--The
reboots are for hardware upgrades!"www.nmmm.nu"; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: Nikolay Mijaylov
To: pgsql-general
Sent: ÐÏÎÅÄÅÌÎÉË, äÅËÅÍ×ÒÉ 27, 1999 03:27
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQ
Hi,
Yes, I think reliability needs more work. I've had quite a few problems with
system indexes getting corrupted (number of tuples incorrect and some other
bizarre problems). Very hard to pin down as I haven't been able to reproduce any
of these cases. I've got the feeling that there may be
john huttley wrote:
> > I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are
> > working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins.
> > Anything else?
>
> Yes, earlier in the year I was trying to migrate from Pervasive SQL to
> posgtres and
> came to a screaming
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Howie wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as
> > > > we become more popular?
> > >
> > > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility.
> >
> > I
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > - A dump program that can dump/restore large objects.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining, and we work with PostgreSQL a lot
> > without any big problems. Just some ideas to make it easier for the
> > administrator.
>
> We are going to
Toomas Tamme wrote:
>
> hi
>
> source version postgresql-6.5.3
> gcc --version
> 2.95.2
> sparc-sun-solaris2.6
>
> gives error like this:
>
> gcc -I../../include -I../../backend-Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -DFRONTEND
> -fPIC -c pqsignal.c -o pqsignal.o
> ar crs libpq.a fe-auth.o fe-connect
hi
source version postgresql-6.5.3
gcc --version
2.95.2
sparc-sun-solaris2.6
gives error like this:
gcc -I../../include -I../../backend-Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -DFRONTEND
-fPIC -c pqsignal.c -o pqsignal.o
ar crs libpq.a fe-auth.o fe-connect.o fe-exec.o fe-misc.o fe-print.o fe-lobj.o
Howie wrote:
>
...[other stuff]...
>
> ircbot=> select now(),'now'::datetime,now()::datetime;
> now |?column?|datetime
> --++
> 1999-12-27 04:25:35-05|Mon Dec 27 04:25:35 1999 EST|Mo
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Mike Mascari wrote:
> Howie wrote:
>
> > will this function/index problem be fixed in 7.x ?
> >
> > ircbot=> explain select * from logins where dttime = NOW();
> [SNIP]
> emptoris=> explain select * from sales where saledate = 'now'::datetime;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Ind
Well,
I like to see replication, at least snapshot type, and later merge type...
Snapshot should allow load balancing while querying db, and allow distributed
web/db server. The replication should work over LAN/WAN and snailmail. The
replication shouldn't be dependent of a transport/network confi
10 matches
Mail list logo
