Steve Atkins wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Madison Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
I am reading through some docs on switching to Postfix with a SQL
backend. The docs use MySQL but I want to use PgSQL so I am trying to
adapt as I go. I am stuck though; can anyone help give me the PgSQL
equiv.
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I however noticed that pg_dump also does this:
> ALTER TABLE public.mytable OWNER TO pgsql;
> Shouldn't the "public." be left out?
Probably in an ideal world, but that code is far from ideal --- it's
dealing with a bunch of considerations including co
On Jul 13, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Madison Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
I am reading through some docs on switching to Postfix with a SQL
backend. The docs use MySQL but I want to use PgSQL so I am trying
to adapt as I go. I am stuck though; can anyone help give me the
PgSQL equiv. of:
SELECT CONC
Madison Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
I am reading through some docs on switching to Postfix with a SQL
backend. The docs use MySQL but I want to use PgSQL so I am trying to
adapt as I go. I am stuck though; can anyone help give me the PgSQL
equiv. of:
SELECT
CONCAT(SUBSTRING_INDEX(usr_email,'@',
Hi all,
I am reading through some docs on switching to Postfix with a SQL
backend. The docs use MySQL but I want to use PgSQL so I am trying to
adapt as I go. I am stuck though; can anyone help give me the PgSQL
equiv. of:
SELECT
CONCAT(SUBSTRING_INDEX(usr_email,'@',-1),'/',SUBSTRING_INDE
On Jul 13, 2007, at 19:10 , Francisco Reyes wrote:
Alternatively is there any easy way to take all data in one schema
and load it into a target DB and a different schema?
You might try using the -n flag with pg_dump, replace schema1 with
schema2 in the dump file, and loading the altered du
On Jul 13, 2007, at 2:11 PM, A. Kretschmer wrote:
am Fri, dem 13.07.2007, um 18:50:26 +0200 mailte Zlatko Mati?
folgendes:
When using multirow INSERT INTO...VALUES command, are all rows
inserted in a
batch, or row by row?
Within one transaction, yes.
Trust me... It's MUCH faster then
pg_dump by default puts at the top
SET search_path = public,pg_catalog;
This considering a plain vanilla setup where no schemas other than public
have been created.
I however noticed that pg_dump also does this:
ALTER TABLE public.mytable OWNER TO pgsql;
Shouldn't the "public." be left out?
On Jul 13, 2007, at 2:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried to restore a dump from version 8.1.8 to 8.1.9 and i had in
one table
a value "1.7383389519587511e-310"
i got the following error message:
pg_restore: ERROR: type "double precision" value out of range:
underflow
CONTEXT: COPY g
Hi
i tried to restore a dump from version 8.1.8 to 8.1.9 and i had in one table
a value "1.7383389519587511e-310"
i got the following error message:
pg_restore: ERROR: type "double precision" value out of range: underflow
CONTEXT: COPY gesamtpunktecache, line 925001, column
gc_gesamtsiege: "
am Fri, dem 13.07.2007, um 18:50:26 +0200 mailte Zlatko Mati? folgendes:
> When using multirow INSERT INTO...VALUES command, are all rows inserted in a
> batch, or row by row?
Within one transaction, yes.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -
When using multirow INSERT INTO...VALUES command, are all rows inserted in a
batch, or row by row?
Regards,
Zlatko
On Jul 10, 2007, at 2:38 PM, orehon wrote:
Hello,
if I have this table:
CREATE TABLE teste (
id integer,
picos real[],
);
and insert this values:
INSERT INTO teste VALUES(1, '{{1,2,3},{1,2,3},{1,2,3},{1,2,3},
{1,2,3}}');
INSERT INTO teste VALUES(2, '{{1,2,3},{1,2,3},{1,2,3},{1,2,3},{1,2,
On Jul 10, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Benoit Mathieu wrote:
I want to use postgres to store data and large files, typically
audio files from 100ko to 20Mo. For those files, I just need to
store et retrieve them, in an ACID way. (I don't need search, or
substring, or others functionnalities)
I saw pos
On Jul 10, 2007, at 4:08 AM, lim siang min wrote:
I'm new to Postgresql and need to support on any IT related problem.
One of my customer not able to start the postgresql services.
