El jue, 09-08-2007 a las 14:51 +, John Coulthard escribió:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to set up a new webserver running php and pgsql. PHP was
> connecting to postgres but I needed to install the php-gd module and now I
> get the error...
>
> "PHP Warning: pg_connect() [ href='function.pg-connec
On 8/10/07, .ep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm moving from the mysql camp and quite liking things like functions
> and such, but a lot of my functionality depends on queries such as
>
>SELECT id, name, start_date
>FROM customer
>WHERE name LIKE 'eri%';
>
> These kinds of queri
Hi,
I'm moving from the mysql camp and quite liking things like functions
and such, but a lot of my functionality depends on queries such as
SELECT id, name, start_date
FROM customer
WHERE name LIKE 'eri%';
These kinds of queries are super fast in MySQL because "eri%" type
conditions al
> AFAICS, all you need to do is swap the ordering of those two operations.
>
> It might help to understand that what you write as an INSERT/VALUES is
> really more like INSERT ... SELECT ... FROM myview WHERE ..., the WHERE
> condition being the same as was given in the "UPDATE myview" command
> t
"Peter Marius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought, the example with "mylog" would be better to
> demonstrate the problem, but it's missing the point.
> Below, if have added the code with my real problem.
> CREATE RULE sru AS ON UPDATE TO myview DO INSTEAD
> (
> UPDATE mytable SET stop = now
Karsten Hilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>> So if I understand correctly, a timestamp_tz is ...
> ... stored as UTC in the backend
> ... sent to clients shifted by whatever timezone was
> requested by the client by o
On 8/10/07, Raymond O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/08/2007 21:29, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>
> > select table1.id from table1 where table1.id is not in (select id from
> > table2);
>
> Duh! I should have thought of that thanks for that, and apologies
> for the stupidity (blame it o
On 10/08/2007 21:29, Scott Marlowe wrote:
select table1.id from table1 where table1.id is not in (select id from table2);
Duh! I should have thought of that thanks for that, and apologies
for the stupidity (blame it on the glass of wine I had with dinner!).
Ray.
--
On 8/10/07, Raymond O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - how can I find those people who don't have _all_ of the items which
> are marked "required"?
>
> In other words, how do I select those rows in "people" which don't have
> a corresponding row in "items_for_people" for *each* row in "items"
Hi all,
Given the following tables -
create table people (
person_id text primary key,
person_name text,
[...etc...]
);
create table items (
item_id text primary key,
item_name text,
is_required boolean,
[...etc...]
);
create table items_for_people (
p
On 8/10/07, Mary Ellen Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Merlin,
>
> I am willing to spend the time, as it is an important table. I am a
> newbie at this and it has fallen into my lap.
> From what the user tells me, it is only the one table.
> Not sure if fsync was running, how can I tell?
Hi Tom,
thanks for your answer, I have also thought of combining
the statements, but my SQL-knowledge is too small for that.
I thought, the example with "mylog" would be better to
demonstrate the problem, but it's missing the point.
Below, if have added the code with my real problem.
What I want
On 8/10/07, Mary Ellen Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are running postgresql-7.3.3 and we had a hardware controller and
> disk failure on the system. And of course the database does not appear
> to be backup anywhere.
>
> I was reading about PITR and was wondering if that is a
On 10/08/2007 19:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Use the "verbose" option.
[/me tries it out]
That'll do nicely - thanks.
Ray.
---
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Raymond O'Donnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, it *would* be really handy if pg_dump included a timestamp in
> the plain-text output.
Use the "verbose" option.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4:
Hi,
We are running postgresql-7.3.3 and we had a hardware controller and
disk failure on the system. And of course the database does not appear
to be backup anywhere.
I was reading about PITR and was wondering if that is applicable to my
version. We do have pg_xlog files and I am wondering
> It seems to me that the real solution is for me to stop using the database as
> an IPC system to pass somewhat time-critical data between processes. Given
> the time constraints I'm working under this unfortunately was the quickest
> route.
