Has anyone successfully built 7.3.4, 7.4.3, or 8.0.0beta1 on
IA64 with HP-UX 11i v2 (11.23)? I'm not having any success,
running into 'make' failures. Googling old posts suggests
this might be due to missing test-and-set code for ia64?
I saw a disputed/repudiated ViSolve patch, but nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
| Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|>I did last week an Ariadne+Postgresql valutation for the company where I work
|>and I learned that
|>with 250 MB you can open up to 80 concurrent query
|>with 500 MB you can open up to 1
Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did last week an Ariadne+Postgresql valutation for the company where I work
> and I learned that
> with 250 MB you can open up to 80 concurrent query
> with 500 MB you can open up to 120 concurrent query
> from now on for each 250MB you can have ~40
> > creating template1 database in /home//db/base/1 ... FATAL:
> > could
> > not create shared memory segment: Function not implemented
> > DETAIL: Failed system call was shmget(key=1, size=1187840, 03600).
> > child process exited with exit code 1
> > initdb: failed
>
> Have you enabled jail.
Richard Welty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>String query
> = "SELECT foo "
> + "FROM bar "
> + "WHERE baz = 'bletch';"
This particular expression is rewritten by the compiler to use
StringBuffer, so is equivalent to:
>StringBuffer query = new StringBuffer();
>
>query.a
Frank van Vugt wrote:
If during a transaction a number of deferred triggers are fired, what
will be their execution order upon the commit?
Should be alphabetical within each triggering event, IIRC.
Mmm, yes, but are all the deferred triggers on the same event 'grouped'?
What I'm thinking about is
Tom Lane wrote:
Michal Taborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Is there any practical limit on the number of parallel connections that a
PostgreSQL server can service? We're in the process of setting up a system
that will require up to 1 connections open in parallel. Th
> > If during a transaction a number of deferred triggers are fired, what
> > will be their execution order upon the commit?
> Should be alphabetical within each triggering event, IIRC.
Mmm, yes, but are all the deferred triggers on the same event 'grouped'?
What I'm thinking about is something
Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
I've looked on the PGS website but don't look well enough. (I just
thought that the mirror were only there to download the last version of
postgre).
What the hell is postgre?
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explai
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 18:31:05 +0200,
Geoffrey KRETZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, if I want to post a new message I should not use "reply" but wrtie
> an all new mail, is that right ?
Correct.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain anal
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 18:08:44 +0200,
Geoffrey KRETZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
Is it still possible to find such an old versi
P.S. The original request was posted as a reply to another thread. This
is not a nice thing to do. It messes up the archives and can hide the
fact that your request is new, causing some people who could have helped you
to ignore it.
I'm sorry for that, I don't mind to bother anyone (I've just r
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 19:05:58 +0300,
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
>
> > For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
> > unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
>
> ftp.pos
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 18:08:44 +0200,
Geoffrey KRETZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
> unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
>
> Is it still possible to find such an old version of pgs av
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
ftp.postgresql.org/postgresql/source/
Sorry for the typo. It should be:
ftp.postg
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
> > unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
>
> ftp.postgresql.org/postgresql/source/
Sorry for the typo. It should be:
ftp.postgresql.org/pub/pos
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) would
write:
> Is there any practical limit on the number of parallel connections that a
> PostgreSQL server can service? We're in the process of setting up a system
> that will require up to 1 connections open in
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:
> For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
> unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
ftp.postgresql.org/postgresql/source/
7.3.6 is the latest one on 7.3 branch.
Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Hello,
For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.
Is it still possible to find such an old version of pgs available for
download ?
Thx in advance
Geoffrey Kretz - Four J's Development Tools
-
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Richard Welty wrote:
> the authors of 98%-99% of all introductory java textbooks have
> a lot to answer for. my favorite example of the lot is that
> they all teach programmers to use String in the following manner:
>
>String query
> = "SELECT foo "
> + "FROM
Tom,
We have tested our ram, and our previous build has the exact same hardware which is
stable but this does not rule out hardware. I lean towards software to the fact that
we are only finding the instability in the indexes. The four million rows we write
per day are perfectly fine, but just
It will be fixed in beta2 and is fixed current CVS.
---
Renê Salomão wrote:
> I installed PG 8.0 Beta 1 in my machine. Everything seemed ok... The
> problem occurred when I tried to install the programs in contrib
> directo
Ulrich Wisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> backend> REINDEX DATABASE "CLIX1"
> NOTICE: relation 16416 was reindexed
> NOTICE: relation 1255 was reindexed
> ...
> NOTICE: relation 16384 was reindexed
> NOTICE: relation 16386 was reindexed
> ERROR: Cannot create unique index. Table contains non
I installed PG 8.0 Beta 1 in my machine. Everything seemed ok... The
problem occurred when I tried to install the programs in contrib
directory...
I commented out dbsize from the Makefile... And everything installed
successfully... Following is compiling output of dbsize... Am I doing
anything wr
[snip]
> requests, it only saves connection start effort. (You could make the
> connection pool server queue the requests, but that is not the point of this
> exercise.) I didn't quite consider the RAM question, but the machine is
[snip]
Well, I would disagree here. If the connections are not
Really, this seems like it would be a pretty strong case for a
replicated database. assuming not all 1 clients will need to be
doing modifications. Or if they do, that they could open up a seperate,
temporary connection with the master db.
On Aug 16, 2004, at 7:37 AM, Peter Eisentraut w
Michal Taborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Is there any practical limit on the number of parallel connections that a
>> PostgreSQL server can service? We're in the process of setting up a system
>> that will require up to 1 connections open in parallel. The que
Vinay Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> select *, lower(name) from student;
> gives error: could not find block containing chunk 0x8483530
That's some sort of memory manipulation bug --- pfree'ing a wrong
pointer, likely.
> template1=# \d student
> Table "public.student"
> Column | Type
Am Montag, 16. August 2004 16:20 schrieb Csaba Nagy:
> Peter is definitely not a newby on this list, so i'm sure he already
> thought about some kind of pooling if applicable... but then I'm
> dead-curious what kind of application could possibly rule out connection
> pooling even if it means so man
Frank van Vugt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If during a transaction a number of deferred triggers are fired, what will be
> their execution order upon the commit?
Should be alphabetical within each triggering event, IIRC.
> Also, are the fire-events of deferred triggers kept in a system catalogu
Hi guys,
Peter is definitely not a newby on this list, so i'm sure he already
thought about some kind of pooling if applicable... but then I'm
dead-curious what kind of application could possibly rule out connection
pooling even if it means so many open connections ? Please give us some
light Pete
31 matches
Mail list logo
