On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Adam Lang wrote:
> Ah but remember... what is a "better RDBMS" to a company may be
> different than one for the open source community.
I'm not sure I see that...
The one place where GB can get burned is if they spend lots of time/money
implementing a feature and then attempt
"Mitch Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hhs=# SELECT age('Sun Dec 03 08:00:00 2000 EST','Tue Oct 10 08:00:00 2000
> EDT') as esec;
> esec
>
> @ 1 mon 24 days 1 hour
> (1 row)
> Ok, but if I turn right around and add that value back , I get :
> hhs=# SELE
Jeff Eckermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> extracts=# create index c_namesum_i on customers (substr(bill_company,1,5));
> ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "1"
The functional-index syntax only allows a function name applied to
simple column names.
You can work around this by defining a fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> make use of a Sybase global variable called @@rowcount. @@rowcount
> represents the number of rows affected by the most recent data modification
> operation (inserts, deletes and/or updates).
> Is there an equivalent in Postgres? Thanks much for the help.
I think th
Tim Uckun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened to outer joins? Don't you need outer joins to compete with
> the big boys?
They're done too ;-)
regards, tom lane
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Tim Uckun wrote:
> At 11:04 PM 10/11/2000 -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> >On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Asidha Luhwidyanto wrote:
> > > What;s the new in Postgresql 7.1 ?
> >
> >TOAST and WAL
> >
> >I think these are big changes that will make me think about postgresql as a
> >
At 11:04 PM 10/11/2000 -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Asidha Luhwidyanto wrote:
> > What;s the new in Postgresql 7.1 ?
>
>TOAST and WAL
>
>I think these are big changes that will make me think about postgresql as a
>big time competitor against the big commercial database
* Martin A. Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001011 19:10] wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Asidha Luhwidyanto wrote:
> > What;s the new in Postgresql 7.1 ?
>
> TOAST and WAL
>
> I think these are big changes that will make me think about postgresql as a
> big time competitor against the big comme
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Asidha Luhwidyanto wrote:
> What;s the new in Postgresql 7.1 ?
TOAST and WAL
I think these are big changes that will make me think about postgresql as a
big time competitor against the big commercial database engines.
WAL is a backup system.
TOAST is a system for worki
What;s the new in Postgresql 7.1 ?
Asidha Luhwidyanto
"Martin A. Marques" wrote:
> How far are we from seeing the version 7.1 out?
>
> --
> "And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
> -
> Martín Marq
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> How far are we from seeing the version 7.1 out?
beta starts ~Nov 1st, release in January ...
How far are we from seeing the version 7.1 out?
--
"And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
-
Martín Marqués email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Santa Fe - Argentinahttp://math.unl.
I stopped buying from and supporting Amazon.com over both their one-click
patent (enforced against Barnes & Noble and now recently, very publicly,
licensed to apple.com even though Bezos stated to Tim O'Reilly in a public
discussion on business patents that it would be used for _defensive_
purpos
Yes, that is why only superusers have access to 'create function
language c'
-alex
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CREATE FUNCTION LANGUAGE C (and maybe others) allow to load shared
> libraries. However the path can be specified arbitrarily by the user. Is
> that a way for
No matter where you choose to buy it, do buy it and support Bruce,
PostgreSQL and the publisher for allowing it to be electronically
published!!
-Mitch
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11
Hi,
CREATE FUNCTION LANGUAGE C (and maybe others) allow to load shared
libraries. However the path can be specified arbitrarily by the user. Is
that a way for a user X to gain the UID rights of the user running the
postmaster ?
..not to mention that it is now Amazon's official policy
to use/share personal information they now/will have on
you, arguably, any way they wish:
http://www.amazon.com/privacy-notice
Morey Parang
Oak Ridge National Lab
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 12:42:17PM -0600, Steve Wolfe wrote:
> >
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Wow, that is terrible. That and their "one-click" licensing patent have
> made me use Barnes and Noble almost exclusively (bn.com). Actually, BN
> has a much larger catalog of out-of-print books.
And they are accepting pre-orders. I did mine about t
I thought this was possible, but searching the archives & docs I can't find
any reference to it...
Am I doing something wrong?
jeffe@kiyoko=> psql -V
psql (PostgreSQL) 7.0.0
jeffe@kiyoko=> uname -a
FreeBSD kiyoko.la.verio.net 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #0: Thu Apr 27
10:44:07 CDT 2000 roo
Then you probably didn't install the binary shared library (Pg.so) to the
proper directory.
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Kurt Miller wrote:
> The code in question is Pg.pm
>
> The script is failing inside Pg.pm, not in the script that uses it.
>
> I tracked the error down to the line in Pg.pm that fa
>
> Bottom line is we're not sure what to do now. Opinions from the
> floor, anyone?
>
>From the lowly end of the floor... for what I am concerned, I'm not
worried about the involvment of the core team. Instead, I'm happy
that companies like GB and Postgres Inc have been founded.
I'm not a
21 matches
Mail list logo
