[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This may sound a bit weird, but have you tried logging in as user1 and
then granting the permission's to the superuser?
Found that superuser could not see them because I had the tables in two
schemas which the superuser did not have path to.
Doing \dt .* I was able
Tom Lane writes:
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have one database owned by "user1" which as of 4 days ago the superuser,
pgsql, can't see any tables.
After furhter researching found that I could not see the tables because I
have them in diferent schemas.. and the superuser di
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have one database owned by "user1" which as of 4 days ago the superuser,
> pgsql, can't see any tables.
Transaction ID wraparound ... I take it this is not PG 8.1?
As long as it's at least 7.4, vacuuming the system catalogs should help.
I have one database owned by "user1" which as of 4 days ago the superuser,
pgsql, can't see any tables.
I noticed I had pg_dumpalls from 4 days ago.. stuck.. upon research I
discovered that if I login as the superuser to the problem database that it
can not see any of the tables owned by the r
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 10:05, Enrico Riedel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I moved all of our PostGRE DBs from Windows to Linux last weekend.
> Everything went well, performance is great, BUT there is one issue that I
> need to solve.
>
> My problem is, that the precision for timestamps in Linux is greater than
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:05:14 -0500
Enrico Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem is, that the precision for timestamps in Linux is
> greater than in Windows. That seems to be fine, but MS Access
> cannot handle it. E.g.:
>
>Windows Timestamp: 2006-09-08 15:25:42.332
>Linux Timesta
Hello Again,
Yes, you're right. What I am talking about is a material view. Since
I'm not sure yet which would be best (Material View Vs. Normal View) I
will first try a normal view and if it turns out to be too slow I can
always switch to a Material View.
Thanks!
---(en
Thanks Alvaro!
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
Hi.
We are looking to open a small web shop. I looked around to see if there are
any open source web shops.
Can anyone recommend any web shop system (free or non-free)?
thanks
stig
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archive
Hi!
I moved all of our PostGRE DBs from Windows to Linux last weekend.
Everything went well, performance is great, BUT there is one issue that I
need to solve.
My problem is, that the precision for timestamps in Linux is greater than in
Windows. That seems to be fine, but MS Access cannot handle
> You can eliminate such things by checking
> the Subject line for Re: AW: SV: and such.
>
> :0
> * ! ^Subject:.*Re:
> * ^Subject:.*(subscribe|subscribel|suscribe)
> /dev/null
... which still doesn't cover "RE" translated in most of the world's
languages, which I'm sure occasionally pop up from p
Excellent, I managed to find one of the major sticking points all by
myself! This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!
There seems to be a lot of that in the DB world. Practical vs
theoretical. Or pragmatic vs strict. It seems to be whether you came
from a math background -- in which ca
On 9/11/06, Brandon Aiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My question relates to primary keys. The vast majority of tables have a
primary key on a single char or varchar field. Is it considered better
practice to create a serial type id key to use as the primary key for the
table, and then create a
Since you're in the process of modifying a database, you could find this useful:
Agile Databases Techniques, by Scott Ambler.
Regards
Marco
On 9/11/06, Brandon Aiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been tasked with the unenviable job or migrating a MySQL 4.0 database
to something more us
I’ve been tasked with the unenviable job or migrating
a MySQL 4.0 database to something more usable (namely, PostgreSQL 8). MySQL
4.0 doesn’t even support basic things like subqueries, and in order to
emulate the effects that RULEs, TRIGGERs and VIEWs bring, they had been using
PHP scripts
Suppose I have two
groups of users and want to keep some sensitive information "hidden" from one
group as described in the simple example below.
When connecting as
user 'visitor' via pgAdmin I am surprised that I can easily browse the structure
of tables and the code of functions owned by 't
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:36:28 -0400
John DeSoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No matter how many $$ I put in my sql code it won't work in 7.4 ;)
And I bet (ooh not seriously, since it's not the most proficient way to invest
my $$) pgsql 8.X has been backported in sarge and it should already be in etch
On 9/11/06, Purusothaman A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Marco Bizzarri and Martijn van Oosterhout,
Thanks for your valuable reply.
I am trying to execute all query from VC++ through
CDatabase::ExecuteSQL(sQueryString) function call.
ie, via programming, not by manual entering query statement
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:44:18AM +0200, Jean-Gerard Pailloncy wrote:
> Le 11 sept. 06 à 05:57, Michael Fuhr a écrit :
> > If such a capability existed then it could arguably be considered
> > a flaw in SSL because it would allow a server to impersonate one
> > of its clients to another server or
On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
Since the code inside the function is getting a bit longer than
what I was used I'm getting crazy about double quotes, syntax
highlight and such.
I'm using pg 7.4 so $$ trick shouldn't work.
