Hey Tom,
I can't reboot right now, working on a client's machine remotely, but I'l test
that tomorrow and keep you posted. Thanks for the link.
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 22:40, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I'd bet a nickel this is caused by El Capitan's "System Integrity
> Protection" deciding that your ps
Chris Ruprecht writes:
> today, I built PG 9.5.1 on my Mac. Everything went fine with the build, as
> usual but after installing everything, psql did nothing but give a 'bus
> error: 10'. Loading it into gdb gave me more details:
> Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
> 0x00010001be6
Elein Mustain
el...@varlena.com
510-637-9106
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 3:45 PM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Elein wrote:
>
>> An unused (yet) enum type cannot display the enum ranges. An empty table
>> containing that type cannot display enum ranges.
>
>
Hello friends,
today, I built PG 9.5.1 on my Mac. Everything went fine with the build, as
usual but after installing everything, psql did nothing but give a 'bus error:
10'. Loading it into gdb gave me more details:
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
0x00010001be6c in refresh_utf8f
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Elein wrote:
> An unused (yet) enum type cannot display the enum ranges. An empty table
> containing that type cannot display enum ranges.
>
Yes, it can.
CREATE TYPE rainbow AS enum ('red','orange','yellow','blue','purple');
SELECT enum_range(null::rainbow);
e
I'm getting this message repeating on the UDR node that I just added today.
Any way to get it start applying?
svp2=# select * from bdr.bdr_nodes;
node_sysid | node_timeline | node_dboid | node_status |
node_name|node_local_dsn |
node_init_from_ds
The point is that enum information belongs to a type, not a column value of
that type.
This is the difference between a class and a class instance.
If you get that, you understand.
The workaround suggested only works if some non-empty row in some table has a
column defined to be that enum
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Melvin Davidson
wrote:
> Enums are evil!
> http://www.lornajane.net/posts/2010/is-enum-evil
>
>
Using red background is evil :)
I'll disagree on the premise but will agree that without a better
implementation and handling of change our implementation makes using
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Elein wrote:
>
> > Bug/Improvement:
> >
> >Enums belong to types, not to column values.
> >
> >* Create a built in function, like enum_range( type ), independent of
> tables
> > that shows a type's enum values.
> >create or replace function en
On 3/11/2016 1:36 PM, Elein wrote:
>Bug/Improvement:
>
>Enums belong to types, not to column values
I've read this post twice, and I'm still unclear on what you're saying
is a problem, and what your proposed solution is...
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
--
Sent
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Elein wrote:
>
> > Bug/Improvement:
> >
> >Enums belong to types, not to column values.
> >
> >* Create a built in function, like enum_range( type ), independent of
> tables
> > that shows a type's enum values.
> >create or replace function en
> Bug/Improvement:
>
>Enums belong to types, not to column values.
>
>* Create a built in function, like enum_range( type ), independent of
> tables
> that shows a type's enum values.
>create or replace function enum_range( typein regtype ) returns name[]
> language sql as
Hello Giuseppe,
Thank you for your reply. After obtaining more information from our network
personnel and a little trial and error, I was able to get the pg_hba.conf file
edited correctly specifying ldap authentication against our Active Directory
domain and users can now connect. Your second
On 03/11/2016 04:27 AM, Harish Kumar Gudur (DATA GLOVE INCORPORATED DBA
TR) wrote:
*Hi Team,*
We are planning to migrate few Vendor based applications from Windows
Server 2003 to the latest server Operating System Windows Server
2012/2008. Before migration we would like to do the assessment of t
On 03/10/2016 05:07 PM, Robert McAlpine wrote:
Thank you for the quick reply.
I very recently had some success by doing a complete purge of
postgresql-9.5, reinstalling and then copying in the original data
directory (or I guess I could have just pointed to it, but w/e). I did
not expect this to
On 03/11/2016 12:19 AM, Condor wrote:
On 10-03-2016 15:37, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 03/10/2016 01:09 AM, Condor wrote:
Hello,
I using postgresql 9.5.1 and I have problem to match value in one field.
Both tables are text:
=# \d list_cards_tbl;
Column | Type |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Durgamahesh Manne
wrote:
> Hi Sir
>
> As per above discussion.GOOD response from PostgreSQL
>
> i am very happy to work on PostgreSQL.Super fast response only from postgres
> team regarding i asked any question related to postgres
>
> regards
> mahesh
>
> On Fr
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Durgamahesh Manne
wrote:
> hi
>
> the following info generating in pg_log
>
> LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
> LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
> LOG: could not receive data from client: Connect
> "Harish Kumar Gudur (DATA GLOVE INCORPORATED DBA TR)"
> hat am 11. März 2016 um 13:27 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Team,
> We are planning to migrate few Vendor based applications from Windows Server
> 2003 to the latest server Operating System Windows Server 2012/2008. Before
> migration we would
Hi Team,
We are planning to migrate few Vendor based applications from Windows Server
2003 to the latest server Operating System Windows Server 2012/2008. Before
migration we would like to do the assessment of the application and check the
supportability.
We are performing the assessment for:
Ap
I have been running the EDB benchmark that compares Postgres and MongoDB.
I believe EDB ran it against PG 9.4 and Mongo 2.6. I am running it
against PG 9.5.1 and Mongo 3.2 with WiredTiger storage using 10,000,000
JSON records generated by the benchmark. It looks like Mongo is winning,
and apparen
Hi,
Le 10/03/2016 21:10, John R Pierce a écrit :
On 3/10/2016 12:05 PM, Alka Gupta wrote:
The vendor won't give us any way to access the machine and retrieve
the DB, so I removed the HDD and connected it to my Linux laptop. I
was able to grab all the DB files and copy them to my Windows deskto
Hi Sir
As per above discussion.GOOD response from PostgreSQL
i am very happy to work on PostgreSQL.Super fast response only from
postgres team regarding i asked any question related to postgres
regards
mahesh
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/11/2016 1:50 AM, Du
On 3/11/2016 1:50 AM, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:
Thanks for quick response .as per above conversation. for which
parameter i can comment to resolve the issue & please specify the
value of parameter sir
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
your client is disconn
Hi Sir
i am very happy to work on PostgreSQL.Super fast response only from
postgres team regarding i asked any question related to postgres
regards
mahesh
On 3/11/2016 1:04 AM, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:
Connection reset by peer
that TCP/IP error means the client disconnected without cleanly closing
the socket. It can also happen if something in the network between the
client and the server dropped the connection.
--
john r pierce, recycli
hi
the following info generating in pg_log
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection
Please unsubscirbe
From: pgsql-in-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-in-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Durgamahesh Manne
Sent: 11 March 2016 09:04
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; pgsql-in-gene...@postgresql.org
Subject: [pgsql-in-general] Regarding connection drops for every
hi
the following info generating in pg_log
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection
On 10-03-2016 15:37, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 03/10/2016 01:09 AM, Condor wrote:
Hello,
I using postgresql 9.5.1 and I have problem to match value in one
field.
Both tables are text:
=# \d list_cards_tbl;
Column | Type | Modifiers
---+-+-
30 matches
Mail list logo
