Re: [GENERAL] Can't connect to Windows port + other

2004-09-01 Thread Anony Mous
ame in Win. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 1, 2004 5:19 PM To: Anony Mous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Can't connect to Windows port + other "Anony Mous" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If so, w

Re: [GENERAL] Problem to connect to the Windows Port

2004-08-26 Thread Anony Mous
l ::1 ::::::: trust Once I removed the IPv6-style line, then I could add my own IP + Mask combination and it worked fine (in my case this is 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0) Perhaps upon installation the IPv6 line should be "remmed" out by default? -Original Message----- F

Re: [GENERAL] Problem to connect to the Windows Port

2004-08-26 Thread Anony Mous
I've been watching this thread because I am experience exactly the same thing. I can also repeat all the diagnostic results of Conni. Postmaster resides on a Win 2K box. I can telnet to the server no problem. My pg_hba file line entries will allow access from all hosts, all users, all databases

Re: [GENERAL] select count(*) from pg_stat_activity in V8.0.0

2004-08-19 Thread Anony Mous
g the number of connections to the backend? Thanks Peter -Original Message- From: Richard Huxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 19, 2004 2:21 AM To: Anony Mous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] select count(*) from pg_stat_activity in V8.0.0 Anony Mous wrote: > Comin

Re: [GENERAL] setting local time without restarting server

2004-05-13 Thread Anony Mous
, and then re-start the postmaster. Sorry, I should have clarified this in my first e-mail. -Peter -Original Message- From: Bruno Wolff III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 13, 2004 2:07 PM To: Anony Mous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] setting local time without restart

[GENERAL] setting local time without restarting server

2004-05-13 Thread Anony Mous
Hi, Is there a function that would allow me to set the local time while the server is running? I can't seem to find anything on this... Thanks, Peter ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://arch

Re: [GENERAL] FW: Postgres alongside MS SQL Server

2004-04-22 Thread Anony Mous
nd will take precedence when the OS doles out CPU resources. How is it possible for Postgresql to "freak out" and take out the machine? Replies are greatly appreciated. -Peter -Original Message- From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 22, 2004 10:09 AM To:

Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump "what if?"

2004-03-24 Thread Anony Mous
That sounds like a great solution...thank you! My win API knowledge is weak, but I'll give it a try. Thanks again. -Pete -Original Message- From: Shelby Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 24, 2004 4:30 PM To: Anony Mous; 'Dustin Sallings' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump "what if?"

2004-03-24 Thread Anony Mous
useless if the file represented an incomplete dump.     -Original Message- From: Dustin Sallings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 24, 2004 1:26 PM To: Anony Mous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump "what if?"   On Mar 24, 2004, at 11:42, Anony Mous w

[GENERAL] pg_dump "what if?"

2004-03-24 Thread Anony Mous
Hi,   I’m running pg_dump 7.3.4.  I have a nightly process that dumps a database via pg_dump, and then checks for the existence of the dumped file afterwards to confirm that the dump actually occurred.  Just wondering, however, if a corrupt disk prevented pg_dump from executing fully, wou

Re: [GENERAL] Two joins on same foreign key

2004-01-31 Thread Anony Mous
I must say, I'm really appreciative with the responses from this list. Thanks to all! -Original Message- From: elein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 31, 2004 12:10 PM To: Anony Mous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Two joins on same foreign key PostgreSQL Ge

Re: [GENERAL] Two joins on same foreign key

2004-01-30 Thread Anony Mous
m: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 30, 2004 11:21 PM To: Anony Mous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Two joins on same foreign key On Jan 31, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Anony Mous wrote: > Table #1 > employee_id (pk) > employee_name  > > Table #2