Hi,
I was trying to modify the physical page layout in PostgreSQL. I understand the source code for physical page organization is located at bufpage.c but I wonder what is the external interface for this physical page organization. Interface like InsertRecToPage, DeleteRecFromPage, GetAttr, GetR
A... good point.Why oh why does tyan have two boards with the same prefix ;)!!!AlexOn 4/15/06, Guy Rouillier <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Alex Turner wrote:> Raid 5 on the 9550SX is supposed to be significantly better than the
> 9500 series.>> I would be carefull of benchmarks listed out there.
I have the time to do it, but not the $$s ;)AlexOn 4/15/06, Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Alex Turner writes:> Suggests that the 9550SX is at least competitive with the others.
Thanks for the links.> I know I like the 3ware/AMCC cards because of their very good RAID 10> performance.Rai
Hi,
Myself and a friend are PhD students at the University of California,
Riverside. We would be interested in such a project if it were available.
We are both experienced developers previously interning at EA Games and
current system administrators for the CS department.
Benjamin Arai
[EMAIL PR
"Benjamin Arai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A good project for the Google summer of code would be to solve the aggregate
> problems in PostgreSQL. In addition, add some of the more complex operators
> such as rollup and etc.
That seems a tad ambitious, unless the SOCcer has already done some
no
Hi,
A good project for
the Google summer of code would be to solve the aggregate problems in
PostgreSQL. In addition, add some of the more complex operators such as
rollup and etc. These features can help close the gap between PostgreSQL
and popular commercial offerings such as Oracle an
You have made a wrong mistake in your SQL quary.
Your quary should be look like this.
SELECT id FROM table1 WHERE message like '%VAC153-683-685-131830-
/O.NEW.KLWX.SV.W.0022.060413T1742Z-060413T1830Z/
BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED
SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WARNING
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
I think it is not possible using a single SQL command. You have to
issue separate SQL command for each row.
--- Claudio Alejandro Ulloa Heinsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i want update differents rows of a table, but each row with a
> diferente
> condition, is possible make that update?
>
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:44:29PM -0400, Hrishikesh Deshmukh wrote:
> I have a question about selecting rows, my table has 20,000 rows, i want to
> look at rows 5000 to 10,000.
See OFFSET and LIMIT in the SELECT documentation. Be sure to read
the advice about using ORDER BY.
http://www.postgres
"Hrishikesh Deshmukh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a question about selecting rows, my table has 20,000 rows, i want to
> look at rows 5000 to 10,000.
There is no defined row ordering in SQL unless you use ORDER BY, so
you need to specify how you want to sort it first.
> How
Hi All,I have a question about selecting rows, my table has 20,000 rows, i want to look at rows 5000 to 10,000.How does one use the select statement in this case since i don't have a specific case to use where?!
Thanks in advance.Hrishi
Alex Turner writes:
Suggests that the 9550SX is at least competitive with the others.
Thanks for the links.
I know I like the 3ware/AMCC cards because of their very good RAID 10
performance.
Raid 10 is what I used on my last server and likely what I will use on the
next.
I wish we coul
"Andrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> select 1!=-1
> ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer
> Isn't this a bit stange ?
No. We couldn't really parse this any other way without disallowing -
(and +) altogether in multi-character operator names. There's a special
hack for SQL-spec
select 1!=-1
causes
ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer
HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You may need
to add explicit type casts.
Isn't this a bit stange ?
If I add space before -1 error does not appear.
---(end of broa
Alex Turner wrote:
> Raid 5 on the 9550SX is supposed to be significantly better than the
> 9500 series.
>
> I would be carefull of benchmarks listed out there. For instance,
> whilst looking for supporting material, I came cross this gem:
>
http://www.gamepc.com/labs/print_content.asp?id=9550s
Raid 5 on the 9550SX is supposed to be significantly better than the 9500 series.I would be carefull of benchmarks listed out there. For instance, whilst looking for supporting material, I came cross this gem:
http://www.gamepc.com/labs/print_content.asp?id=9550sx4lp&cookie%5Ftest=1
They claim th
i want update differents rows of a table, but each row with a diferente
condition, is possible make that update?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have made some minor changes and speeded things up to around 15-20
lookups/sec, good enough, but not exciting :-)
hmm let me understand this.
