Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But I still wonder whether we shouldn't suppress the message entirely,
>> at least for EAFNOSUPPORT errors.
> If we suppress it entirely, there is no user-visible report that IPv6
> isn't enabled on this computer, though if your kernel
Roberto M. wrote:
If I was to write a c program and wished to set and access an
internal variable as a flag for my program so that I can read it
in or set it? I have been researching for days now and I have
come across nothing that helps only knowledge that it is
possible.
It isn't clear to me ex
Thanks..
Travis
-Original Message-
From: scott.marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Williams, Travis L
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] multiple insert into's (may be NEWBIE question)
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Williams, Travis L, NPONS wrote
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:48:21PM +0200, ruben wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I must have missed something, but how is it possible that a join on
> tables A and B is faster (a lot faster) than a query to one of the
> tables with the same conditions?
>
> The problem seems to be with the query plan, in the ca
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 18:40, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > Maybe this will do it:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/sql-set-constraints.html
>
> Saw this but my take was it required the original constraint to be created
> with the deferred(able
Well, I have no mention of this problem in the TODO list, so I would
like to get a good description of why it isn't working.
Looking at the code, I see upper() is defined in oracle_compat.c (you
would think it would be more standard), and it calls toupper(), so it
probably works on single-bytes e
