Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

2005-10-12 Thread Chris Travers
Alex Turner wrote: Support for windows 98 was infact extended to June 2006: http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifean1 Right And it was extended again last year as it was supposed to extend this last June, and Last June, etc. We will see if it is not extended again But if you are run

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

2005-10-12 Thread Chris Travers
Scott Marlowe wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 20:37, CSN wrote: Just so I know (and am armed ;) ), are there any new comparable features in MySQL 5.0 that aren't in PostgreSQL up to the forthcoming 8.1? AFAIK, PG just lacks updatable views (which are on the TODO). Instance Manager: Uni

Re: [GENERAL] PG 8.0.4, Centos and 64 bit

2005-10-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tony Caduto wrote: On Wednesday 12 October 2005 17:06 pm, Brian Mathis wrote: Hello, I am getting ready to install a new server for a new postgres install, and I'm looking for a little advice. The server is a dual opteron system, and I plan on using CentOS 4.1 x86_64 for the OS. I'm going t

Re: [GENERAL] Limitations of PostgreSQL

2005-10-12 Thread Chris Travers
Scott Marlowe wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:16, Chris Travers wrote: Denis G Dudhia wrote: Hello There... I am new to PostgreSQL. I usually check out negative sides of any software or system, before implementing it or using it. Compared to MySQL, I can't think of any dow

Re: [GENERAL] PG 8.0.4, Centos and 64 bit

2005-10-12 Thread Tony Caduto
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 17:06 pm, Brian Mathis wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting ready to install a new server for a new postgres install, and > I'm looking for a little advice. The server is a dual opteron system, and I > plan on using CentOS 4.1 x86_64 for the OS. I'm going to do my best to m

[GENERAL] 8.1 Beta 3: The Final Beta?

2005-10-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Like all of our beta periods, this one has been going smoothly ... but, unlike other ones, we're seeing most bugs found very early in the cycle, so right now its looking like a total of 3 Betas might be all that it takes to get us to the Release. With that in mind, we have just released our

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Mike Nolan
> Stupid question here ... if Oracle came at us with "the Software Patent > crap", is there any "reasonable time" provided to remove it? We've > already shown in the past that that isn't a big hurdle, with the ARC > stuff, so am just curiuos as to how big a thing the Patent stuff is, or > does

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote: PostgreSQL doesn't suffer from that. Our only real, substantiated concern that I can see is the potential for the Software Patent crap. Stupid question here ... if Oracle came at us with "the Software Patent crap", is ther

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote: PostgreSQL doesn't suffer from that. Our only real, substantiated concern that I can see is the potential for the Software Patent crap. Stupid question here ... if Oracle came at us with "the Software Patent crap", is there any "reasonable time" pro

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Right. Though there are attacks, there are no fatal attacks. MySQL has to make money, so they can have fatal attacks. --- Tom Lane wrote: > Matthew Terenzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > As much as I respect Marc and Pos

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Tom Lane
Matthew Terenzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As much as I respect Marc and Postgresql.org, I can't see Oracle hiring > him away as a "killer" threat to the community. People would set up > camp somewhere else, like Command Prompt. It would hurt things for a > while but the software is too impo

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Bruce Momjian wrote: Matthew Terenzio wrote: As much as I respect Marc and Postgresql.org, I can't see Oracle hiring him away as a "killer" threat to the community. People would set up camp somewhere else, like Command Prompt. It would hurt things for a while but the software is too import

Re: [GENERAL] db size reporting

2005-10-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
jeff sacksteder wrote: I'm going to be working with some rather large datasets and I want to evaluate the effects of normalization/denormalization on disk space. Is there a simple way to find the size on disk of a specific database? To do so with the operating system is rather crude, since it

Re: [GENERAL] db size reporting

2005-10-12 Thread Tom Lane
jeff sacksteder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm going to be working with some rather large datasets and I want to > evaluate the effects of normalization/denormalization on disk space. Is > there a simple way to find the size on disk of a specific database? Look into the functions offered by con

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Matthew Terenzio wrote: > As much as I respect Marc and Postgresql.org, I can't see Oracle hiring > him away as a "killer" threat to the community. People would set up > camp somewhere else, like Command Prompt. It would hurt things for a > while but the software is too important to too many to

