[GENERAL] 10/13 SFPUG meeting, "The Mighty GUCS," video now available

2009-10-16 Thread Christophe Pettus
The video archive for the 10/13 SFPUG meeting, "The Mighty GUCS: A guide to the essential PostgreSQL settings you need to know," is now available: http://thebuild.com/blog/2009/10/16/the-mighty-gucs/ It's also available on Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/7109722 -- -- Christophe Pet

Re: [GENERAL] Urgent Help required

2009-10-16 Thread Mike Christensen
Hmm would this be a bad time to ask for PostGres 1.0 support? On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:26 +0100, Neha Patel wrote: >> We are running with postgres sql 7.3.2. We were trying to create an >> index on a big table. The create index command ran for

Re: [GENERAL] Inheritance on foreign key

2009-10-16 Thread decibel
On Oct 12, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Erik Jones wrote: On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Takeichi Kanzaki Cabrera wrote: Hi everybody, I need your help. I have a hierarchy of tables, and other table that has a foreign key with the top table of the hierarchy, can I insert a value into the "other" table where t

Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints

2009-10-16 Thread Greg Stark
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, decibel wrote: > Out of curiosity, did you look at doing hints as comments in a query? I'm > guessing you couldn't actually do that in just a contrib module, but it's > how Oracle handles hints, and it seems to be *much* more convenient, because > a hint only appl

Re: [GENERAL] db not dumping properly, or at least not restoring

2009-10-16 Thread Kirk Wythers
On Oct 16, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Kirk Wythers wrote: Any ideas what the problem could be here? Use the pg_dump from the target (i.e. newer) pgsql. I.e. if going from 8.3.8 to 8.4.1, use the pg_dump that comes with 8.4.1 to dump the 8.

[GENERAL] pgadmin3 hangs during dump

2009-10-16 Thread Dennis Gearon
Is this the right place to post this? I set up the same characteristics on the console, and it runs fine, (COPY commands will import back, right? That's what it output.) On the console, it was: pg_dump -vaF p -f dbase.sql -U user-name dbase-name More details: about 11 tables, practically e

Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth

2009-10-16 Thread Magnus Hagander
2009/10/17 Tom Lane : > If you decide to go with this approach and use PAM as intermediary, > you'll need the patch I just committed in response to bug #5121 --- it > turns out nobody had ever tried that with Postgres before :-(.  But > I think it's also possible to just use PG's native Kerberos su

Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Scot Kreienkamp" writes: > On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote: >> ... We are a largely Windows shop with many app and >> database servers running Linux. The Linux environment is growing too >> large not to do centralized authentication of some kind. > So I guess what I see taking sha

Re: [GENERAL] db not dumping properly, or at least not restoring

2009-10-16 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Kirk Wythers wrote: > Any ideas what the problem could be here? Use the pg_dump from the target (i.e. newer) pgsql. I.e. if going from 8.3.8 to 8.4.1, use the pg_dump that comes with 8.4.1 to dump the 8.3.8 database. I usually just do it like so: (First migra

Re: [GENERAL] Partitioned tables as a poor mans columnar index?

2009-10-16 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, marcin mank wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Peter Hunsberger > wrote: > >> The basic problem I have is that I have some tables that are >> potentially very long (100,000's to millions of rows) and very skinny, > >> and I end up with maybe a total of 12 b

Re: [GENERAL] Urgent Help required

2009-10-16 Thread Jeff Davis
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:26 +0100, Neha Patel wrote: > We are running with postgres sql 7.3.2. We were trying to create an > index on a big table. The create index command ran for nearly 5 hours > at which point we decided to interrupt it. Since this was interrupted, > any operations attempted on t

Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth

2009-10-16 Thread Raymond O'Donnell
On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote: > Hey everyone, > > > > I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never > setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is, > what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG > authentication?

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints

2009-10-16 Thread Jeff Davis
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 12:04 -0500, decibel wrote: > I'm guessing you couldn't actually do that in just a contrib module, > but it's how Oracle handles hints, and it seems to be *much* more > convenient, because a hint only applies for a specific query. If that's the only reason, that seems eas

Re: [GENERAL] Partitioned tables as a poor mans columnar index?