At least for the first 5 minutes. :) I was wonderin
On 10/08/2007 18:40, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
If you need to, you can append your own timestamp to the dump file if you need
it.
Heh heh, I just gave this same advice in reply to the post that prompted
this idea. :-)
Thanks,
Ray.
--- Raymond O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/08/2007 23:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > My database is restored from a dump file every day. How I know that this
> > database is up to date (as it has no timestamp in any table).
> >
> > If I create a file, I can know when I created
Hello.
I have a number of deadlock because of the foreign key constraint:
Assume we have 2 tables: A and B. Table A has a field fk referenced to
B.idas a foreign key constraint.
-- transaction #1
BEGIN;
...
INSERT INTO A(x, y, fk) VALUES (1, 2, 666);
...
END;
-- transaction #2
BEGIN;
UPDATE B
Ok, partial day results. Looks like my changes have not solved the problem,
just spread it out a little more (as would be expected based on your
responses). The delays are now shorter (about half) but occur more frequently
(maybe 1x / minute). The params I used are:
bgwriter_lru_percent = 5.
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 10:02 -0400, Brad Nicholson wrote:
> I just want to confirm that the cluster/MVCC issues are due to
> transaction visibility. Assuming that no concurrent access is happening
> to a given table when the cluster command is issued (when takes it
> visibility snapshot), it is saf
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Nathan Wilhelmi wrote:
are the out of the box configs pretty good or are there any recommended
changes I should be making to start with?
The out of the box configuration is wildly inappropriate for your system,
and there are few examples of something appropriate to point
On 09/08/2007 23:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My database is restored from a dump file every day. How I know that this
database is up to date (as it has no timestamp in any table).
If I create a file, I can know when I created it by seeing its property.
How I can do the same thing with a back u
On 09/08/2007 23:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My database is restored from a dump file every day. How I know that this
database is up to date (as it has no timestamp in any table).
If I create a file, I can know when I created it by seeing its property.
How I can do the same thing with a back u
"Peter Marius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I created a view on all entries with stop=null.
> The DB-Interaction should be done over the view,
> so I added rules for INSERT, UPDATE an DELETE.
> Insert and Update work fine, but the DELETE_RULE
> stopps after the first UPDATE statement in the Rule
The out-of-the-box configs are pretty awful for you. Read some
list archives (from this list and pgsql-performance) and also take a look
at http://www.powerpostgresql.com/Downloads/annotated_conf_80.html
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Nathan Wilhelmi wrote:
Hello - Just installed 8.2.4 on a Solaris 9 b
Hi all,
I have a table "mytable" to log the validity of
data records with start and stop time.
To see, which records are still valid,
I created a view on all entries with stop=null.
The DB-Interaction should be done over the view,
so I added rules for INSERT, UPDATE an DELETE.
Insert and Update
Hello - Just installed 8.2.4 on a Solaris 9 box. It's an 8-way (15000
MHz sparc) with 32GB of ram. We don't know the exact table structure yet
or access patterns, although the first thing that will be looked at is a
Sesame triple store DB. I would expect that this DB will be more skewed
to read
On 8/10/07, carter ck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing a performance issue here. Whenever I do a count(*) on a table
> that contains about 300K records, it takes few minutes to complete. Whereas
> my other application which is counting > 500K records just take less than 10
> sec
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Marc Rossi wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. The box in question is a dual cpu (xeon dual
cores) with 8 gig & a pair of 10k 146gb raid 1 arrays. I have the
pg_xlog dir on one array (along with the OS) & the rest of the data on
the other array by itself.
Yeah, that's kind
On 10.08.2007, at 06:58, .ep wrote:
Hi, what if I need to do a count with a WHERE condition? E.g.,
SELECT count(*) from customers where cust_id = 'georgebush' and
created_on > current_date - interval '1 week' ;
Can I get the info about this from somewhere in the pg system tables
as well? Queri
On Aug 10, 2007, at 5:56 , Alejandro Torras wrote:
Is there some way to put values in a INSERT statement
without taking care of apostrophes?
