Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, Peter.
>
> Posting a vulnerability on a public mailing list "before" there is a known fix
> for it means that you put everyone who has that vulnerability into jeopardy.
> Vulnerabilities are a special breed of bugs and need to be exterminated a
> littl
The world rejoiced as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ignacio Colmenero") wrote:
[Large amount of HTML removed... _Please_ post in plain text...]
There is no direct analogue to Oracle's SQL*Loader product for
PostgreSQL at this time.
That being said...
1. Plenty of scripting languages are available for Un
Oops! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Venkatesh Babu) was seen spray-painting on a wall:
> There aren't any triggers but there are 75262 update
> statements. The problem is that we have a datatype
> called as "Collection" and we are fetching the data
> rows into it, modifying the data and call
> Collection.save
"Karl O. Pinc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFICT, the docs arn't clear when it comes to referencing unitialized
> array elements. I assume you get NULL values here as well even
> though other array elements may have been given non-NULL values.
There is no such thing as an uninitialized array el
On 02/05/2005 10:57:45 PM, John DeSoi wrote:
Yes, exactly. If you don't assign a value to a declared pspgsql
variable, it
is NULL.
Thanks, just what I needed.
If you are concerned
about this, then always assign a value when you declare it.
This does not really address my concern. See below.
Also
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 1/30/2005 10:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
I think it is in good taste that when you find a
bug/vulnerability/etc first you contact the author (in this case:
core), leave them some time to fix the problem and then go on
announcing it to the
world.
In thi
On 1/30/2005 10:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
I think it is in good taste that when you find a
bug/vulnerability/etc first you contact the author (in this case:
core), leave them some time to fix the problem and then go on
announcing it to the
world.
In this case, core is not
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi,
From code inside a C-function, given the AclId of a user and the Oid of
a Schema, what's the most efficient way to find out if the user has been
granted CREATE on the schema?
See src/backend/catalog
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi,
> From code inside a C-function, given the AclId of a user and the Oid of
> a Schema, what's the most efficient way to find out if the user has been
> granted CREATE on the schema?
See src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c, function p
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 11:00:28PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 09:08:00PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote:
> > I would like to be able to assert that the security of data stored
> > as a value in a PostgreSQL table can be as high as the security of
> > saving that same piece of d
Hi,
From code inside a C-function, given the AclId of a user and the Oid of
a Schema, what's the most efficient way to find out if the user has been
granted CREATE on the schema?
Thanks,
Thomas Hallgren
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner w
> Hello,
>
> Command Prompt develops a lot of web based applications.
> One of the problems with the web is you can't really
> pre determine a lot of tasks because of the statelessness.
>
> It would be nice if you could tell pgpool to perform certain
> queries on initialization of a new connectio
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 17:25:06 -0500,
"Reuben D. Budiardja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am running postgres-7.3. I have a query like this:
>
> SELECT question_id, question_text
> FROM quiz_table
> WHERE question_id IN (2,10,3,6,4,5);
>
> But I want the output to be sorted in th
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-02-06 09:34:53 -:
> Since I posted my original question, I realized that pgpool notes a
> failure of either master or slave in its log. Would we want something
> more proactive?
snmp?
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
you
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Pgpool 2.5b2 supports "master slave mode" which can cope with
master/slave replication softwares such as Slony-I. In this mode
pgpool sends non SELECT queries to master only. SELECTs are load
balanced by pgpool.
First of all, thanks so much Tatsuo for such a great project!
This
> After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Julian
Scarfe") belched out:
> > So all I'm looking for is a way for pgpool to shout if it detects a
> > failure. That could initiate the investigation of the other
> > criteria required for failover.
>
> _There_ lies the one change t
16 matches
Mail list logo
