Fixed
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GBorg seems to be broken. I get the Apache-installed default homepage
instead. Linking directly to my project doesn't work either.
Jeroen
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to i
GBorg seems to be broken. I get the Apache-installed default homepage
instead. Linking directly to my project doesn't work either.
Jeroen
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:44:36 -
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
> - From a wikipedia list I'm on:
>
> > At the moment there's not even anyone maintaining our PostgreSQL
> > support, which as free software is more accessible to users and
> > developers. Oracle isn't eve
On Jul 10, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- From a wikipedia list I'm on:
At the moment there's not even anyone maintaining our PostgreSQL
support, which as free software is more accessible to users and
developers. Oracle isn't ev
Hi Roman. Many thanks for your reply. This is interesting and will I
give this a try and let you know how it works out. With this you are
right, application logic and transaction don't have to be separate
which would be nice for this. I was thinking the only way to solve was
a function that
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-07-09 22:55:26 -0300:
> Hi. I have a form that collects information from the user but then I
> need to update three separate tables from what the user has submitted.
> I could do this with application logic but I would feel it would be
> best handled in Postgres as a t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Andrus" wrote:
> DELETE FROM customer WHERE id=123
>
> but got an error
>
> ERROR: update or delete on "customer" violates foreign key constraint
> "invoice_customer_fkey" on "invoice"'
> How to determine the primary key of invoice table which ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- From a wikipedia list I'm on:
> At the moment there's not even anyone maintaining our PostgreSQL
> support, which as free software is more accessible to users and
> developers. Oracle isn't even on our radar, so to speak. :)
Anyone looking for a
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 05:31:58PM -0600, Roy Souther wrote:
> I have been useing an UPDATE from a SELECT on a single field and it
> works great.
> To save some time I would like it to update two fields at the same time
> but I cannot wrap my head around how that could be done. Can it not be
> d
