On Aug 9, 10:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
> Do you have comparable work_mem settings on both machines? Another
> thing to look at, if any of the sort key columns are textual, is whether
> the lc_collate settings are the same.
work_mem is commented out in both postgresql.conf files:
Here's the output from explain analyze.
My desktop:
-
Unique (cost=6732.86..7380.50 rows=504 width=677) (actual
time=844.345..1148.705 rows=65 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=6732.86..6773.34 rows=16191 width=677) (actual
time=844.341..1099.446 rows=16191 loops=1)
Sort Key:
I'm having an issue with a specific query, and I don't really know
where to start figuring out what's going on. I'm pretty new to
PostgreSQL in specific, and I'm not much of a database/SQL guru in
general. I've got one query that is consistently taking 10X longer to
run on a production machine than