Hi,
I am a new PostgreSQL user and am not sure if this is the correct list
for this question, please redirect me to the correct list, if needed?
I recently starting using PostgreSQL 8.0.0-beta4 (Win32) and want to
migrate some of the SQL scripts written for MySQL to PostgreSQL. I
have the follow
I'm new for PostgreSQL. How can I check that what thing I use?
>>> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 19/11/2004 10:02:44 pm >>>
"Premsun Choltanwanich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could I make lo_import and lo_export to use file on client local
> machine?
If you're using libpq, it has lo_export and
Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This appears to have all gone well execpt that one view is missing.
> I've restored that view by hand but am curious if this is a PG bug or
> failure of the nut behind the wheel.
> The view involves the union of many tables and its creation failed
>
During last night's "maintenance window" (er, unplanned loss of
connectivity due to workers diamond-core-drilling through an OC12 as
part of, I kid you not, installation of a new toilet) I upgraded from
7.4.1 to 7.4.6.
Basic method:
Build 7.4.6
Backup db: pg_dumpall > dumpfile
Install: stop 7.4
Jeremiah Jahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> will an alter table that removes an oid type also remove all of the
> associated large objects.
No, but see contrib/vacuumlo.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don'
> However the /usr/lib/php/extensions directory *has* got the pgsql.so
> library file, so can anyone suggest what might be wrong? Or
> alternatively point me to somewhere better to ask?
Try one of the php lists. But check that the extension is enabled in the
php.ini first (uncomment the extension
I share the same sequences across 3 tables and have a COPY that send
data to one of those tables. That table has a before insert trigger
function that looks for a condition and redirect records to the other
two depending on that condition result. Sharing the sequence is needed
to act as a primary k
will an alter table that removes an oid type also remove all of the
associated large objects. I've been using blobs but have converted to
byte arrays, now I need to get rid of all of the blobs. Will this be
enough? followed by a vaccum of course.
--
Jeremiah Jahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Title: Message
Some wishes
:
- The win32 install let choose an alternate disk
for the data ...
Already
supported. Just click the "Data Directory" entry in the feature tree, click
"Browse" and pick where you want the data directory.
-
The win32 install use the user variable P
I'm not sure if this is really on topic for this list but I'll start
here.
I'm trying to run phpPgAdmin, I've installed version 3.5, I have
postgresql version 7.4.3 running on slackware 9.1.
I already have phpMyAdmin running successfully.
When I try and run phpPgAdmin I get:-
"Your PHP inst
Since we can specify the order of columns in copy, how hard would it be
(he asked, naively) to specify a column name that points to /dev/null
(or the postgresql internals equivalent)? Sybase's copy utility is very
similar to our copy, and has a function that you can specify in your
column list ins
can do this fine with small files But if I get above a 1000 rows it
takes so long it time out.
PHP is slow, but not *that* slow, you have a problem somewhere !
I can upload a 10,000 row equivalent file using COPY from psql in 2
seconds,
so the time is down to the PHP processing (really a
Thanks! Worked like a charm.
Mark Taber
State of California
Department of Finance
Infrastructure & Architecture
916.323.3104 x 2945
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:42 AM
To: Taber, Mark
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
Can I get PHP to remove the first row without reading the whole file in? If
there was a way where PHP would just chop the first row off that would be
ideal...
If you are using "COPY table FROM stdin" and pg_put_line() it's not much
difficult to skip the first line ;)
Best regards
--
Matteo Be
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Secr=E9tariat?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I connect as localhost I obtain :
> "Error connecting to the server: couldnot connect to server: Connection
> refused (0x274d/10061)
> Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and accepting
> TCP/IP connections on port
pg_put_Line)
I liked Toms idea to create a temporary table, but I need to be able to get
rid of the header row then... Is there anyway of avoiding getting PHP
involved in the file processing?
You could write a server side function to do the processing. You could
even use plPHP if that is your pref
When I connect as localhost I obtain :
"Error connecting to the server: couldnot connect to server: Connection
refused (0x274d/10061)
Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432 ?"
My pg-hba.conf seems correct (transmitted).
- Original Mes
Hi Martijn,
Can I get PHP to remove the first row without reading the whole file in? If
there was a way where PHP would just chop the first row off that would be
ideal...
Thanks
adam
> Wouldn't it be easier to have PHP remove the first row?
>
> And PHP has to be there because Apache is sendin
Wouldn't it be easier to have PHP remove the first row?
