Hi ,
The installer has an error dealing with directory separator char on windows
platform, it seems the installer causes the server looking for configuration
file path with /, it should be \. Hoping Enterprisedb engineers can see
this message.
From: "Joshua Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:27 PM
To: "Amber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] What's size of your PostgreSQL Database?
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
> Yahoo has a 2PB Postgres single instance Postgres database (modified
> engine), but the biggest pure Pg single instance I've heard of is 4TB.
> The 4TB database has the additional interesting property in that they've
> done none of the standard "scalable" architecture changes (such as
> partition
> 8. We have a master and a replica. We have plans to move to a
> cluster/grid Soon(TM). It's not an emergency and Postgres can easily
> handle and scale to a 3TB database on reasonable hardware (<$30k).
>
I'd like to know what's your progress of choosing the cluster/grid solution, we
are also
We know PostgreSQL uses one dedicated server process to serve one client
connection, what we want to know is whether PostgreSQL use multiple threads
inside agents processes to take advantage of multiple CPUs. In our site we have
only a few concurrent connections, so what occurs inside agent proc
2008 8:39 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL TPC-H test result?
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:59:49PM +0800, Amber wrote:
>
>> I read something from
>> http://monetdb.cwi.nl/projects/monetdb/SQL/Benchmark/TPCH/index.html
>
> Given that the point of that "study
I read something from
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/projects/monetdb/SQL/Benchmark/TPCH/index.html saying
that PostgreSQL can't give the correct result of the some TPC-H queries, I
wonder is there any official statements about this, because it will affect our
plane of using PostgreSQL as an alternative
right?
--
From: "Amber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 9:51 PM
To: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] What's size of your PostgreSQL Database?
>
>
&
> On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 11:42 +0800, Amber wrote:
>> Dear all:
>> We are currently considering using PostgreSQL to host a read only
>> warehouse, we would like to get some experiences, best practices and
>> performance metrics from the user community, following
>> 7. How many concurrent readers of your database, and what's the average
>> transfer rate, suppose all readers are doing one table scaning.
>
> Concurrent but idle connections in production are around 600. Active
> connections at a time are in the dozens. I can read at about 60 to 70
> Megs a
Dear all:
We are currently considering using PostgreSQL to host a read only
warehouse, we would like to get some experiences, best practices and
performance metrics from the user community, following is the question list:
1. What's size of your database?
2. What Operating System are you using
11 matches
Mail list logo