2009-10-16 Thread marcin mank
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Peter Hunsberger wrote: > The basic problem I have is that I have some tables that are > potentially very long (100,000's to millions of rows) and very skinny, > and I end up with maybe a total of 12 bits of data in each row. Are You aware that there are some 20

Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints

2009-10-16 Thread Christophe Pettus
On Oct 16, 2009, at 10:04 AM, decibel wrote: Out of curiosity, did you look at doing hints as comments in a query? I don't think that a contrib module could change the grammar. -- -- Christophe Pettus x...@thebuild.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)

Re: [GENERAL] Inheritance on foreign key

2009-10-16 Thread decibel
On Oct 12, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Erik Jones wrote: On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Takeichi Kanzaki Cabrera wrote: Hi everybody, I need your help. I have a hierarchy of tables, and other table that has a foreign key with the top table of the hierarchy, can I insert a value into the "other" table where t

Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints

2009-10-16 Thread decibel
On Oct 6, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: this is an announcement of our new contribution module for PostgreSQL - Plantuner - enable planner hints (http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/plantuner). =# set enable_seqscan=off; =# set plantuner.forbid_index='id_idx2'; Out of curiosity, did

Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth

2009-10-16 Thread Scot Kreienkamp
On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote: > Hey everyone, > > > > I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never > setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is, > what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG > authentication?

[GENERAL] Partitioned tables as a poor mans columnar index?

2009-10-16 Thread Peter Hunsberger
I just realized that my replies to my previous question on sparse arrays went off list due to the way this list server is set up (sigh). It has occurred to me that for my problem, one possible solution is columnar indexes and that, in a way, partitioned tables in Postgres might give me somewhat t

Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth

2009-10-16 Thread Scot Kreienkamp
These are all RH4 and 5, so they do all have PAM. I thought PAM had to interface with something else, which is where NIS and LDAP enter the picture, to authenticate to another server though. Otherwise I'm not sure how it works? Thanks, Scot Kreienkamp skre...@la-z-boy.com From: Scott

Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth

2009-10-16 Thread Scott Mead
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Scot Kreienkamp wrote: > Hey everyone, > > > > I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never setup > a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is, what do > most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG authenti

[GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth

2009-10-16 Thread Scot Kreienkamp
Hey everyone, I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is, what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG authentication? From what I've read the main choices are NIS or LDAP. LDAP

Re: [GENERAL] db not dumping properly, or at least not restoring

2009-10-16 Thread Thom Brown
2009/10/16 Kirk Wythers : > I am trying to move databases to another macine (and update from 8.2 to 8.4 > along the way). I first tried pg_dumpall, but I found that one of the data > bases did not restore and data, just an empty db with no tables. Since then > I have tried pg_dump with the followin

[GENERAL] db not dumping properly, or at least not restoring

2009-10-16 Thread Kirk Wythers
I am trying to move databases to another macine (and update from 8.2 to 8.4 along the way). I first tried pg_dumpall, but I found that one of the data bases did not restore and data, just an empty db with no tables. Since then I have tried pg_dump with the following: bash-3.2$ /usr/local/pg

Re: [GENERAL] Urgent Help required

2009-10-16 Thread John R Pierce
Neha Patel wrote: Hi, We are running with postgres sql 7.3.2. We were trying to... well, right off the bat, thats a -really- old version. Release notes say February 2003. 7.3 was updated to 7.3.21, and we're currently on 8.4 (while still supporting 8.3, 8.2, 8.1, and 7.4).There

Re: [GENERAL] Urgent Help required

2009-10-16 Thread Neha Patel
Hi David, Many thanks for your reply. After good 10 hours of work we managed to restore from a backup. Regards Neha> -Original Message- From: David Fetter [mailto:da...@fetter.org] Sent: 16 October 2009 17:28 To: Neha Patel Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Urgen

Re: [GENERAL] Urgent Help required

2009-10-16 Thread David Fetter
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:26:40AM +0100, Neha Patel wrote: > Hi, > > We are running with postgres sql 7.3.2. Whatever you thought your most urgent priority was, it's actually getting your database off of a major version of PostgreSQL, 7.3, whose end-of-life was well over a year ago. Your secon

Re: [GENERAL] Urgent Help required

2009-10-16 Thread Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Neha Patel wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are running with postgres sql 7.3.2. We were trying to create an index > on a big table. The create index command ran for nearly 5 hours at which > point we decided to interrupt it. Since this was interrupted, any > operations

Re: [GENERAL] Can't find documentation for ~=~ operator

2009-10-16 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Tom Lane wrote: > Viktor Rosenfeld writes: > > I can't find the documentation of the ~=~ operator anywhere on the > > PostgreSQL homepage. > > Which version's documentation are you reading? It's gone as of 8.4. I realize that, but I have to use 8.3 right now and can't find it in that manual ei

[GENERAL] Urgent Help required

2009-10-16 Thread Neha Patel
Hi, We are running with postgres sql 7.3.2. We were trying to create an index on a big table. The create index command ran for nearly 5 hours at which point we decided to interrupt it. Since this was interrupted, any operations attempted on the table on which the index was being created gives fol