And PHP has to be there because Apache is sending all the data to it.
Hope this helps,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 03:43:18PM +, Adam Witney wrote:
>
> Following on from my question yesterday... Can COPY then be made to skip a
> header lin
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Secr=E9tariat?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The file F:\PostgreSQL\8.0.0-beta4\data\pg_hba.conf contain :
> # TYPE DATABASE USER CIDR-ADDRESS METHOD
> local allallmd5
> # IPv4 local connections:
> host all all
Following on from my question yesterday... Can COPY then be made to skip a
header line (the first line of the file say)?
The problem is this... I need to allow a user to upload a data file through
a web browser (PHP driven). This is then processed and the selected file
columns mapped to fields in
Hello !
The RC2 is great but :
I use an other filesystem for the
data.
So I have C:\Program file\PostgreSQL... and I have
F:\PostgreSQL\8.0.0-beta4\data.
In the file C:\Program
Files\PostgreSQL\8.0.0-beta4\data\postgresql.conf I modify the files locations
:
data_directory =
'F:/PostgreS
"Taber, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While using pg_dump and pg_restore (or attempting to restore, more
> precisely), the process failed because of a missing user, user '128'. I
> never created such a user, and when going to Privileges, such a user does
> not exist in the list. However, whil
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Marc Boucher wrote:
> At 16:23 18/11/2004 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > The system seems to think that a scan is cheap because the table is so
> > small.
> The table currently contains just over 1 elements. So 238 rows is a
> small part of it.
>
> > Have you ev
Title: Phantom user in db--'128'
I posted this earlier, and got no responses.
While using pg_dump and pg_restore (or attempting to restore, more precisely), the process failed because of a missing user, user '128'. I never created such a user, and when going to Privileges, such a user does n
Marc Boucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Index scans aren't always faster than sequential scans.
> I know that, but I've some comparisons with other queries. And someone
> advised me to try "set enable_seqscan=off;". It takes 50-60% (after
> checking right now) less to use the index. Unfortunat
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 15:47:21 +0100,
Marc Boucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that, but I've some comparisons with other queries. And someone
> advised me to try "set enable_seqscan=off;". It takes 50-60% (after
> checking right now) less to use the index. Unfortunately I can't use thi
"Premsun Choltanwanich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could I make lo_import and lo_export to use file on client local
> machine?
If you're using libpq, it has lo_export and lo_import functions.
If you're using some other client-side code, see its documentation.
regards, t
At 08:16 19/11/2004 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> The table currently contains just over 1 elements. So 238 rows is a
>> small part of it.
> No, small is typically less than 1%. This depends on the size of the rows
> and how much better accessing disk blocks sequentially is in your
> envirom
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 14:45:04 +0100,
Marc Boucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 16:23 18/11/2004 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > The system seems to think that a scan is cheap because the table is so
> > small.
> The table currently contains just over 1 elements. So 238 rows is
At 16:23 18/11/2004 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> The system seems to think that a scan is cheap because the table is so
> small.
The table currently contains just over 1 elements. So 238 rows is a
small part of it.
> Have you ever ANALYZEd that table?
Yes. That and reindex (in case o
On Nov 19, 2004, at 7:13 AM, Jim Seymour wrote:
It does
not use Java ...
[snip]
This is supposed to be an advantage?
Absolutely. The situation on Linux and Windows may be better, but it is
immediately obvious on the Mac when a GUI app
John DeSoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The first public beta for pgEdit is now available ...
[snip]
>
> * Cross platform and easy to install
>
> pgEdit is a native application for both Macintosh and Windows.
That's what you call "cross-platform," eh?
>
Nageshwar Rao wrote:
Hi,
I have set of create table statements. I need to execute them at one go
instead of running individual statement to create a table.
Help !
Nageshwar - two tips for posting to the mailing lists
1. Don't reply to an existing message with a new question
2. Make sure the subje
I try to use lo_import and lo_export for manage large object on
PostgreSQL. I found that all files must be process on server with these
commands.
Could I make lo_import and lo_export to use file on client local
machine?
And How?
Or Is it has other ways to manage large object that process is betwe
Thanks to everybody, Matt, Timothy, Richard, Csaba, Chris and George for
your help :-)
Finally, I think the right way to go for me is to generate an html
output with postgresql-autodoc and make it accessible to every
developer.
Thanks a lot for your help !
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: 01.46.47.2
36 matches
Mail list logo