I'm considering using a cloud hosting solution for my website. It
will probably be either Amazon, Rackspace or Hosting.com. I'm still
comparing. Either way, my site will consist of multiple virtual
server instances that I can create and destroy as needed. Each
virtual machine instance will be s
Sorry about a error in my previous example (mixed width and precision).
But the conclusion is the same - it works on bytes:
#include
main () {
char s[] = "ni\xc3\xb1o"; /* 5 bytes , 4 utf8 chars */
printf("|%*s|\n",6,s); /* this should pad a black */
printf("|%.*s|\n",4,s);
However, it appears that glibc's printf
code interprets the parameter as the number of *characters* to print,
and to determine what's a character it assumes the string is in the
environment LC_CTYPE's encoding.
Well, I myself have problems to believe that :-)
This would be nasty... Are you sure?
hernan gonzalez writes:
> The issue is that psql tries (apparently) to convert to UTF8
> (even when he plans to output the raw text -LATIN9 in this case)
> just for computing the lenght of the field, to build the table.
> And because for this computation he (apparently) rely on the string
> routin
valentin.hoc...@kabelbw.de (Valentin Hocher) writes:
> creating conversions ... FATAL: could not load library
> "/usr/lib64/pgsql/utf8_and_shift_jis_2004.so":
> /usr/lib64/pgsql/utf8_and_shift_jis_2004.so: failed to map segment from
> shared object: Cannot allocate memory
FWIW, I tried to dupl
Mmm no: \x displays correctly for me because it sends
the raw text (in LATIN9) and I have set my terminal in LATIN9 (or ISO-8859-15)
And it's not that "xterm is misdisplaying" the text, it just that psql
is ouputting
an EMPTY (zero lenght) string for that field.
(I can even send the output to a
hernan gonzalez writes:
> But I actually dont want that. I want psql to not try any charset
> conversion, just give me the raw text as is stored in the db.
Well, that's what it's doing (given the default setting with
client_encoding equal to server_encoding), and then xterm is
misdisplaying the t
It's surely not a xterm problem, I see the characters ok with just the
\x formatting. I can check also the output redirecting to a file.
My original client_encoding seems to be LATIN9 in both cases,
accorging to the \set ouput.
If I change it (for the root user) to UTF8 with " SET CLIENT_ENCODING
hernan gonzalez writes:
> My scenario: Fedora 12, Postgresql 8.4.3 compiled from source.
> Database encoding (global) LATIN9.
> User postgres locale: LANG=en_US.iso885915,
> User root locale LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> When I connect from postgres user, all is right.
> When I connect from root, it's not
(Disclaimer: I've been using Postgresql for quite a long time, I
usually deal with non-ascii LATIN-9 characters ,
but that has never been a problem, until now)
My issue summarized: when psql is invoked from a user who has a locale
different from that of the database, the tabular output
is wrong fo
Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Ross writes:
To get the output I want above, I'd think I'd need to do a left outer join
like this:
jr...@wykids localhost# select ed_cat_name as "Level", pp_ed_cat_subject as
"Subject", pp_ed_cat_institution as "Institution" from
education_categories left outer join peo
Jeff Ross writes:
> To get the output I want above, I'd think I'd need to do a left outer join
> like this:
> jr...@wykids localhost# select ed_cat_name as "Level", pp_ed_cat_subject as
> "Subject", pp_ed_cat_institution as "Institution" from
> education_categories left outer join people_educat
On 5/7/2010 2:38 PM, Jeff Ross wrote:
This is going to be simple, I'm sure, but I'm stumped. It's a little
long but I thought as I wrote it out I'd get the aha! moment and since
that didn't happen, here goes.
snip
To get the output I want above, I'd think I'd need to do a left outer
join li
Definitely SQL*PLUS, you're right.
I managed to create a report as a UNION select between data and SUMs of data
queries, with relevant fields for GROUPing and ORDERing. I would have liked to
be able to get these "relevant fields" shown only once, so I started to check
what is available, and stu
This is going to be simple, I'm sure, but I'm stumped. It's a little long but
I thought as I wrote it out I'd get the aha! moment and since that didn't
happen, here goes.
I have a table of education categories:
jr...@wykids localhost# \d education_categories
AllieH wrote:
Yesterday I upgraded from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.4. Unfortunately this has caused
me serious problems with everything related to postgreSQL. It seems as
though the new version of ubuntu is requiring me to use PostgreSQL 8.4
instead of 8.3 which I was previously using. I tried installing
On May 7, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to write an application in C to read the list of databases
> currently in the server. very much like a "psql -l"...
>
> but I need it in C ! I never used C before to access PG.
>
> the libpq API seems a bit scary !
On 05/07/2010 01:22 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Friday 07 May 2010, AllieH wrote:
Yesterday I upgraded from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.4. Unfortunately this has
caused me serious problems with everything related to postgreSQL. It
seems as though the new version of ubuntu is requiring me to use
Post
Thanks for all the help - I needed to an initdb and then I also had to do:
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/pat/archives/postgresql-client-8.4_8.4.3-1_i386.deb
but it's finally working!! Now I just have to get all my data back but after
this headache I think that will be comparatively easy!