Re: [postgis-users] [GENERAL] pgsql2shp : Encoding headache

2009-10-16 Thread InterRob
I would do this last query searching for the 0xC29F character WITHOUT the upper() function on the source table, in the native (to table) UTF8 client encoding. No result either? Rob 2009/10/16 Arnaud Lesauvage > Arnaud Lesauvage a écrit : > >> But then, if I dump it through a query to have my fi

Re: [GENERAL] savepoint name vs prepared transaction name

2009-10-16 Thread Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
2009/10/16 Tom Lane > =?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= writes: > > Is there any reason, why I can't put quotes around name of savepoint, but > I > > have/can do this for prepare transaction ? > > Savepoint names are identifiers; the SQL spec says so. Prepared > transaction GIDs are string l

Re: [GENERAL] Wrong estimation of rows for hash join

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Lane
Alban Hertroys writes: > I'm also somewhat surprised to see an array of what appear to be > integers be cast to bpchar[]. Did you define those coordinates(?) as > character types? Numerical comparisons tend to be faster than string > comparisons, which should make some difference on sequenti

Re: [GENERAL] savepoint name vs prepared transaction name

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Lane
=?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= writes: > Is there any reason, why I can't put quotes around name of savepoint, but I > have/can do this for prepare transaction ? Savepoint names are identifiers; the SQL spec says so. Prepared transaction GIDs are string literals. The relevant discussion a

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql2shp : Encoding headache

2009-10-16 Thread Arnaud Lesauvage
Arnaud Lesauvage a écrit : But then, if I dump it through a query to have my field in uppercase, I get an error 'character 0xc29f of encoding UTF8 has no equivalent in WIN1252' (translated by myself, the message is in French) The command is simply : pgsql2shp -f myouput.shp -u postgres -g mygeo

Re: [GENERAL] Wrong estimation of rows for hash join

2009-10-16 Thread Alban Hertroys
On 16 Oct 2009, at 10:59, Christian Schröder wrote: Hi list, I have the following query: SELECT * FROM base INNER JOIN pt USING (x) WHERE pt.y IN ('1121', '11411', '11421', '1161', '1162'); "explain analyze" yields the following result:

[GENERAL] savepoint name vs prepared transaction name

2009-10-16 Thread Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Is there any reason, why I can't put quotes around name of savepoint, but I have/can do this for prepare transaction ? Ie: SAVEPOINT 'foo'; --- doesn't work SAVEPOINT foo; --- all grand PREPARE TRANSACTION 'foo'; --- grand PREPARE TRANSACTION foo; refuses to work. It is quite confusing, I feel l

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql2shp : Encoding headache

2009-10-16 Thread Arnaud Lesauvage
Raymond O'Donnell a écrit : If it's any help to you, you can get iconv (and a bunch of other helpful stuff) from GnuWin32: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ Thanks for your help Raymond. I tried iconv but I have other problems now. I still have to load the file into postgresql because the sh

Re: [GENERAL] [postgis-users] pgsql2shp : Encoding headache

2009-10-16 Thread InterRob
Does that last query (invoking the upper() function) actually run well when executed in pgsql console? Rob 2009/10/16 Arnaud Lesauvage > Hi all! > > I have an UTF8 encoded shapefile, and an UTF8 encoded postgis-enabled > database. I want my shapefile to be encoded in WIN1252, and a particular >

Re: [GENERAL] pgsql2shp : Encoding headache

2009-10-16 Thread Raymond O'Donnell
On 16/10/2009 10:36, Arnaud Lesauvage wrote: > I have an UTF8 encoded shapefile, and an UTF8 encoded postgis-enabled > database. I want my shapefile to be encoded in WIN1252, and a particular > field to be in uppercase. > > Since I am on windows, I don't have an iconv executable. Therefore, I am

[GENERAL] pgsql2shp : Encoding headache

2009-10-16 Thread Arnaud Lesauvage
Hi all! I have an UTF8 encoded shapefile, and an UTF8 encoded postgis-enabled database. I want my shapefile to be encoded in WIN1252, and a particular field to be in uppercase. Since I am on windows, I don't have an iconv executable. Therefore, I am trying to : - dump the shapefile with shp

[GENERAL] Wrong estimation of rows for hash join

2009-10-16 Thread Christian Schröder
Hi list, I have the following query: SELECT * FROM base INNER JOIN pt USING (x) WHERE pt.y IN ('1121', '11411', '11421', '1161', '1162'); "explain analyze" yields the following result: QUERY PLAN -