Angel Alvarez wrote:
Well
but the RFC's were in fact prior to thunderbird
So for he most of its life, when few people was using it,
Thiunderbird was a sad example of your botched attempt of creating a
standar of NOT FOLLOWING THE RFC's...
But, as I mentioned, nobody cares about this particu
Angel Alvarez wrote:
What's such most advanced mail reader??
No one, ive seen, seems to be perfect nor thunderbird.
By the way kmail has 4 options (reply, reply to all, reply to author, reply to list)
in addition to be able to use list headers included in the message.
in fact many other mail-
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mikkel is right, every other well-organized mailing list I've ever been on
handles things the sensible way he suggests, but everybody on his side
who's been on lists here for a while already knows this issue is a dead
horse. Since I use the most advanced e-mail client on
I resent that you're trying to make this a personal thing.
I was going to answer the rest of this email, then I realized that the
real problem was right here, and discussing anything else was dancing
around the issue and wasting time.
You can resent it or not, but this _is_ a personal th
Lewis Cunningham wrote:
--- Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-users
There really aren't any other groups of people. "people who want to
talk about
There are hackers (contribute to PostgreSQL), DBAs (administer the
database), Developers (write application to
Magicloud Wang wrote:
Dear,
I think database has its own operation journal, and different journal
filesystem does give different performance. So if I put database file on a
non-journal filesystem, would it be safe? Does this like using a raw device?
You lose a little bit of data integrit
I agree with Joshua on this point. It's entirely possible to discuss
this without resorting to immaturity. If you make a decent point, then
diminish it by cursing or insulting everybody here, you've lost the
point and it's effectiveness entirely.
Yes, once again, I apologize. At times I se
I felt I was 'responding in kind' wrt 'it really irritates me when
people cry like 4 year olds about top posting. It's not that bad, get
over it.' posting. My apologies if I've taken it to a level of rude
that it had not already reached.
I suppose that the post was probably directed at
Geoffrey wrote:
Collin Kidder wrote:
I have to suffer through dealing with people like the two of you
quoted above. You can deal with people who'd like to top post.
Anything else is just being a spoiled baby who can't deal with minor
issues. If all the energy spent crying about t
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 11:41 AM, Leif B. Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It certainly isn't a crime. But it's a bit like thread hijacking in the
sense that a well-formed inline posting is more likely to attract
intelligent replies. I don't think that I'm the only one who t
My point is: with top-posting I don't care how many lines were repeated
because I don't have to scroll.
Considering there is an RFC that recommends inline posting over
top-posting (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855), and considering the
fact that this topic has been beat to death on do
This is offtopic but there is nothing wrong with top posting. Is there a
mail list policy on it or are you just picky about it?
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On 11/6/07, Reg Me Please <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That seems not to be the case.
The last line has a \. by its own and the last but one is
12 matches
Mail list logo
