Hi,
I'm hitting some peculiar behaviour. I'm currently on Pg 9.1.3 on a 64bit
Debian system.
I have a database which is moderately large - 20 GByte or so - and contains
that data split up over dozens of tables, which are themselves partitioned.
Queries are usually only run against fairly small,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Yunong J Xiao wrote:
> I am currently backing up my postgres instances using ZFS snapshots
> instead of the sanctioned pg_dump utility mainly because I am running on
> Solaris and it offers a copy-on-write file system. Anecdotally this has
> been working fine for
I am currently backing up my postgres instances using ZFS snapshots instead
of the sanctioned pg_dump utility mainly because I am running on Solaris
and it offers a copy-on-write file system. Anecdotally this has been
working fine for me. Are there any issues I should be aware of since I'm
not usin
On 24 April 2012 16:17, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some 6 years ago, i had a bad experience with a custom dump. It wouldn't
> restore and my data was lost.
What was the experience? Is it possible you had specified a
compression level without the format set to custom? That would result
in a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> So my question is: what is your advice on custom dumps? Can i bet my life on
> them?
Yes, I would and I do.
I've never had a failure as you describe, going back all the way to
Postgres 6.5-ish times. Back then I did have full DB corrupti
On 04/24/2012 11:10 AM, Emi Lu wrote:
I got it and thank you very much for everyone's help!!
It seems that "left join where is null" is faster comparing with
"except". And my final query is:
select num as missing
from generate_series(5000, #{max_id}) t(num)
left join t1 on (t.num = t1.id)
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 19:51, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
>> Anyway, lesson learned, I need to either invoke pg_basebackup as the
>> same user that runs the database (or is specified with the -U
>> parameter ?), or write the backup somewhere
I got it and thank you very much for everyone's help!!
It seems that "left join where is null" is faster comparing with
"except". And my final query is:
select num as missing
from generate_series(5000, #{max_id}) t(num)
left join t1 on (t.num = t1.id)
where t1.id is null;
Emi
On 04/24/201
Hi,
I'm trying to get an idea about pg_trgrm.
I created a GIST index on a text column in a table.
Now I can filter the table with similarity().
How would I group the table so that it shows groups that have similarity
() > x ?
Lets say the table looks like this:
id, txt
1, aa1
2, bb1
3,
On 04/24/2012 07:15 AM, Emi Lu wrote:
Good morning,
May I know is there a simple sql command which could return missing
numbers please?
For example,
t1(id integer)
values= 1, 2, 3 500
select miss_num(id)
from t1 ;
Will return:
===
37, 800, 8001
T
select generate
Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some 6 years ago, i had a bad experience with a custom dump. It wouldn't
> restore and my data was lost.
> I was a beginner then, and working under windows, and i wasn't on the mailing
> list yet.
> It was no critical data, we could build the database again, which
Aha, generate_series, I got it. Thank you very much!!
I also tried left join, it seems that left join explain analyze returns
faster comparing with except:
select num as missing
from generate_series(5000, 22323) t(num)
left join t1 on (t.num = t1.id)
where t1.id is null
limit 10;
Emi
On
On 04/24/2012 07:51 PM, rihad wrote:
As PostgreSQL stores timestamps with a fractional part, does it mean that
WHERE f BETWEEN '2012-04-23 00:00:00' AND '2012'04-23 23:59:59' might
miss
records with values of f equal to 23:59:59.1234 or so?
Answering to myself: depends on how timestamp was d
Hi,
Some 6 years ago, i had a bad experience with a custom dump. It wouldn't
restore and my data was lost.
I was a beginner then, and working under windows, and i wasn't on the
mailing list yet.
It was no critical data, we could build the database again, which was then
easier than figuring out wha
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:51 AM, rihad wrote:
> As PostgreSQL stores timestamps with a fractional part, does it mean that
> WHERE f BETWEEN '2012-04-23 00:00:00' AND '2012'04-23 23:59:59' might miss
> records with values of f equal to 23:59:59.1234 or so?
I think so. I would recommend either usi
As PostgreSQL stores timestamps with a fractional part, does it mean that
WHERE f BETWEEN '2012-04-23 00:00:00' AND '2012'04-23 23:59:59' might miss
records with values of f equal to 23:59:59.1234 or so?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to you
On 24 April 2012 16:15, Emi Lu wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> May I know is there a simple sql command which could return missing numbers
> please?
>
> For example,
>
> t1(id integer)
>
> values= 1, 2, 3 500
>
> select miss_num(id)
> from t1 ;
>
>
> Will return:
> ===
> 37, 800,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:15:26AM -0400, Emi Lu wrote:
> May I know is there a simple sql command which could return missing
> numbers please?
> For example,
> t1(id integer)
> values= 1, 2, 3 500
> select miss_num(id)
> from t1 ;
select generate_series( (select min(id) from t1), (sele
Good morning,
May I know is there a simple sql command which could return missing
numbers please?
For example,
t1(id integer)
values= 1, 2, 3 500
select miss_num(id)
from t1 ;
Will return:
===
37, 800, 8001
Thanks a lot!
Emi
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
On 04/24/2012 05:12 AM, Krzysztof Nienartowicz wrote:
These types are qualified when created - the error does not happen on
creation - there are two types in two different namespaces - it
happens only on insert where it is not possible to qualify the type's
namespace.
It looks like a bug in th
Rafal Pietrak, 24.04.2012 09:02:
Hi all,
Recently I have fell onto a multicolumn update problem, earlier
discussed here:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/UPDATE-of-several-columns-using-SELECT-statement-td1916045.html
But in my case, subselect does not help, since in my case, new values
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 02:48 -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
[]
>
> Why don't create table my_table which stores the composite value by itself
> (not
> in two parts)?
Hmmm. OK. mea coulpa. I didn't follow the SQL good practice, and I don't
have a unique ID column in
> pgsql-general probably would be best. -hackers is for discussion of internals
> and development, not for usage questions.
ok, thank you.
>
> [types have namespaces]
>
>
>> Is there any way of avoid this error different than having a single
>> type defined for all schemas?
>> Any hints apprecia
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently I have fell onto a multicolumn update problem, earlier
> discussed here:
>
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/UPDATE-of-several-columns-using-SELECT-statement-td1916045.html
>
> But in my case, subselect does not h
Hi all,
Recently I have fell onto a multicolumn update problem, earlier
discussed here:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/UPDATE-of-several-columns-using-SELECT-statement-td1916045.html
But in my case, subselect does not help, since in my case, new values
for a row I get from an output of
25 matches
Mail list logo
