Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Michal Kozusznik
> wrote:
>> On 6.9.2016 11:51, Dave Page wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Attila Soki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> i testing pgadmin4 (rc1) and noticed that the que
> Am 06.09.2016 um 15:23 schrieb Adrian Klaver :
>
> On 09/06/2016 02:35 AM, Attila Soki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i testing the latest release of pgadmin4 (rc1) and noticed that the query
>> tool is significantly slower than the query tool in pgadmin3.
>>
Hi,
i testing the latest release of pgadmin4 (rc1) and noticed that the query tool
is significantly slower than the query tool in pgadmin3.
i am not sure if this occurs only on my computer or only under os x (10.10.5)
or is this a known behavior.
how to repeat:
create table test1 (a int, t tex
> On 30 May 2016, at 02:43, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> On 29/05/2016 22:10, Attila Soki wrote:
>> i am about to begin with postgresql plugin development.
>> H Currently i'm trying to become somewhat familiar with the postgresql
>> sources.
>
>>
>>
cated with palloc).
There will be approx. 1000 unique oid/pointer pairs.
Basically, what i want is, to be able to get the pointer to my struct by Oid.
Is there is a suitable hashmap or key-value storage solution in the pg code?
if so, please point me to the right part of the source.
thanks,
Attila
hi all,
the automatic update for views is really a helpful feature, but i think it
would be more useful with returning support.
currently we have to construct a rule/trigger to support queries like
'insert into simple_view returning pk'
is it possible (or desired) to implement something like an
