[GENERAL] Search (select) options

2000-08-15 Thread Jeff Davis
I would like to be able to use searches that seem somewhat intelligent. Can you 'ORDER BY' number of matching 'OR' clauses? For example, someone searches for "x y z", so I would do "select * from mytable where col1 like '%x%' or col1 like '%y%' or col1 like '%z%';", but I want it to order by numbe

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Chris Bitmead
Ned Lilly wrote: > > Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT. The performance is so bad it must be MS-Access :-). > Chris Bitmead wrote: > > > That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry > > 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

[GENERAL] Referential integrity

2000-08-15 Thread George Robinson II
Hi again. Still new to databases, and I was wondering if I could get advice on how to set this up right. Essentially, I have a table, lets call it main, in which each row, describes another table in the database. I want to set it up so that, dropping the table will also drop the associa

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Alfred Perlstein
> Chris Bitmead wrote: > > > That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry > > 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server? * Ned Lilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000815 18:59] wrote: > Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT. It's oracle??? j/k You

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT. Chris Bitmead wrote: > That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry > 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall problems

2000-08-15 Thread g
Thanks. I figured out the CAST later but didn't know the 1.1::numeric syntax. - Water overcomes the stone; Without substance it requires no opening; This is the benefit of taking no action. Lao-Tse Brian Knox Senior Systems Engineer

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Chris Bitmead
Ned Lilly wrote: > > Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) > > But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we > tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server? > > R

[GENERAL] Problems after installing

2000-08-15 Thread J. Mauricio Cuenca H.
I've had problems after installing PostgreSQL 6.5.3 on Solaris 2.7 The sorce compiled well. but when I try to run the initdb command I get the following error: [6:34pm]-machine:/usr/local/pgsql/bin> ./initdb --pglib=/usr/local/pgsql/lib ld.so.1: pg_id: fatal: libncurses.so.4: open failed: No such

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL benchmark

2000-08-15 Thread David Lloyd-Jones
: "Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can any one comment on this: > http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=CozDUWbKbytiXnZy&FQ=Linux&Nav=na- search-&StoryTitle=Linux Why would anybody be surprised? The only possible weak point in PostgreSQL is its academic heritage

[GENERAL] Building a library for PG

2000-08-15 Thread Franck Martin
I'm trying to build a library for PG to add some new types. I have suceeded to do it with no problems, but I would like to autoconf/automake the library, so I don't have to hard code the path for resources files, installation points, etc... Can anyone provide me with a standard configuration: Con

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
"Ross J. Reedstrom" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote: > > Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) > > > > But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we > > tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. > > > > And in reply to the MySQL versio

Re: [GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread mjp
Oops! You have to write a function for it. Here is a sample quick C function: typedef struct { int len; char data[1]; } string; string *byteatostr(bytea *arg) { char buf[1024]; int ln,i; string *res; ln = VARSIZE(arg) - VARHDRSZ; memmove(buf, VARDAT

Re: [GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread mjp
Oops! You have to write a function for it. Here is a sample quick C function: typedef struct { int len; char data[1]; } string; string *byteatostr(bytea *arg) { char buf[1024]; int ln,i; string *res; ln = VARSIZE(arg) - VARHDRSZ; memmove(buf, VARDATA

[GENERAL]regression test failure on initdb

2000-08-15 Thread Darrin Ladd
Hi, I am having a little trouble with the runcheck regression testing of the compilation that I just performed. I am running on a Linux Red-Hat 6.2 OS and currently have Postgres 6.5.3 running in non-default directories and on a non-default port. I wanted to install Postgres 7.0.2 in the def

Re: [GENERAL] Error with PostgreSQL - IMP

2000-08-15 Thread Stephan Szabo
I don't have any good ideas, but is it possible that the connections aren't being properly terminated so the backend is staying open? After getting the message, try doing a ps on the database machine to see how may postgres processes are running. Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 15 Aug 2000,

Re: [GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread Stephan Szabo
Well, I don't think you're going to be able to without resorting to something other than straight sql (a c function would probably work). You can get the value of a particular byte using get_byte(bytea,int) but I can't think of a good way outside of some sort of function to turn that into a split

Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall problems

2000-08-15 Thread Stephan Szabo
I believe the standard way is CAST(1.1 as numeric) But the following should also work: 1.1::numeric Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, g wrote: > I need to know how to cast types. Here's my basic problem: > I'm trying to: > > update products set list_price = gsa_price * 1.1

