Re: [GENERAL] pg_basebackup: return value 1: reason?

2016-04-16 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 04/16/2016 02:24 PM, Andrej Vanek wrote: Hello, my setup is: 1 master 1 synchronous slave (up and running) 2 asynchronous slave (up and running) Now I'm setting up asynchronous slave: first step of this setup is pg_basebackup connecting to master. Indirections are because it is encapsulated

Re: [GENERAL] pg_basebackup: return value 1: reason?

2016-04-16 Thread Andrej Vanek
Hello, > Are you not getting something informative on your display and/or sending stderr to somewher else? - in case -X fetch no informative output - in case -X stream following: pg_basebackup: could not wait for child process: No child processes Now after re-test directly from command-line it w

Re: [GENERAL] pg_basebackup: return value 1: reason?

2016-04-16 Thread Andrej Vanek
Hello, my setup is: 1 master 1 synchronous slave (up and running) 2 asynchronous slave (up and running) Now I'm setting up asynchronous slave: first step of this setup is pg_basebackup connecting to master. Indirections are because it is encapsulated in a script. This script is aimed to serve for

[GENERAL] Enhancement request for pg_dump

2016-04-16 Thread Sergei Agalakov
Hi, Currently as in PG 9.4, 9.5 the order of the statements in the script produced by pg_dump is uncertain even for the same versions of the databases and pg_dump. One database may script grants like REVOKE ALL ON TABLE contracttype FROM PUBLIC; REVOKE ALL ON TABLE contracttype FROM madmin; G