Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore peculiarities

2004-09-18 Thread Tim Penhey
Tom Lane wrote: Without taking a position on what the Windows installer ought to do ... *whenever* you are restoring a pg_dump dump, you ought to do so into an empty database cloned from template0. If the documentation doesn't say that in enough places, suggest some more. Right. If, as Tom say

Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore peculiarities

2004-09-18 Thread Tom Lane
"Michael Paesold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tim Penhey wrote: >> The only thing it asked in the installer was what languages to add to >> the template, and I chose plpgsql only. > I also thought so, but it's not the case. The installer puts all contrib > modules into template1 that are include

Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore peculiarities

2004-09-18 Thread Michael Paesold
Tim Penhey wrote: > Which does bring another question forward: > > What is all the stuff that has been added to template1 given it is a > clean install of version 8 beta 2 dev 3? > > The only thing it asked in the installer was what languages to add to > the template, and I chose plpgsql only. I

Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore peculiarities

2004-09-18 Thread Tim Penhey
Tom Lane wrote: It looks to me like you have a bunch of stuff in template1, which is being duplicated into your test_restored DB and then is interfering with the restoration of similarly-named objects. Create the empty database using template0 as template, instead, and then the restore will work.