Re: [GENERAL] max_stack_depth problem though query is substantially smaller

2016-04-10 Thread Bannert Matthias
e on that operator being deprecated? regards, matt bannert From: Tom Lane [t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 5:25 PM To: Bannert Matthias Cc: Charles Clavadetscher; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] max_stack_depth pr

Re: [GENERAL] max_stack_depth problem though query is substantially smaller

2016-04-10 Thread Bannert Matthias
AD/postgresql-9.3-9.3.11/build/../src/backend/main/main.c:227 Detaching from program: /usr/lib/postgresql/9.3/bin/postgres, process 1521 Is this of any help at all? I really how you can get almost 70 MB done and I can't even get 2-5 MB done. Maybe you can share a brief part of you 70 MB quer

Re: [GENERAL] max_stack_depth problem though query is substantially smaller

2016-04-10 Thread Bannert Matthias
. Thanks for the pointer to the stack trace backend. I'll try to set that up and report what I find. From: Tom Lane [t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:39 PM To: Bannert Matthias Cc: Charles Clavadetscher; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Su

Re: [GENERAL] max_stack_depth problem though query is substantially smaller

2016-04-08 Thread Bannert Matthias
ge and thus a query string that only has 1.7 MB exceeds the stack ? From: Tom Lane [t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 4:20 PM To: Charles Clavadetscher Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Bannert Matthias Subject: Re: [GENERAL] max_stack_