Hello Scott,
Wednesday, March 15, 2006, 8:49:00 PM, you wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 13:36, Abbath wrote:
>> Hello Richard,
>>
>> Wednesday, March 15, 2006, 3:35:26 PM, you wrote:
>> > If you want to force the data to be cached, just put a cron-job in to
>>
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 15, 2006, 3:35:26 PM, you wrote:
> Abbath wrote:
>> is slow for the first time (7-15 sec), but then using the same keyword
>> next time it is fast (10-100 ms). The reason is, as I read, first time
>> it is not cached at all, but next tim
me at 1 million records,
I think it is not a big expectation nowadays)
Abbath
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
ust use the "beg" (or "beg*" ) search expression.
> Potentially yes, but without index support and it's needed to write your
> operator/function.
Could You write some sample how do You mean?
Thanks in advance.
--
Abbath
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
27;like':3 'match':5 'begin':7 ...etc" then it
would be cool to create a query, which give me a headline for "begin" if I
just use the "beg" (or "beg*" ) search expression.
Is there a way to solve this?
Thanks in advance.
Abbath
-