[GENERAL] Error with PostgreSQL - IMP

2000-08-15 Thread RacchumĂ­
Hello. I'm using PostgreSQL 7.0.2 with webmail IMP, but have the follow error : Warning: Unable to connect to PostgresSQL server: Sorry, too many clients already in ./lib/db.pgsql on line 266 But i'm with only 01 user, the error appear when the user close session and them wish input other time

Re: [GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread mikeo
thanks anyway but that doesn't work. i should've mentioned that i'd already tried that in SQL. my apologies. tig4=# \d x Table "x" Attribute | Type | Modifier ---+---+-- tgargs| bytea | tig4=# select substr(tgargs,1,5) from x; ERROR: Function 'substr(by

[GENERAL] accessing field properties

2000-08-15 Thread Campbell, Scott
Hi, I'm wondering if it is possible to access the properties of an attribute? i.e. if a given field is a foreign key or primary key, or if it is integer or varchar, etc. Is it possible to do this? I know postgres stores all of its informations in other tables, i.e. pg_tables etc, so is this info

[GENERAL] pg_dumpall problems

2000-08-15 Thread g
I need to know how to cast types. Here's my basic problem: I'm trying to: update products set list_price = gsa_price * 1.1 where list_price = gsa_price; The error I get back is: ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '*' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' You will have to retype this query using

Re: [GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread mjp
Try substr(text,int4) or substr(text, int4, int4) For example, % select substr('hi there',4,3); substr the (1 row) Morey Parang ORNL On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:34:27PM -0400, mikeo wrote: > hi all, >in the pg_trigger table the tgargs column is defined > as type "BYTEA". i ca

[GENERAL] bytea question

2000-08-15 Thread mikeo
hi all, in the pg_trigger table the tgargs column is defined as type "BYTEA". i can split this up in perl, once retrieved, but can't figure out how to "substring" it in sql. is there an SQL way to select pieces of a column of this type? any help is appreciated, mikeo

[GENERAL] PostgreSQL benchmark

2000-08-15 Thread Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
Can any one comment on this: http://www.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=CozDUWbKbytiXnZy&FQ=Linux&Nav=na-search-&StoryTitle=Linux

Re: [GENERAL]

2000-08-15 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Lee Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > cuz i've noticed in the description things like "server"..which i'm > not on i'm end user of linux looking for good database for use in linux > to switch over from using access.. postgresql is more of a competitor to Microsoft's SQL server than

Re: [GENERAL]

2000-08-15 Thread Lamar Owen
Lee Johnson wrote: > just wondering is postgresq a program that will allow similar things as > does microsofts's access..i use access for my current database for > company.. > cuz i've noticed in the description things like "server"..which i'm > not on i'm end user of linux looking f

Re: [GENERAL]

2000-08-15 Thread Lee Johnson
just wondering is postgresq a program that will allow similar things as does microsofts's access..i use access for my current database for company.. cuz i've noticed in the description things like "server"..which i'm not on i'm end user of linux looking for good database for use in

[GENERAL] Interval examples

2000-08-15 Thread George Robinson II
Could someone please send me some examples of the interval data type? For example, what should the data look like in order to do and insert? If I have two iso time stamps, how can I insert them into the interval datatype? What are some ways to format the output of an interval type?

[GENERAL] Tuning PostgreSQL to use more RAM...

2000-08-15 Thread Steve Wolfe
> Actually, more RAM would permit you to increase both the -B parameters as > well as the -S one ... which are both noted for providing performance > increases ... -B more on repeative queries and -S on anything involving > ORDER BY or GROUP BY ... For a while now, I've been meaning to investi

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote: > Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) > > But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we > tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. > And in reply to the MySQL version comment/question, Ned said: "We only u

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Doh! Sorry, I didn't cc Richard Brosnahan after all. He's at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ned Lilly wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > i haven't played with interbase yet, but my understanding is they have > > two types of server -- the "classic" (process per connection?) and a > > "superserver" (multithreaded).

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Mark Kirkwood wrote: > In a related vein, is it possible that any relevant database parameter settings >might be > published to help folk get the best out of their Postgresql systems ? ( apologies if >they are > there and I missed them ) Hi Mark, here's some more info from the lead engineer on

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Hi Adrian, We only used the released versions of each database. We'd be happy to run the tests again when MySQL 3.23 is official, or when Interbase ships a real ODBC driver for 6.0 for that matter. Regards, Ned Adrian Phillips wrote: > It would have been more interesting if MySQL 3.23 had bee

Re: [GENERAL] Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

2000-08-15 Thread Ned Lilly
Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-) But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase. Regards, Ned Dan Browning wrote: > > Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed > > proprietary products > > you used? :-). For exam