Thanks for a
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:18, Joao Ferreira gmail
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to write an application in C to read the list of databases
> currently in the server. very much like a "psql -l"...
select datname as database from pg_database;
> but I need it in C ! I never used C before to access
On 05/07/2010 12:10 PM, AllieH wrote:
Yesterday I upgraded from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.4. Unfortunately this has caused
me serious problems with everything related to postgreSQL. It seems as
though the new version of ubuntu is requiring me to use PostgreSQL 8.4
instead of 8.3 which I was previously u
AllieH wrote:
Yesterday I upgraded from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.4. Unfortunately this has caused
me serious problems with everything related to postgreSQL. It seems as
though the new version of ubuntu is requiring me to use PostgreSQL 8.4
instead of 8.3 which I was previously using. I tried installing
sunpeng writes:
> what's the relation between pathkey and path in optimize phase?
pathkey is a data structure representing the ordering of a path.
Have you read src/backend/optimizer/README ?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgr
valentin.hoc...@kabelbw.de (Valentin Hocher) writes:
> creating conversions ... FATAL: could not load library
> "/usr/lib64/pgsql/utf8_and_shift_jis_2004.so":
> /usr/lib64/pgsql/utf8_and_shift_jis_2004.so: failed to map segment from
> shared object: Cannot allocate memory
Hmm, there was someth
Hello all,
I need to write an application in C to read the list of databases
currently in the server. very much like a "psql -l"...
but I need it in C ! I never used C before to access PG.
the libpq API seems a bit scary ! Is there anything, shipped with
postgresql, other than libpq that would m
On Friday 07 May 2010, AllieH wrote:
> Yesterday I upgraded from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.4. Unfortunately this has
> caused me serious problems with everything related to postgreSQL. It
> seems as though the new version of ubuntu is requiring me to use
> PostgreSQL 8.4 instead of 8.3 which I was prev
when to update pg_statistic relation? is it when inserting a new tuple of
any user's relations? and the relation pg_stats at document 8.4 chapter
44.55.pg_stats hasn't been used anymore ?
another question is:
I noticed when i send the sql :"select catcode from pois goup by catcode",
the function :d
what's the relation between pathkey and path in optimize phase?
thanks
peng
Yesterday I upgraded from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.4. Unfortunately this has caused
me serious problems with everything related to postgreSQL. It seems as
though the new version of ubuntu is requiring me to use PostgreSQL 8.4
instead of 8.3 which I was previously using. I tried installing 8.4 but I
can't
Hi,
i've tried to install 8.4.3 for about two days, but i don't get it.
8.1.x has been installed before and was runnig but never used. I've removed it
with yum and wiped /var/lib/pgsl.
-=>> service postgresql initdb
Initializing database: [FAILED]
-=>> cat
Hi
IMHO, you should never store password in clear
If you store the last 5 crypted passwords, then you can make it comparing the
new password, crypted, to those 5 strings.
Regards
--
Christophe Doré
Implementation Product Manager
3 rue Marcel Allegot
92190 Meudon, France
+33
2010/5/7 Sorin Schwimmer :
> Hi All,
>
> Is there in PostgreSQL an equivalent of Oracle's BREAK/COMPUTE reporting
> feature?
No, there isn't.
You need some procedural language function, or use external tool to
accomplish this.
There are free reporting engines. jaspersoft, pentaho, BIRT, ...
[[
On Fri, 07 May 2010 10:29:20 -0400
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo writes:
> > I've been having this:
> > psql:include/custom/import_update.custom.sql:63: ERROR: deadlock
> > detected DETAIL: Process 13349 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on
> > relation 250510 of database 248569; blocked
Hi All,
Is there in PostgreSQL an equivalent of Oracle's BREAK/COMPUTE reporting
feature?
Thanks,
SxN
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Try doing a binary search with LIMIT. E.g., if you have 20M reecords,
> do a SELECT * FROM ... LIMIT 10M. (throw away the results) If that
> broke, check the upper half, if not, check the lower one (with
> OFFSET).
>
> If you have a serial p
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo writes:
> I've been having this:
> psql:include/custom/import_update.custom.sql:63: ERROR: deadlock
> detected DETAIL: Process 13349 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on
> relation 250510 of database 248569; blocked by process 14153.
> Process 14153 waits for ShareLock on trans
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 01:24, Bryan Murphy wrote:
> I'm running into this issue again:
>
> psql --version
> psql (PostgreSQL) 8.3.7
>
> COPY items_extended TO '/dev/null';
> ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 25693266 in pg_toast_25497233
>
> Unfortunately, I do not know where these ar
I checkout the pgsnmpd using command
"cvs -d pserver:anonym...@cvs.pgfoundry.org:/cvsroot/pgsnmpd checkout -r REL1_0
pgsnmpd"
Now, I want to setup the local mirror and wants to checkout the sources
from there. I use the following command:
$rsync -av cvs.pgfoundry.org:/cvsroot/pgsnmpd/* .
Passw
I've been having this:
psql:include/custom/import_update.custom.sql:63: ERROR: deadlock
detected DETAIL: Process 13349 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on
relation 250510 of database 248569; blocked by process 14153.
Process 14153 waits for ShareLock on transaction 59160779; blocked
by process 1334
39 matches
Mail list logo