You went from 1 query 3 to 4 seconds to 45 to 60 queries in the same amount
of time... 45 to 60 times faster.. and that is
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> If you just want to store numbers, use numeric. Why do you want to
> combine numeric and a sequence?
He could use a numeric column and write the default as
nextval('seq')::numeric
Of course, he'll be paying through the nose performance-wise for
his insist
Merlin Moncure writes:
there are reasons to go with raid 5 or other raids. where I work we
often do 14 drive raid 6 plus 1 hot swap on a 15 drive tray.
Raid 5 is different from raid 6 To say that there are times it's ok to
use RAID 5 and then say you use raid 6... well... doesn't really s
Merlin Moncure writes:
escalade is a fairly full featured raid controller for the price.
consider it the ford taurus of raid controllers, it's functional and
practical but not sexy. Their S line is not native sata but operates
over a pata->sata bridge. Stay away from raid 5.
Do you know if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Usage is to match data from the key and val tables to fetch the data
value from the sid table.
What is the relation between key and val tables?
Will key.id and val.id be equal?
I have never quite/fully understand the outputs of analyze, but I wonder why
you have:
On 13 Apr 2006 12:20:08 -0700, Nik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to compare a large string (that has new line characters in
> it) to the contents of the text field (which also has new line
> characters in it) and it is not behaving as expected.
>
> For example I have the following record
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:13:26AM +0530, Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are getting very strange problem ..
>
>
> We Have one data field in some table..type of this field
> Is *TEXT*.
> We are storing around 1,000 (
Hello All,
We are getting very strange problem ..
Scenario..
We Have one data field in some table..type of this field
Is *TEXT*.
We are storing around 1,000 (One Thousand) lines of text
In that field.
If it's run though separate thread,
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Shoaib Mir wrote:
Actually that is the application requirment to use 21 bit numbers as porting
it from Oracle where it used to work.
21 bits are no problem as bigints have 64 bits. If you mean decimal
digits please explicitly say so. A bit is a binary digit.
Yeah
I am trying to compare a large string (that has new line characters in
it) to the contents of the text field (which also has new line
characters in it) and it is not behaving as expected.
For example I have the following record in the database:
id=83
message=VAC153-683-685-131830-
/O.NEW.KLWX.SV.W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Can I create a trigger that runs when a new object is created and see
> if its name is in an expected format and if not reject it?
Sounds like you need a database-wide trigger on DDL. PostgreSQL has nothing
like that at the moment. Your best bet
Hi,
is it possible to enforce naming convention in pg?
Can I create a trigger that runs when a new object is created and see
if its name is in an expected format and if not reject it?
I had to create a new schema 'zref' storing some of our tables to
conceptually separate them but I want to make s
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:59:10PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > omega kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=lo SRC=x.x.x.x
> > DST=x.x.x.x LEN=1016 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00
> > TTL=64 ID=21629 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=32769 DPT=32769 LEN=996
>
> The PostgreSQL stats collector uses UDP over a random loo
Actually that is the application requirment to use 21 bit numbers as porting it from Oracle where it used to work. Yeah now i have decided to use a numeric data type in a table and use that to write my own nextval and currval functions for that purpose.
Thanks for the help./ShoaibOn 4/15/06, Martij
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:52:49PM +0500, Shoaib Mir wrote:
> Actually what i want to do is store 10010 as the maximum
> value in sequence. Is there a way for it ?
Is that number in binary or decimal? In binary it's easy because it's
only 1048608 decimal. In decimal it would requir
Actually what i want to do is store 10010 as the maximum value in sequence. Is there a way for it ?Thanks,ShoaibOn 4/15/06, Martijn van Oosterhout
wrote:On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:24:59AM +0500, Shoaib Mir wrote:
> Right now Sequence by default uses bigint which
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:24:59AM +0500, Shoaib Mir wrote:
> Right now Sequence by default uses bigint which supports upto 19bit numbers
> but I want to use a 21bit that can be supported by NUMERIC datatype. Is
> there any way I can sepcify while creating a sequence what datatype to use
> or if I
34 matches
Mail list logo