maybe I don't understand the problem. there is no need to clean WAL
files after recovery. where exactly is the problem ?
regards
andreas
erobles wrote:
PITR recovery
On 05/21/2010 03:04 PM, Andreas Schmitz wrote:
erobles wrote:
which is the right procedure to clean wal files after a
PITR recovery
On 05/21/2010 03:04 PM, Andreas Schmitz wrote:
erobles wrote:
which is the right procedure to clean wal files after a recovery ??
what kind of recovery ?
regards
andreas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscri
erobles wrote:
which is the right procedure to clean wal files after a recovery ??
what kind of recovery ?
regards
andreas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
erobles wrote:
which is the right procedure to clean wal files after a recovery ??
which kind of recovery ? PITR or just a crash ?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I'm thinking more along the lines of creating a bunch of temp tables, each with
one of the constraints. Then, in a loop, throw the record at each of these
temp tables and collect up the violations.
Exploring now hot to get the pieces I need from the metadata tables to do this.
-Original
"Gauthier, Dave" writes:
> Is there a way to temporarily suspend constraint checking for a particular
> constraint inside of the transaction, try the insert again, capture the next
> violation, then the next, etc... then rollback after all have been collected?
You could do something like
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Gauthier, Dave
wrote:
> Is there a way to temporarily suspend constraint checking for a particular
> constraint inside of the transaction, try the insert again, capture the next
> violation, then the next, etc... then rollback after all have been collected?
If
On 21/05/2010 14:43, christophe.an...@elsys-design.com wrote:
> How I know whether Postgres is already installed or not on a machine(on
> Linux and Windows)?
> I found that pg_ctl --version could be used or I also tried to check into
> the registry (for windows HKLM\SOFTWARE\PostgreSQL\Installatio
Is there a way to temporarily suspend constraint checking for a particular
constraint inside of the transaction, try the insert again, capture the next
violation, then the next, etc... then rollback after all have been collected?
-dave
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss
Francisco Reyes writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Francisco Reyes writes:
>>> I am trying to do
>>> select max(primary_key) from some_table;
>> Are there a whole lot of nulls in that column?
> Zero nulls. It is a primary key.
Huh. The proposed plan should have run in basically zero time then.
You
Tom Lane writes:
Francisco Reyes writes:
I am trying to do
select max(primary_key) from some_table;
Are there a whole lot of nulls in that column?
Zero nulls. It is a primary key.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
"Gauthier, Dave" writes:
> I have a table with many constraints. A user tries to insert a record that
> violates many of them. The error message I get back lists the first
> violation. How cani I (or can I) get them all?
You can't, it stops running the command at the first error.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> Hi:
>
>
>
> I have a table with many constraints. A user tries to insert a record that
> violates many of them. The error message I get back lists the first
> violation. How cani I (or can I) get them all?
the database stops processing af
In response to Gauthier, Dave :
> Hi:
>
>
>
> I have a table with many constraints. A user tries to insert a record that
> violates many of them. The error message I get back lists the first
> violation.
> How cani I (or can I) get them all?
I think that isn't possible: the first violation
Hi:
I have a table with many constraints. A user tries to insert a record that
violates many of them. The error message I get back lists the first violation.
How cani I (or can I) get them all?
I'm running 8.3.4 on linux, running through perl/DBI, getting the error message
from $dbh->errstr.
which is the right procedure to clean wal files
after a recovery ??
erobles writes:
>
[ Please don't send all-html mail to the lists ]
> I have running postgres 8.3.1 and a dump file from postgers 7.2
> :-P , but when i tried to restore the dump i have the next
> message:
> psql:lostriggers:10: NOTICE: ignoring incomplete trigger group for
> const
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Sam Mason wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:33:23PM -0500, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Richard Walker
>> wrote:
>> > If the hacker gets root access so they can read
>> > the raw database files, they most likely also
>> > have acc
hi !
I have running postgres 8.3.1 and a dump file from postgers 7.2
:-P , but when i tried to restore the dump i have the next
message:
(by the way i made the dump file using pg_dump of postgresql 8.3)
CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER "valida_ent_a_sal" AFTER DELETE ON "ent_a"
IN
What about searching your hard drive for pg_ctl.exe?
RobR
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Francisco Reyes writes:
> I am trying to do
> select max(primary_key) from some_table;
Are there a whole lot of nulls in that column?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www
Hi,
How I know whether Postgres is already installed or not on a machine(on
Linux and Windows)?
I found that pg_ctl --version could be used or I also tried to check into
the registry (for windows HKLM\SOFTWARE\PostgreSQL\Installations), however
with Windows Server 2003 pg_ctl is not recognized (pr
Postgres 8.4.1
CentOS 5.4
I am trying to do
select max(primary_key) from some_table;
The explain looks like:
explain select max(primary_key) from some_table;
QUERY PLAN
-
From:
"Thomas Kellerer"
To:
"" Dino Vliet wrote on 16.05.2010 18:07:
> Dear postgresql experts,
>
> I want to know
if postgresql has facilities for getting the first and or
> the
last in a by group.
>
> Suppose I have the following table:
>
> resnr,dep,arr,cls,dbd meaning reservationsnumber, d
Matt Bartolome writes:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So right now I'm wondering whether you're not failing to notice
>> a relevant log message(s). You've evidently managed to launch
>> the syslogger --- where is it configured to write the postmaster
>> log?
> Gosh, you k
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 16:08 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> My non-expert feeling is that you could possibly extend a predicate
> locking scheme to do this. It's something that'd maybe be possible by
> hooking into the predicate locking schemes being being designed to
> support true serializability
On 21 May 2010, at 12:44, Glyn Astill wrote:
>> So I guess your large object is too large.
>
> Hmm, we don't use any large objects though, all our data is pretty much just
> date, text and numeric fields etc
Doh! Seems I mixed up a few threads here. It was probably the mentioning of a
5GB fil
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:33:23PM -0500, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Richard Walker
> wrote:
> > If the hacker gets root access so they can read
> > the raw database files, they most likely also
> > have access to the means to decrypt any
> > encrypted data. This i
--- On Fri, 21/5/10, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 21 May 2010, at 11:58, Glyn Astill
> wrote:
>
> > Well I've ony just gotten round to taking another look
> at this, response inline below:
> >
> > --- On Fri, 30/4/10, Tom Lane
> wrote:
> >
> >> Glyn Astill
> >> writes:
> >>> The schema is fair
On 21 May 2010, at 11:58, Glyn Astill wrote:
> Well I've ony just gotten round to taking another look at this, response
> inline below:
>
> --- On Fri, 30/4/10, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Glyn Astill
>> writes:
>>> The schema is fairly large, but I will try.
>>
>> My guess is that you can reproduc
Well I've ony just gotten round to taking another look at this, response inline
below:
--- On Fri, 30/4/10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Glyn Astill
> writes:
> > The schema is fairly large, but I will try.
>
> My guess is that you can reproduce it with not a lot of
> data, if you can
> isolate the trig
On 21/05/2010 9:22 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
I'm writing in desperate hope that something like this exists... because
if so, it would make my life a lot easier. I want to be able to:
a) Roll back a transaction
b) Receive a notification when retrying the exact same transaction might
cause differen
32 matches
Mail list logo