[GENERAL] db size reporting

2005-10-12 Thread jeff sacksteder
I'm going to be working with some rather large datasets and I want to evaluate the effects of normalization/denormalization on disk space. Is there a simple way to find the size on disk of a specific database? To do so with the operating system is rather crude, since it know nothing about what prop

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Matthew Terenzio
As much as I respect Marc and Postgresql.org, I can't see Oracle hiring him away as a "killer" threat to the community. People would set up camp somewhere else, like Command Prompt. It would hurt things for a while but the software is too important to too many to be killed by a domain name or p

Re: [GENERAL] Limitations of PostgreSQL

2005-10-12 Thread Terry Fielder
Wow, I must be missing something, because I cannot even dream up a case where I think I might find a use for the mysql INTERVAL() function, far less actually NEED it :) Terry Michael Fuhr wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:49:59PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:16, Chr

Re: [GENERAL] Limitations of PostgreSQL

2005-10-12 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:49:59PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:16, Chris Travers wrote: > > Compared to MySQL, I can't think of any downsides. All relevant > > usability issues have been solved, though there are some functions like > > INTERVAL that are not supported (

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jan Wieck wrote: On 10/12/2005 6:18 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jussi Mikkola wrote: Hi, Well, if the PostgreSQL developers would be hired away from the project with big money, would that not mean, that the project would be a good path to earn a l

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jan Wieck wrote: Oracle could even develop an exceptional interest in keeping PostgreSQL alive as it's "future DB engineer forge". Jan, Or, to demonstrate that it's not a monopoly. There will be two choices: Oracle and postgres. Rich -- Dr. Richard B. Shepard, Preside

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Jan Wieck
On 10/12/2005 6:18 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jussi Mikkola wrote: Hi, Well, if the PostgreSQL developers would be hired away from the project with big money, would that not mean, that the project would be a good path to earn a lot of money. So, new talented developers

Re: [GENERAL] count( only if true)

2005-10-12 Thread Jim Buttafuoco
try something like: select x,sum(case when id<5 then 1 else 0 end),sum(case when id>10 then 1 else 0 end from test2 group by x; -- Original Message --- From: peter pilsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Martín Marqués , PostgreSQL List Sent: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:24:48 +0200 Subject: Re

[GENERAL] PG 8.0.4, Centos and 64 bit

2005-10-12 Thread Brian Mathis
Hello, I am getting ready to install a new server for a new postgres install, and I'm looking for a little advice.  The server is a dual opteron system, and I plan on using CentOS 4.1 x86_64 for the OS.  I'm going to do my best to make it s pure 64 bit system. Does anyone have any experience runn

Re: [GENERAL] Unique index with Null value in one field

2005-10-12 Thread Jaime Casanova
On 11 Oct 2005 17:36:59 -0500, Hrishi Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to define a Unique index on 3 non-PK fields (composite key) on my > table in PostgreSQL 8.0.3. > > The problem is, if any of those 3 fields is Null, PostgreSQL allows > duplicate rows to be inserted. While searc

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jussi Mikkola wrote: Hi, Well, if the PostgreSQL developers would be hired away from the project with big money, would that not mean, that the project would be a good path to earn a lot of money. So, new talented developers could join the project and see that as a path t

Re: [GENERAL] Considering an upgrade...

2005-10-12 Thread Robert Treat
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 14:59, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 10:50, Gary Horton wrote: > > I'm needing to convince my boss that we should upgrade from 7.3.4 to > > 8.x Postgresql. I've already enumerated the upsides, but now we need > > to consider the risks...I wonder if anyone c

Re: [GENERAL] Limitations of PostgreSQL

2005-10-12 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 16:16, Chris Travers wrote: > Denis G Dudhia wrote: > > > Hello There... > > > > I am new to PostgreSQL. > > > > I usually check out negative sides of any software or system, before > > implementing it or using it. > > > Compared to MySQL, I can't think of any downsides. Al

Re: [GENERAL] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/

2005-10-12 Thread Robert Treat
On Thursday 29 September 2005 01:28, pkondratev wrote: > Hi, > two questions > 1. Why on page http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/ no reference > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oversight, fixed now in CVS, will appear on next site build. As a reminder for everyone, questions about website content /

