On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Venkata Balaji N writes:
> > "make" command is generating the following error while compiling
> > postgresql-9.5.3 on Solaris SPARC.
>
> > Undefined first referenced
> > symbol in file
> > atomic
> On May 20, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Guyren Howe wrote:
>
> On May 20, 2016, at 13:38 , Pierre Chevalier Géologue
> wrote:
>>
>> Le 04/05/2016 18:29, Szymon Lipiński a écrit :
>>> On the other hand, when I was trying to store all my logic in a
>>> database, there was just one thing that made me hat
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Juhasz writes:
> >
> > We've found a situation where canceling a query may cause the
> > client to
> > hang, possibly indefinitely. This can happen if the network
> > connection
> > fails in a specific way.
> > ...
> > However, if the net
Interesting conversation.
While reading it, I sort of regret the times when a single guy was in
charge of the whole thing, and managed to simply make it work, using all
possible tools he had. "Informaticien" was the generic term, in French.
Every single part of the big thing he built (hardwa
On May 20, 2016, at 13:38 , Pierre Chevalier Géologue
wrote:
>
> Le 04/05/2016 18:29, Szymon Lipiński a écrit :
>> On the other hand, when I was trying to store all my logic in a
>> database, there was just one thing that made me hate it. Testing.
>> Testing the procedures inside the database wa
Le 04/05/2016 18:29, Szymon Lipiński a écrit :
On the other hand, when I was trying to store all my logic in a
database, there was just one thing that made me hate it. Testing.
Testing the procedures inside the database was not easy, not funny, and
too much time consuming.
Yes, very good point.
On Fri, 20 May 2016 09:19:08 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>I don't know much about FireBird. I (not a lawyer) think it has a very good
>license. One interesting thing is that it says that it can run as a
>"server", like PostgreSQL, or "embedded", like SQLite. But I can't really
>figure out how the "
Alex Ignatov writes:
> Why we have no warnings or errors about that we have no such grant
> after first revoke?
Yes, that's intentional. There's no warning about granting twice in
a row, either.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-genera
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:52:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "k...@rice.edu" writes:
> > The stack trace just appeared to be what I would expect while a 'DISCARD
> > ALL'
> > command was being run:
>
> > #0 0x0073bc7c in MemoryContextSetParent ()
> > #1 0x0073bde3 in MemoryConte
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> src/include/port/atomics/generic-sunpro.h cites these references
> as authority for believing that those functions exist in Solaris:
>
>http://www.unix.com/man-page/opensolaris/3c/atomic_cas/
>http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-
Venkata Balaji N writes:
> "make" command is generating the following error while compiling
> postgresql-9.5.3 on Solaris SPARC.
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> atomic_cas_64 port/atomics.o
> atomic_cas_32
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Jan de Visser wrote:
> I would suggest reporting this on pgsql-hackers. I know some work was done on
> the atomics over the last little while.
If that's an issue (no sparc environment here), we're looking at
b64d92f1 here that was new stuff in 9.5.
--
Michael
On Friday, May 20, 2016 3:14:54 PM EDT Venkata Balaji N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "make" command is generating the following error while compiling
> postgresql-9.5.3 on Solaris SPARC.
>
> I tried compiling 9.2 and 9.3, works fine. This is only happening on 9.5.
... snip ...
>
> Regards,
> Venkata B N
>
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:17 AM, aluka raju wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> 1) We are building an application where it needs a SQL engine to process
> the data. We are evaluating whether to use postgreSQL along with the
> foreign data wrappers. Can you please help us in letting know if postgreSQL
> can be u
El 20/05/16 a las 10:19, Leonardo M. Ramé escribió:
El 19/05/16 a las 12:39, Saiful Muhajir escribió:
This has happened to us where we have dead or unmanaged consumer. Turns
out londiste is keeping the event even if the consumer is unreachable.
This is to ensure that the consumer gets what it sh
El 19/05/16 a las 12:39, Saiful Muhajir escribió:
This has happened to us where we have dead or unmanaged consumer. Turns
out londiste is keeping the event even if the consumer is unreachable.
This is to ensure that the consumer gets what it should.
To clean this up, delete the unused/dead consu
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:17 AM, aluka raju
> wrote:
>
>> Hello ,
>>
>> 1) We are building an application where it needs a SQL engine to process
>> the data. We are evaluating whether to use postgreSQL along
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:17 AM, aluka raju wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> 1) We are building an application where it needs a SQL engine to process
> the data. We are evaluating whether to use postgreSQL along with the
> foreign data wrappers. Can you please help us in letting know if postgreSQL
> can be u
Hello!
Why we have no warnings or errors about that we have no such grant
after first revoke?
postgres=> grant select(i2) on table user1.t2 to user2;
GRANT
postgres=> revoke select(i2) on table user1.t2 from user2;
REVOKE
postgres=> revoke select(i2) on table user1.t2 from user2;
REVOKE
postgr
Hello ,
1) We are building an application where it needs a SQL engine to process
the data. We are evaluating whether to use postgreSQL along with the
foreign data wrappers. Can you please help us in letting know if postgreSQL
can be used in embedded mode.
2) We want to have SQLEngine component al
20 matches
Mail list logo