Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

2003-10-21 Thread James Moe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:56:52 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >Note that even including the card, this is a very cheap setup. > Yes, this is the single advantage of IDE vs SCSI. If the price of the storage system is the *only* consideration, IDE is the

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql 7.3.3 on redhat 7.2

2003-10-21 Thread Martin Marques
El Lun 20 Oct 2003 14:03, Daniel E. Fisher escribió: > I have in the /var/lib/ > libpq.so.2 > libpq.so.2.0 > libpq.so.2.1 > libpq.so These look like the ones that came with the postgresql-libs rpm from RH. > also found > /usr/local/pgsql/lib/libpq.so.3 > /usr/local/pgsql/lib/libpq.so.3.0 > /usr/l

Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

2003-10-21 Thread Peter Childs
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Ben-Nes Michael wrote: > what about mirroring only ? raid 1 ? > > I always thought that raid 1 is the fastest, am I true ? > > I don't really need more then 3GB data and I have two 36GB HD. so I don't > need lvl 0 nor lvl 5 unless raid 1 is slower. Raid 1 should not

Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

2003-10-21 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 11:26, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > (I have not gotten around to testing random read and writes, but if > anybody is interested I can test this and supply figures) Can you compare ogbench results for the RAID and single IDE disks? It would be great if you could turn off write

Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

2003-10-21 Thread Ben-Nes Michael
what about mirroring only ? raid 1 ? I always thought that raid 1 is the fastest, am I true ? I don't really need more then 3GB data and I have two 36GB HD. so I don't need lvl 0 nor lvl 5 unless raid 1 is slower. -- Canaan Surfing Ltd. Internet Service Providers Ben-Nes

Re: [GENERAL] how to use pg_resetxlog

2003-10-21 Thread Johnson, Shaunn
Title: RE: [GENERAL] how to use pg_resetxlog --silly question: --is it possible to build a new DB and point it to --the existing location  / files of the old DB --and mount data that way? --i know ...  i'm grasping for straws ... this is --just about a retarded / rhetorical question ...

Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

2003-10-21 Thread Markus Wollny
> Theory vs. real life. In Theory, RAID5 is faster because less > data have > to be written to disk. But it's true, many RAID5 controllers > don't have > enough CPU power. I think it might not be just CPU-power of the controller. For RAID0+1 you just have two disc-I/O per write-access: writing t

Re: [GENERAL] tsearch2 and aspell

2003-10-21 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > Can I use tsearch2 with aspell? I didn't find any info about it, and I > don't know anything about difference between ispell and aspell. there is one difference between ispell and aspell dictionaries - ispell has affix file which contains rule

Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

2003-10-21 Thread Holger Marzen
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Markus Wollny wrote: > Hi! > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Shridhar Daithankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 08:08 > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS > > > Can you compare ogbench results for

Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

2003-10-21 Thread Markus Wollny
Hi! > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Shridhar Daithankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 08:08 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS > Can you compare ogbench results for the RAID and single IDE > disks? It would be > great if