Re: [GENERAL] Limitations of PostgreSQL

2005-10-12 Thread Chris Travers
Denis G Dudhia wrote: Hello There... I am new to PostgreSQL. I usually check out negative sides of any software or system, before implementing it or using it. Compared to MySQL, I can't think of any downsides. All relevant usability issues have been solved, though there are some functions

Re: [GENERAL] count( only if true)

2005-10-12 Thread peter pilsl
Martín Marqués wrote: I'm not sure what exactly it is you want, but check this: SELECT count(*) FROM tab WHERE expresion There you get a count of tuples that satisfy the expresion. What NULL values are you talking about? Can you hand an example? thnx. # select * from test2; x | id ---

[GENERAL] Help with asynchronous queries

2005-10-12 Thread Nicolao Renè
Hi, I need to execute some queries that do not return any value for example "DELETE * FROM foo". This queries take a lot of time and I can't put them together in a single query. If I use the non-blocking function PQsendQuery() I have to wait until the execution of the first query terminates befo

Re: [GENERAL] count( only if true)

2005-10-12 Thread Martín Marqués
El Mié 12 Oct 2005 15:42, peter pilsl escribió: > the count-aggreate counts every expression that does not evaluate to null. > > I would like to have a count that counts all values that are true. > > Do I really need to make a count( case when expression then 't' else > null) to implement this? I'

Re: [GENERAL] count( only if true)

2005-10-12 Thread A. Kretschmer
am 12.10.2005, um 20:42:02 +0200 mailte peter pilsl folgendes: > > the count-aggreate counts every expression that does not evaluate to null. > > I would like to have a count that counts all values that are true. > > Do I really need to make a count( case when expression then 't' else null) >

[GENERAL] count( only if true)

2005-10-12 Thread peter pilsl
the count-aggreate counts every expression that does not evaluate to null. I would like to have a count that counts all values that are true. Do I really need to make a count( case when expression then 't' else null) to implement this? thnx, peter -- mag. peter pilsl goldfisch.at IT-manage

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Jussi Mikkola
Hi, Well, if the PostgreSQL developers would be hired away from the project with big money, would that not mean, that the project would be a good path to earn a lot of money. So, new talented developers could join the project and see that as a path to high salary jobs?? Rgs, Jussi Bruce M

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Josh Berkus
Ned, > and it looks like postgres.net got picked up by some > guy who's sitting on it. yeah, I'm not sure what he wants. Postgres.net currently directs people to PostgreSQL.org, and I've offered the contact of record money to buy it off him, with no response. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Dat

[GENERAL] Storing images from Delphi to postgresql

2005-10-12 Thread NSO
Hello, I am trying to store images (bin files) from delphi (ADO components) to postgresql, I found data type bytea for that, but I could not make it work. May be anyone has sample of delphi code? thx Lukas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Richard_D_Levine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/11/2005 09:59:16 PM: > Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And look at it, all Oracle would have to do is to be so open source > > friendly that they make InnoDB GPL only. Can you imagine the confusion > > in the MySQL fan club if Oracle releases the next GPL

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql Mention-- Logicworks' LogicOps Management and Monitoring Platform --Taking Linux, Apache, PostgreSQL, and PHP to their logical extreme

2005-10-12 Thread Dennis Veatch
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 12:38 pm, Reid Thompson wrote: > http://linux.sys-con.com/read/139427_2.htm > > > reid Oh that's just friggin' annoying. :) Just how many more distractions, popups can a website have... not enough for them I guess. ---(end of broadcast)---

[GENERAL] Postgresql Mention-- Logicworks' LogicOps Management and Monitoring Platform --Taking Linux, Apache, PostgreSQL, and PHP to their logical extreme

2005-10-12 Thread Reid Thompson
http://linux.sys-con.com/read/139427_2.htm reid ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [GENERAL] How to track exceptions in PL/pgSQL

2005-10-12 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:40:29PM +0200, Florian Ledoux wrote: > I would like to track (timestamp and error number) in the database or > in text files the exceptions that occur in my PL/pgSQL functions. > > 1. How can I retrieve the SQLCODE in a 8.0.3 PG server ? You can't, at least not that I'm

Re: [GENERAL] user privilages for executing pg_autovacuum?

