Greetings everyone.
I would like to know what the correct position is on the use of Postgres with
DJB's daemontools or other monitoring prgrams?
I tried to set it up the other day and was successful in getting it to start
and log, and even refresh the config files, but I could not get it to
sh
On May 24, 2007 01:02:42 pm John D. Burger wrote:
> Tilmann Singer wrote:
> > We are using this data which seems to be fairly extensive and
> > accurate, and is free:
> >
> > http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html/gis_countryfiles.htm
>
> We use that, but it is only non-US, so we combine it with this:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 13:02, John D. Burger wrote:
>
> We also have a hodge-podge of other sources, but those are the main
> ones. (By the way, we have found USGS to very amenable to dumping
> their data in arbitrary ways. Those state files essentially try to
> fit everything into a single CSV
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 18:59, you wrote:
>
> I don't believe this is good design. You'll have to have a trigger or
> something to verify that the country_id+state_id on the city table are
> exactly equal to the country_id+state_id on the state table. If you
> don't, you might have something li
which, if you are using a similar database what source did you use
for geographic data? I'm having troubles with a reliable set.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck D.
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2
Greetings all,
I have a couple issues regarding geographic names databases.
1) The first is this. I have 3 tables. Country, state and city. Country has
a country_id to identify a country, state has a state_id and country_id to
identify a state, and city has a city_id, state_id and country_id
