Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 22:59 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
> > > > Sure, see the psql manual page, but setting EDITOR is the easiest way.
> > > > This works on Win32 too.
> > >
> > > c:\set EDITOR="c:\Program Files\Vim\vim70\gvim.exe"
> > >
>
OK, so we have a bug. Thanks.
---
Chad Wagner wrote:
> On 2/3/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Would someone please confirm that our behavior in the three queries
> > below matches Oracle's behavior?
On 2/3/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would someone please confirm that our behavior in the three queries
below matches Oracle's behavior?
Here is output from Oracle:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OL
Would someone please confirm that our behavior in the three queries
below matches Oracle's behavior?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Belinda M. Giardine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Should it be this way?
>
> Well, to_timestamp(
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:32:04PM -0800, Karen Hill wrote:
> Is it possible to have a pl/pgsql function take another pl/pgsql
> function as one of the parameters?
>
> regards,
> karen
>
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0,
Documentation patch attached and applied to HEAD and 8.2.X.
---
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>
>
> --On onsdag, december 13, 2006 11.04.54 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
Is there any fedora mailinglist? Never knew if there was one
try here:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Sent: 03/02/07, 10:58:08
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Query optimization problem
>
> >>> Try SELECT count(*) FROM ... instead and see if the times are closer.
> >
> >> Correct. That executes in
> I would be careful about using dspam.
>
> I have documented cases where it lost email and even with posting all
> the debug and other logs on the mailing lists I've never received any
> indication that they recognize this as a dspam problem.
>
> dspam will lose your mail.
*ahem* I have severa
Hi!
Just to let you know that I've just tried to access Varlena.com again and it
worked. I'm just reporting it here because of the "noise" I caused when I
asked if there was any blocking. :-)
Thanks for whoever solved that!
Be seeing you,
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
lol
On 2/3/07, Andreas Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harpreet Dhaliwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Is there any fedora mailinglist? Never knew if there was one
Yes, more then one, ask google.
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
uni
Harpreet Dhaliwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Is there any fedora mailinglist? Never knew if there was one
Yes, more then one, ask google.
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torv
Is there any fedora mailinglist? Never knew if there was one
On 2/3/07, A. Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
am Sat, dem 03.02.2007, um 9:49:46 -0500 mailte Harpreet Dhaliwal
folgendes:
> Also, wanted to know how to prevent remote root ftp login in fedora.
1. configure your ftp-server a
am Sat, dem 03.02.2007, um 9:49:46 -0500 mailte Harpreet Dhaliwal folgendes:
> Also, wanted to know how to prevent remote root ftp login in fedora.
1. configure your ftp-server appropriate
2. this is a postgresql-mailinglist, not fedore or such
3. i don't like silly fullquote below the answer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/07 07:17, Tom Allison wrote:
> Alban Hertroys wrote:
>> Jean-Gérard Pailloncy wrote:
[snip]
> The *one* feature I did like about dspam is they quarantine spam and you
> can sort it out later. That can be done easily enough and won't
> interfe
Also, wanted to know how to prevent remote root ftp login in fedora.
On 2/3/07, Andreas Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harpreet Dhaliwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi,
> though this is not directly related to postgres, but i was wondering why
are
> most of the ports seen closed
> wh
From: "Tomi N/A"
And the .bat file script?
The .bat script is of no importance:
So be it...
it's a windows-related problem
Is the Task Scheduler service running? (Start > Settings > Control Panel >
Administrative Tools > Services - Task Scheduler?).
If the Task Scheduler service is r
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Jean-Gérard Pailloncy wrote:
I do not have test numbers rigth now, because I need first to configure
the box for virtual hosting, then dspam.
It would be really wonderful if someone managed to combine this with
dspams own database. Maybe it'd be possible to pull dspam's a
PostGreSQL (7.4 and onward) has such a thing build-in, but its not
particulary good (simple case works, but once it gets complex it makes a
mess out of it).
For example the postgresql formatted version
$CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW "Subquery" AS
$ SELECT t1.a, t2.b
$ FROM ( SELECT 1 AS a, 2 AS x) t1
Hi,
I got stuck with the following problem and strangely couldn't find
anything similar in the list:
Assume two tables:
table: warehouse, columns: id, incoming, outgoing
table: articles, columns: id, articles_in_stock
All I want is to create a rule, that everytime when articles leave or
get in
Try SELECT count(*) FROM ... instead and see if the times are closer.
Correct. That executes in 300ms flat:
So your problem is data transfer, not the query per se.
Well, based on PgAdmin times I suspected some sort of heavy 'data
preparation before it's sent out' overhead
How old a pgAdm
Harpreet Dhaliwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi,
> though this is not directly related to postgres, but i was wondering why are
> most of the ports seen closed
> when one does nmap scan of these ports. Whats reason can we attribute to the
> fact that most of the ports in an OS are
> in closed
Hi,
though this is not directly related to postgres, but i was wondering why are
most of the ports seen closed
when one does nmap scan of these ports. Whats reason can we attribute to the
fact that most of the ports in an OS are
in closed state.
Thanks,
Harpreet
23 matches
Mail list logo