If you can't update to 8.0 or later, you
Hi Marco Bizzarri and Martijn van Oosterhout,Thanks for your valuable reply.I am trying to execute all query from VC++ through CDatabase::ExecuteSQL(sQueryString) function call.ie, via programming, not by manual entering query statements.
so, in my situation I can construct a string and pass on to
> I'm using pg 7.4 so $$ trick shouldn't work.
Should work. if you put enugh $$, somebody might backport this for you ;)
how about:
create or replace function SP_GarbageCollectionGenerate()
returns bool as '
declare
v_query text;
begin
v_qyery=''create or replace blah blah
:para1 blah b
> == PostgreSQL Product News ==
>
> pgpool-II-1.0.0 is out, now supporting more than two servers and with
> the new pgpoolAdmin tool written in PHP.
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/
You dropped the most important feature in pgpool-II: parallel query.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
--
On 9/11/06, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd write a trigger that generate a function.
This is done for performance reasons.
The function will be called several times and it is a list of delete statement
according to the content of a table.
The content of the table will seldo
I'd write a trigger that generate a function.
This is done for performance reasons.
The function will be called several times and it is a list of delete statement
according to the content of a table.
The content of the table will seldom change and it is linked to the creation of
other tables (met
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:56:11PM +0200, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
> I will try to explain it with a sample session: this is for creating
> and writing a blob.
Oh, I was looking for lo_read/lo_write, which don't exist. It's
loread/lowrite. Inconsonistant naming is irritating.
It doesn't help the OPs
I will try to explain it with a sample session: this is for creating
and writing a blob.
From the psql prompt (> are the commands, the other are the results).
begin ;
BEGIN;
SELECT lo_creat(131072) ;
lo_creat
--
198705
(1 row)
(this is the OID number of the newly created large o
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:58:56AM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Hi,
I was tuning a join on a few tables for a SELECT COUNT(*) query, when I
realized that the content of the second table didn't actually matter to
the count. So, I figured a LEFT OUTER JOIN would be
Thanks Martijn van Oosterhout and Marco Bizzarri.But, according to syntax of client side lo_import and lo_export, we should have 2 variable PGconn (for esatablished connection) and lobjld (imported file ID in PostgreSQL).
I don't know how to do this in SQL statements.pls give me sample client side
Actually, you can use direclty the lo_create, lo_open, lo_read and
lo_write directly into your SQL code, instead of having to write a
wrapper function. It is not simple, but it can be done.
I don't have a general example: we have done this in a couple of our
projects, one being public availabe (w
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:58:56AM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was tuning a join on a few tables for a SELECT COUNT(*) query, when I
> realized that the content of the second table didn't actually matter to
> the count. So, I figured a LEFT OUTER JOIN would be faster, but...
> appa
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:27:09PM +0530, Purusothaman A wrote:
> Thanks Martijn van Oosterhout,
>
> So, I have to write my own wrapper function upon the functions below.
> 1. Oid lo_import(PGconn *conn, const char *filename);
> 2. int lo_export(PGconn *conn, Oid lobjId, const char *filename);
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Wayne Conrad wrote:
> I work with a system designed as lots of little cooperating worker
> programs, with boss programs that... well, boss the worker programs
> around.
>
> Boss and workers all use the same database.
> Today, it would once again be conven
Hi,
I was tuning a join on a few tables for a SELECT COUNT(*) query, when I
realized that the content of the second table didn't actually matter to
the count. So, I figured a LEFT OUTER JOIN would be faster, but...
apparently it's not.
Shouldn't the planner notice that the right part of SELE
Thanks Martijn van Oosterhout,So, I have to write my own wrapper function upon the functions below. 1. Oid lo_import(PGconn *conn, const char *filename); 2. int lo_export(PGconn *conn, Oid lobjId, const char *filename);
Am I right?:)Purusothaman AOn 9/11/06, Martijn van Oosterhout
Short answer, you can't. The database server can obviously only access
things on the database server. Since SQL is also executed on the
server, no SQL statements can access stuff on the client computer.
If you want to load a file on the client side to the server, you need
to open the file and copy
Hi Martijn van Oosterhout,Thanks for your valuable reply.Yes I misunderstood the documentation.Then, I searched PostgreSQL documentation for equivalent client-side functions.But I found only C programming APIs instead of SQL functions.
I want functions which is usable in SQL statements.Can you give
Le 11 sept. 06 à 05:57, Michael Fuhr a écrit :On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:39:59PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:32:26AM +0200, Jean-Gerard Pailloncy wrote: 1) Is it possible to use the SSL authentification done by apache with PostgreSQL ? I'm not aware of a way for Apache to
38 matches
Mail list logo