In example:
INSERT INTO persons VALUES ('Harry', 'O'Callaghan');
This is pretty much a solved problem: don't interpolate into SQL
statements. Use bin
I just want to confirm that the cluster/MVCC issues are due to
transaction visibility. Assuming that no concurrent access is happening
to a given table when the cluster command is issued (when takes it
visibility snapshot), it is safe to cluster that table. Correct?
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-41
In response to ".ep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Aug 10, 9:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("A.
> Kretschmer") wrote:
> > am Fri, dem 10.08.2007, um 17:46:11 +0800 mailte carter ck folgendes:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> >
> > > I am facing a performance issue here. Whenever I do a count(*) on a table
> > > that c
On Aug 10, 9:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("A.
Kretschmer") wrote:
> am Fri, dem 10.08.2007, um 17:46:11 +0800 mailte carter ck folgendes:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I am facing a performance issue here. Whenever I do a count(*) on a table
> > that contains about 300K records, it takes few minutes to complet
Greg -
Thanks for the heads up. The box in question is a dual cpu (xeon dual cores)
with 8 gig & a pair of 10k 146gb raid 1 arrays. I have the pg_xlog dir on one
array (along with the OS) & the rest of the data on the other array by itself.
Given that this is a production system I'm going to
am Fri, dem 10.08.2007, um 17:46:11 +0800 mailte carter ck folgendes:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing a performance issue here. Whenever I do a count(*) on a table
> that contains about 300K records, it takes few minutes to complete. Whereas
> my other application which is counting > 500K records jus
-- English --
Hi,
Is there some way to put values in a INSERT statement
without taking care of apostrophes?
In example:
INSERT INTO persons VALUES ('Harry', 'O'Callaghan');
^^^
I think that it can be used some kind of length-marker
to help the parsin
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> So if I understand correctly, a timestamp_tz is ...
... stored as UTC in the backend
... sent to clients shifted by whatever timezone was
requested by the client by one of several mechanisms:
- "set timezone t
Hi all,
I am facing a performance issue here. Whenever I do a count(*) on a table
that contains about 300K records, it takes few minutes to complete. Whereas
my other application which is counting > 500K records just take less than 10
seconds to complete.
I have indexed all the essential col
Doh! It was the Vista firewall. I've got a couple of other services running on
that machine and they worked. That's why I assumed that it wasn't a FW problem
(using Vistas internal).But it was thanks.> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:06:19
-0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC:
pgs
Hello,
the following is a rework of what I wanted to achieve when posting
yesterday. Since that post didn't seem to attract attention, I tried
to do what I wanted to do differently.
Now, creating a RULE for a view allows defining several operations for
it. I was happy to discover that actually a
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:49:38AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On 8/9/07, Louis-David Mitterrand
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After our 7.4 to 8.2 upgrade using debian tools, we realized that some
> > of our timestamps with tz had shifted:
> >
> > For example '2007-04-01 00:00:00+
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:44:29PM -0300, Ranieri Mazili wrote:
> 1) Can I use a function that will return a string in a where clause like
> bellow?
> 2) Can I use a function that will return a string to return the list of
> columns that I want to show like below?
not in sql. you can in pl/pgsql
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Marc Rossi wrote:
as well as made changes to the bgwriter settings as shown below (taken
from a post in the pgsql-performance list)
bgwriter_lru_percent = 20.0 # 0-100% of LRU buffers scanned/round
bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 200 # 0-1000 buffers max writ
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 19:32 +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 15:57 -0700, Steve Wampler wrote:
> > I need the Java and Python interfaces supplied with
> > (from 8.1.9):
> >
> >postgresql-jdbc-8.1.4-1.centos.1
> >postgresql-python-8.1.9-1.el4s1.1
>
> The actual
47 matches
Mail list logo
