Jim Nasby wrote:
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
As the owner of a 1986 Toyota Celica, I can accept the argument that a
newer car with slightly brighter paint might not be worth the switch.
Yup... that's why I drive a 1991 Acura.
Of course, there's also the fact that the NS
Added to TODO:
* Allow BEFORE INSERT triggers on views
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-02/msg01466.php
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Karl O. Pinc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here's the problem: when configure tries to compile the code snippet to
> > check for com_err, it needs to do this with -lcrypto added, but it's not
> > using that. What's the "right" way to fix this? I could probably get it to
> >
On Mar 10, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Erik Jones wrote:
I've seen that I can get the total number of blocks read from disk
over the lifetime of a database via the pg_stat_database view, and
by taking successive readings I can track reads over time. How can
I track disk writes?
Hey Erik...
That's
Dropping -hackers
On Mar 22, 2007, at 4:23 AM, Saqib Awan wrote:
is there an existing mechanism to do user based connection controls in
Postgres 7.4?
Other than max_connections?
--
Jim Nasby[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
Have you timed it both with and without the separate btree? It could
be that using the 2 indexes is actually faster.
On Mar 10, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Arnaud Lesauvage wrote:
Hi list !
I have a quite large table with a PostGIS-geometry field (~25M
rows) representing road segments.
The segments
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
As the owner of a 1986 Toyota Celica, I can accept the argument that a
newer car with slightly brighter paint might not be worth the switch.
Yup... that's why I drive a 1991 Acura.
Of course, there's also the fact that the NSX will do 180MPH..
Am 24.03.2007 um 19:08 schrieb Tom Lane:
Sebastian Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
the functions function_in and function_out should be called
automatically on select or insert / update.
How can I change the table definition to use function_in and
function_out transparently for me (as if the
Sebastian Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the functions function_in and function_out should be called
> automatically on select or insert / update.
> How can I change the table definition to use function_in and
> function_out transparently for me (as if the table had a text colum)
You woul
Hi,
currently I do this:
INSERT INTO table1 (row1) VALUES ( function_in('argument1','myvalue'))
and
select function_out('argument1',row1) from table1; (which gives
'myvalue' again)
funtion_out(text,int) returns text
funtion_in(text,text) returns int
the table looks like this:
create table
Naz Gassiep escribió:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >This line of argument ignores the fact that newer versions often contain
> >fixes for data-loss-grade bugs. Now admittedly that is usually an
> >argument for updating to x.y.z+1 rather than x.y+1, but I think it
> >destroys any reasoning on the basis of
On 24/03/2007 03:24, Stephen Liu wrote:
The advantage of running thumb drive is convenient to carry. Its
disadvantage is having life-time. I don't know how big will be your
Not to mention the danger of losing the confounded thing :) . I've
had a scare or two in the past with these devic
12 matches
Mail list logo
