"Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry for the seemingly novice posting, but I could find a solution for
> this on the web so far...
>
> I've been developing a database using postgresql (and loving it) and have
> started running into problems with attem
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
'k, I'm obviously doing something wrong, since my experiences with sites
like fts.postgresql.org indicate things should be *alot* faster then I'm
getting ...
Well the first thing I would ask is are you running 8.0? My testi
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
'k, I'm obviously doing something wrong, since my experiences with sites
like fts.postgresql.org indicate things should be *alot* faster then I'm
getting ...
Well the first thing I would ask is are you running 8.0? My testing
shows that Tsearch is pretty abysmal if y
'k, I'm obviously doing something wrong, since my experiences with sites
like fts.postgresql.org indicate things should be *alot* faster then I'm
getting ...
I have a *very* simple table:
=# \d article_tsearch
Table "public.article_tsearch"
Column | Type | Modifiers
+-
> Hi,
>
> i have a probem,.
>
> I am trying to configure postgresql in sure way, I have made the
> following thing:
>
> 1. - I have created the certificate and put this in the directory it data
> 2. - given him privileges to the user postgresql for the certificate
> 3. - in the file postgre
Google is your friend, follow this
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2004-02/msg00029.php
Poul
Zlatko Matić wrote:
Hello.
I just read all about TCP/IP,
pg_hba.conf, listen_adresses and similar topics regarding remote TCP/IP
connections,
but where can I find explan
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 12:47:19AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW: at least with our current interpretation of these datatypes, the
> only type that is sensible for a now()-like function to return is
> timestamptz. Not plain timestamp; that cannot be considered to
> represent a well-defined instant
Hello.
I just read all about TCP/IP, pg_hba.conf,
listen_adresses and similar topics regarding remote TCP/IP
connections,
but where can I find explanations about how to
remotely connect using ODBC and DSN-less connection string.
For example, how to connect to PostgreSQL server
from remote
Hi,
i have a probem,.
I am trying to configure postgresql in sure way, I have made the
following thing:
1. - I have created the certificate and put this in the directory it data
2. - given him privileges to the user postgresql for the certificate
3. - in the file postgresql.conf, modify t
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:15:50PM +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> >Yep, PostgreSQL uses a single backend for each client, so if you want
> >to use all four processors, you need to be running four queries
> >simultaneously...
> >
> >
> You mean select 1, select 2 & sleect 3 will run on the same cp
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:04:51PM +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
Hello
Im using postgres 8.0.1 on Debian Sarge with 2 XEON 2.4 HT.
doing cat /etc/cpuinfo shows that linux sees 4 cpu ( the HT effect ).
I noticed that when im runing a big query only one of th
> Im using postgres 8.0.1 on Debian Sarge with 2 XEON 2.4 HT.
>
> doing cat /etc/cpuinfo shows that linux sees 4 cpu ( the HT effect ).
>
> I noticed that when im runing a big query only one of the
> CPUs become loaded.
>
> Is it normal behavior ? am i missing something ?
Yes, that is normal.
Hello
Im using postgres 8.0.1 on Debian Sarge with 2 XEON 2.4 HT.
doing cat /etc/cpuinfo shows that linux sees 4 cpu ( the HT effect ).
I noticed that when im runing a big query only one of the CPUs become
loaded.
Is it normal behavior ? am i missing something ?
Thanks
--
---
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:04:51PM +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> Hello
>
> Im using postgres 8.0.1 on Debian Sarge with 2 XEON 2.4 HT.
>
> doing cat /etc/cpuinfo shows that linux sees 4 cpu ( the HT effect ).
>
> I noticed that when im runing a big query only one of the CPUs become
> loaded.
14 matches
Mail list logo