Re: [GENERAL] multibyte tables

2001-06-29 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> reading throught the release docs, I see that you can set the enconding at the >database level, > and am wondering if it is at all possiable to set the encoding at the table level >instead? No. -- Tatsuo Ishii ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: y

Re: [GENERAL] no comment

2001-06-29 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
Read the O'Reilly article and see what you think http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/dotnet/2001/06/27/dotnet.html Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: Re: [G

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Oliver Elphick writes: >> It was, a couple of months back. Peter made some criticism of its use of >> autoconf, which I have changed. I have not resubmitted the patch because >> the core team seemed to think it was not sufficiently portable. I think there was some questioning of whether the cod

Re: [GENERAL] Linux

2001-06-29 Thread will trillich
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:56:56PM +0530, Kapil Tilwani wrote: > Though I found extensive documentation on the Postgres > web-site for Postgres, where can I get a similarly extensive > docket for Linux... please... including how to make linux > behave as a server for Windows clients... remember, t

Re: [GENERAL] Complicated query... is there a simpler way?

2001-06-29 Thread will trillich
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 02:24:24AM +0100, Ryan Mahoney wrote: > *Disclaimer* - me sleepy, no guarantee of intelligebility or relevence ;) > > First thing that strikes me is that you should use varchar datatype for > almost all of your fields with the exception of the body within posts. > > If I