2005-10-12 Thread codeWarrior
I run pg_autovacuum as user postgres: owner of the database processes and an unprivileged user (nologin) ""Zlatko Matiæ"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For pg_dump minimum privilages is to have select right on tables. For vacuumdb, one must be owner of tables or

Re: [GENERAL] Row level locking

2005-10-12 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:30:50PM +0800, Lincoln Yeoh wrote: > will "lock sometable nowait" help? > > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-lock.html > > If it fails, something is in progress. And if it succeeds then it might hurt the performance of concurrent transactions, dependin

Re: [GENERAL] Cannot compile on Slackware 10.2

2005-10-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
Shot in the dark: Check your clock. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O

[GENERAL] Cannot compile on Slackware 10.2

2005-10-12 Thread Dick Kniep
Hi list, I downloaded Postgresql 8.0.4, and tried to compile on Slackware 10.2. However, the configure runs fine, but when I run 'make' (or 'gmake') after that, it executes the configure again (and again, and again...), without actually making the application. Any ideas? Cheers, D.Kniep

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Ned Lilly
Bruce Momjian wrote: Marc Fournier owns the PostgreSQL trademark and domain names. Minor point here, but the following domain names: postgresql.com postgres.com postgres.org ... were contributed back to the project by the late Great Bridge LLC, and are registered to the PGDG - with Tom as

Re: [GENERAL] fine tuned database dump/reload?

2005-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
The TODO has has an open item to all multiple -t options and other complexity. --- Dan Armbrust wrote: > Dan Armbrust wrote: > > Bricklen Anderson wrote: > > > >> > >> pg_dump --help > >> ... > >> -n, --schema=SCHEMA

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

2005-10-12 Thread Ron Mayer
Michael Fuhr wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:51:48AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: I'll take one Tom Lane or Jan Wieck or (all the other postgresql hackers go here) over 1,000 MySQL hackers. ... I hope their employers appreciate what they've got. Is there a good way of telling their employe

Re: [GENERAL] problem with bit(n) type

2005-10-12 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:24:41PM +0400, Sergey Karin wrote: > But if I do something like this: > kosten=# select t::text from foo; > ERROR: cannot cast type bit to text > > I get an error. Okay the system cannot cast bit to text... > But this is the big problem for me... Is there a way to cast

Re: [GENERAL] Row level locking

2005-10-12 Thread Lincoln Yeoh
will "lock sometable nowait" help? http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-lock.html If it fails, something is in progress. I believe there are also statement timeouts. Regards, Link. At 11:56 AM 10/12/2005 +, Carlos Benkendorf wrote: We have applications that are sometimes loc

Re: [GENERAL] How to secure pgpass file from unauthorized reading of passwords ? (WIndows)

2005-10-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
> Hello. > > It seems that for all automated tasks (backup, autovacuum > etc.) passwords should be provided by pgpass file. > But, anyone can read pgpass file > > How can I make it secure that nobody can read it, except > programs for backup and autovacuum ? Set filesystem permissions on

Re: [GENERAL] problem with bit(n) type

2005-10-12 Thread TJ O'Donnell
Binary data in bit(n) has no text equivalent, and so cannot be "cast" as text. It has an "external representation", e.g. B'10010101', but this is not the same as a cast. In some cases, where there bit(n) has (n mod 8) = 0 and the bitstring happens to be valid ascii in the text range, one could sa

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL missing in SuSE 10?

2005-10-12 Thread Reinhard Max
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 at 21:57, Gregory Youngblood wrote: > SuSE 10 is the "commercial" release from Novell. It contains > additional packages not in the opensuse.org open source version. > There is an eval cd and dvd set that can be downloaded of the > "commercial" release - though I do not beli

Re: [GENERAL] How to secure pgpass file from unauthorized reading of passwords ? (WIndows)

2005-10-12 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:34:58AM +0200, Zlatko Mati? wrote: > Hello. > > It seems that for all automated tasks (backup, autovacuum etc.) passwords > should be provided by pgpass file. > But, anyone can read pgpass file > > How can I make it secure that nobody can read it, except programs f

[GENERAL] How to secure pgpass file from unauthorized reading of passwords ? (WIndows)

2005-10-12 Thread Zlatko Matić
Hello.   It seems that for all automated tasks (backup, autovacuum etc.) passwords should be provided by pgpass file. But, anyone can read pgpass file   How can I make it secure that nobody can read it, except programs for backup and autovacuum ?   Thanks,   Zlatko

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

2005-10-12 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:20:47AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: > project. I hope their employers appreciate what they've got. Well, I can tell you that Afilias does. A -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.

