENERAL] Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

2007-05-13 Thread Cyril VELTER
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > Cyril VELTER wrote: > > > > I'm trying to upgrade a pretty big database (60G) from postgres 8.0 to > > postgres 8.2 on windows 2000 Server (both version running on the same machine > > on different ports). During the migratio

[GENERAL] Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

2007-05-12 Thread Cyril VELTER
I'm trying to upgrade a pretty big database (60G) from postgres 8.0 to postgres 8.2 on windows 2000 Server (both version running on the same machine on different ports). During the migration process, I always get an error at some point (never the same) : LOG: could not receive

Re: [GENERAL] Dump 7.1.3->7.4.2

2004-05-30 Thread Cyril VELTER
From: "Doug McNaught" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Cyril VELTER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm trying to dump a database from a 7.1.3 server to a 7.4.2 one. > > > > It doesn't works because of difference in COP

[GENERAL] Prepared queries

2004-02-11 Thread Cyril VELTER
I'm converting an application to use the V3 protocol features in the 7.4 libpq. As I need to make a design choice regarding the use of prepared statements, I'm wondering what ressources does a prepared statement use on the server ? If I need to create several hundred in each backend, is there a big