, Bernardo Telles wrote:
> Hi Pavel, I'm running 8.4
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> 2011/5/16 Bernardo Telles :
>> > Wow, you guys are some fast-acting dudes (and yes, I am an adult, but a
>> kid
>
Hi Pavel, I'm running 8.4
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2011/5/16 Bernardo Telles :
> > Wow, you guys are some fast-acting dudes (and yes, I am an adult, but a
> kid
> > at heart).
> >
> > David, yup, that's exa
“append” are synonyms in this context; otherwise the above
> quote from section 39.6.1 is basically a word-for-word answer to your
> question.
>
>
>
> David J.
>
>
>
> *From:* pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:
> pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] *On Beh
queries. Someone mentioned that one
way to do that is to use a temporary table inside the partiesWithin
function. Any thoughts?
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:28 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/15/11 8:53 PM, Bernardo Telles wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>> We'd like to use a plpgsql
Hi there,
We'd like to use a plpgsql function to use results from query A to execute
several queries B, C, etc., and return the results of all B, C, etc queries
as one result set. Would placing 'RETURN QUERY' inside a loop automatically
concatenate all 'return query' results in the function's retur