On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:43:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 06:10:15PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Technically, there haven't been any complaints about either pg_dumpall's
> > behavior in this regard, or pg_upgrade's, but pg_upgrade's post-upgrade
> > scripts would
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:03:56PM -0800, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The table of which C types represent which SQL types seems to be missing
> bigint:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/xfunc-c.html#XFUNC-C-TYPE-TABLE
>
> It looks like bigint should be listed and should corr
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:29:22AM -0500, George Woodring wrote:
>
> Currently the documentation looks like:
>
> client_min_messages (enum)
>
> Controls which message levels are sent to the client. Valid values are
> DEBUG5, DEBUG4, DEBUG3, DEBUG2, DEBUG1, LOG, NOTICE, WARNING, ERROR,
Hello,
I am trying to setup table level replication with BDR 0.9.0 but I am running
into some errors. I believe I must be missing a step or two in the process.
I currently have a two node group that I want to build.
1) On node1 I have a database built with the tables I want to replicate;
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Cory Tucker wrote:
> That produces pretty much the same results as the CROSS JOIN I was using
> before. Because each "my_value" in the table are different, if I group on
> just their value then I will always have the full result set and a bunch of
> essentially d
That produces pretty much the same results as the CROSS JOIN I was using
before. Because each "my_value" in the table are different, if I group on
just their value then I will always have the full result set and a bunch of
essentially duplicated results.
Any other ideas/options?
On Thu, May 14,
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Cory Tucker wrote:
> [pg version 9.3 or 9.4]
>
> Suppose I have a simple table:
>
> create table data (
> my_value TEXT NOT NULL
> );
> CREATE INDEX idx_my_value ON data USING gin(my_value gin_trgm_ops);
>
>
> Now I would like to essentially do group by to get
[pg version 9.3 or 9.4]
Suppose I have a simple table:
create table data (
my_value TEXT NOT NULL
);
CREATE INDEX idx_my_value ON data USING gin(my_value gin_trgm_ops);
Now I would like to essentially do group by to get a count of all the
values that are sufficiently similar. I can do it us
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Leif Jensen wrote:
>Hi guys.
>
>In the ECPG manual (including latest 9.1.9) about ECPG SQL SET CONNECTION
> ; it is stated that "This is not thread-aware".
>
>When looking in the ecpg library code connect.c for ECPGsetconn( ... ), it
> looks
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:27:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeremy Lowery writes:
> > I load and dump text files with currency values in it. The decimal in these
> > input and output formats in implied. The V format character works great for
> > outputing numeric data:
>
> > # select to_char(123.
On 05/14/2015 07:52 AM, S. Richler. wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone has successfully connected to a Progress
database using ODBC.
Yes.
See below for more information:
https://odbc.postgresql.org/
Thanks
Stuart Richler
Montreal
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Sent
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of S. Richler.
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:53 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Connection question
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone has successfully connected to a Progress data
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone has successfully connected to a Progress database
using ODBC.
Thanks
Stuart Richler
Montreal
13 matches
Mail list logo