Re: [GENERAL] Row level locking

2005-10-12 Thread Carlos Benkendorf
We have applications that are sometimes locked by a long time application and I would like to avoid these by coding something to discover if the rows are locked before working with them.   Both applications use only inserts in a table with a primary key.   I´m sure that it is not the rigth approach

Re: [GENERAL] error in SELECT from store procedure

2005-10-12 Thread Ivan Pavlov
Thanks for the clarification. The problem turned out to be more trivial. I was not doing something like: employee.f1 := 'value of f1 column'; as you suggested, but declaring "employee" as record I did not pay attention to the fact that I use a scheme named employee in the store proc. My guess is th

[GENERAL] How to track exceptions in PL/pgSQL

2005-10-12 Thread Florian Ledoux
Hello, I would like to track (timestamp and error number) in the database or in text files the exceptions that occur in my PL/pgSQL functions. 1. How can I retrieve the SQLCODE in a 8.0.3 PG server ? 2. How can I trace the exception in a table although an implicit rollback is done when a exceptio

Re: [GENERAL] License question[VASCL:A1077160A86]

2005-10-12 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 19:26 +1000, Neil Dugan wrote: > I thought it would only be needed if you where distributing the source for > Postgresql. > > Does the copyright get distributed with the binary Debian packages? > I haven't been able to find it on my Linux box. The copyright of all Debian

Re: [GENERAL] License question[VASCL:A1077160A86]

2005-10-12 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:26:48PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote: > I thought it would only be needed if you where distributing the source for > Postgresql. > > Does the copyright get distributed with the binary Debian packages? > I haven't been able to find it on my Linux box. Yes it does, in all b

Re: [GENERAL] License question[VASCL:A1077160A86]

2005-10-12 Thread Neil Dugan
On Thursday 06 October 2005 08:34, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote: > > > If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library > > > and the rest was my own stuff w

Re: [GENERAL] user privilages for executing pg_autovacuum?

2005-10-12 Thread Zlatko Matić
OK. but, is it required that the user is a superuser, owner of tables or just needs to have select rights on tables? Thanks, Zlatko - Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zlatko Matić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Matthew T. O'Connor" ; Sent: Tuesday, October 11,

[GENERAL] problem with bit(n) type

2005-10-12 Thread Sergey Karin
Hi, List! kosten=# select version(); version --- PostgreSQL 8.0.0rc5 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 (1 row) kosten=# create table foo(t bit(4)); CREATE TABLE kosten=#

Re: [GENERAL] user privilages for executing pg_autovacuum?

2005-10-12 Thread Zlatko Matic
No, I'm on Windows... - Original Message - From: "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Zlatko Mati?" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matthew T. O'Connor" ; Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 1:14 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] user privilages for executing pg_aut

Re: [GENERAL] user privilages for executing pg_autovacuum?

2005-10-12 Thread Zlatko Matic
If I put password in pgpass file it's still a plain text. How to hide it ? - Original Message - From: "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Zlatko Mati?" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matthew T. O'Connor" ; Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 1:14 AM Subjec

Re: [GENERAL] Xampp, PostgreSQL & phpPgAdmin

2005-10-12 Thread Hannes Dorbath
First, this does not have to do anything with PostgreSQL and I guess this newsgroup is a bad place to ask PHP/xampp questions. Second, if you are to lazy to install that few applications that xampp wraps in some click-and-forget install-package, why should we be less lazy and debug your broken

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

2005-10-12 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 18:52 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Oracle certainly will not win, and I think they know that I think this too and that's why I'm here. Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list

Re: [GENERAL] Row level locking

2005-10-12 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:11:00AM +, Carlos Benkendorf wrote: > How can I know which rows are locked? There's no query that says "show me all rows that are locked"; even if there was, it would be out of date by the time you got the results. PostgreSQL 8.1 will enhance pg_locks to show tuple