The log said that ..
record with zero length at 0/2E16910
invalid primary checkpoint record
record with zero length
On Jul 9, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Postgres User wrote:
materialized view - view_a
child tables - table_a, table_b, table_c
Here's my question- what's the fastest what to retrieve rows from each
of the child tables after I get results from view_a ?
I don't like using temp tables in Postgres (
On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Gustavo Ces wrote:
Hi all,
I´ve got a strange problem, hope you could help. I´ve got a
table (a ) with n tuples, and two fields , birthplace and birth
date. There´s another table ( say b) with m tuples, where i´ve got
a lot of polygons ( with their code, sam
turbovince escribió:
> Hello, I would like to perform some accent-insensitive searches on my
> database, which means that a select query with condition, say, WHERE
> NAME = 'HELLÔ' would return records where name is 'HELLO' as well.
>
> My data is encoded in Unicode (UTF8) and therefore I cannot u
On Jul 4, 2007, at 5:22 AM, Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote:
We have 2 altogether databases owned by two different users.The
requirement is ,by using a back up dump of a database owned by some
other user,We will need to restore the other DB which is owned
completely by other user.
The problem
On 7/12/07, imageguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there pre-existing tools out there that does this sort of thing ??
Rails and Django -- two popular web development frameworks -- support
a simple mechanism for doing schema migrations.
In Rails, in particular, each schema change is encapsulat
On Jul 12, 4:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Crawford)
wrote:
> imageguy wrote:
> > I am building an application with Postrges as the backend foundation.
> > This is my first application and it has struck me that as we add
> > features/functionality to the application and database with each new
> >
tabai wrote:
> Hi
>
> I know that i can limited the total number of connections in
> postgresql.conf with max_connections, but... can i limite the max
> number of connections from an specific IP?
>
> For example y like have total max connections of 40 buy the same ip
> can't have more than 5 con
Nik wrote:
> PostgreSQL 8.2 on Windows 2003 Server.
>
> Is it possible to limit number of connections per username?
yes - look for CONNECTION LIMIT on:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-createrole.html
and
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-alterrole.html
Stefan
---
On Friday 13 July 2007 05:21, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Robert Treat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm guessing the lack of response is due to a lack of knowledge on the
> > topic. Personally I've never quite understood how you'd make use of the
> > sslinfo functions to manage connections without
angga erwina wrote:
hi all, anybody can you tell me how to measure
performance slony to replicate?? where site is i can
get reference for this topik??
What "performance" are you trying to measure?
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---(end of broadcast)
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 11:19 -0700, Benjamin Arai wrote:
> I am running the latest 8.2.4. I am using GIN. The data is static. I do
> a batch upload every week of about 500GB and the ata is never touched
> again, it is always add and never delete or update.
Partitioning will certainly help the i
hi all, anybody can you tell me how to measure
performance slony to replicate?? where site is i can
get reference for this topik??
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.
"Robert Treat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm guessing the lack of response is due to a lack of knowledge on the topic.
> Personally I've never quite understood how you'd make use of the sslinfo
> functions to manage connections without something like on commit triggers, so
> I hope you'll c
"Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> What is efficient approach toward storing a web application's user
> data.
I would recommend one large DB with large tables.
You might consider using partitioning to actually store the data separately.
But even then I would not consider it until it wa
Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
Here's another easy (stupid?) question:
SELECT data.* FROM (SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY bar) AS data
Will the returned rows still be ordered by bar?
In practice, for this precise query, yes.
However, embedding this into a larger query or adding a WHERE clause
could
Here's another easy (stupid?) question:
SELECT data.* FROM (SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY bar) AS data
Will the returned rows still be ordered by bar?
--
Make April 15 just another day, visit http://fairtax.org
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don'
The parsing has turned out to be pretty intense. It takes about 10-20
minutes for any project. When we are parsing data, it really slows
down the site's response. I tested serving static webpages from
apache, endless loops in php , but the choke point seems to be doing
any other query on postgr
Zlatko Matić wrote:
Hello, Tom.
I don't understand relation between constraints and indexes.
By using EMS PostgreSQL Manager Lite, I created indexes on columns, some
of them are unique values.
But when I open it in PgAdmin, all such "unique" indexes are listed as
constraints and there are no i
33 matches
Mail list logo
