[GENERAL] No rule to make target 'util/SUBSYS.o'. Stop.

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Like, I think this got lost somehow, 'cuz it never showed up as far as I saw... Otherwise, sorry for the repost. Well, I decided to go ahead and install 6.4.2 after hitting a wall with 6.3.2 (6.5 wasn't out when I downloaded) and am running into a different compilation error: gmake[3]: Leaving

[GENERAL] Arrays in PostgreSQL

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hi, since I have serious problems with some of the features of the JDBC driver I am searching for a different way to store the following structure efficiently in the PostgreSQL database. How can I store an array of double numbers and retrieve it without creating a row for each entry? I read some

[GENERAL] RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC:Using Large Objects

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
The large object code has been working for some time now, however not all of the stream methods work fully. The best thing is to look at the blobtest and ImageViewer examples in the src/interfaces/jdbc/example directory, as they show what methods are currently supported. Peter -- Peter Mount E

[GENERAL] JDBC:Using Large Objects

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I am trying to store some Java objects in the PostgreSQL database system. The version of PostgreSQL is 6.4.2 running on a linux sparc machine. The JDBC driver is the one I found in the src/interfaces/jdbc directory. First of all I tried to use the example provided on page 167 of the JDCB int

[GENERAL] pg_dump: "error in finding the template1 database"

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
I recently upgraded my LinuxPPC system, and to make a long story short I had to re-compile Postgres. Unfortunately I could did not dump my databases out (via pg_dump) to files before I had to recompile Postgres. After Postgres was compiled and restarted, I can access the DATA (mostly) but pg_dump

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
At 17:41 +0300 on 22/06/1999, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > When I do a large select , the results all zip past the screen > . How do I make it go page by page ? I figure this has to do > with a term setting, my default term setting is 'linux' . > I tried vt100 and vt220 . > > Perhaps this is a linux-

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
> Do a '\g | more' instead of the ';' at the end of the query. Much easier: > > select * from table \g | more > > Define PAGER, and it is automatically invoked if the data is more than the size of the screen. -- Bruce Momjian| http://www.op.net/~candle [EMAIL PR

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > When I do a large select , the results all zip past the screen > . How do I make it go page by page ? I figure this has to do > with a term setting, my default term setting is 'linux' . > I tried vt100 and vt220 . > > Perhaps this is a linux-ism ? > > Thanks >Jeff

Re: [GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Do a '\g | more' instead of the ';' at the end of the query. Much easier: select * from table \g | more -- Aaron Holtz ComNet Inc. UNIX Systems Specialist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not broken, it just lacks duct ta

[GENERAL] ?more?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
When I do a large select , the results all zip past the screen . How do I make it go page by page ? I figure this has to do with a term setting, my default term setting is 'linux' . I tried vt100 and vt220 . Perhaps this is a linux-ism ? Thanks Jeff

[GENERAL] problem with view

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hello, I have some problems with view: ERROR: RelationCatalogInformation: Relation 482442 not found thanks for your help